• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Janus激酶抑制剂治疗特应性皮炎:一项荟萃分析的汇总评价

Janus kinase inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.

作者信息

He Qingying, Xie Xin, Chen Qian, Li Wenquan, Song Zongzhou, Wang Xurui, Ma Xiao, Zeng Jinhao, Guo Jing

机构信息

Dermatological Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2024 Feb 23;15:1342810. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1342810. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1342810
PMID:38464512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10921355/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians and healthcare policymakers have been drenched with a deluge of overlapping meta-analyses (MAs), and the necessity for comprehensive and clearly defined evidence of Janus kinase inhibitors (JKIs) in atopic dermatitis (AD) is urgent.

METHODS

Six databases were searched for MAs published until October 2023. Qualitative description of MAs was mainly used, and Investigator's Global Assessment response (IGA response), the 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (the EASI75), peak pruritus Numerical rating score (PP-NRS), and adverse effects were cited to describe the efficacy and safety of JKIs. The methodological quality of the included MAs was assessed by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews II (AMSTAR II), and the quality of evidence was evaluated by the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

Sixteen MAs were pooled in this review, of which five studies appraised JKIs, five appraised systemic JKIs, five papers assessed abrocitinib only, and one assessed baricitinib. Two studies were of "high" methodological quality and 14 MAs were of "moderate" quality. Eleven MAs integrated the results of JKIs and reported that JKIs provide faster onset of IGA response (RR=2.83, 95% CI [2.25, 3.56], high-quality evidence). Similarly, 10 MAs showed that JAK inhibitors were more effective in improving the EASI75 (RR=2.84, 95% CI [2.2, 3.67], high-quality evidence). Results from 12 MAs showed JKIs were active in reducing the PP-NRS (SMD=-0.49, 95% CI [-0.67, -0.32]). All MAs affirmed JKIs added no adverse effects leading to discontinuation and serious adverse events (P<0.05). However, 200mg of abrocitinib had a higher risk of acne (RR=4.34, 95% CI [1.61, 11.71), herpes zoster (RR=1.64, 95% CI [0.42, 6.39]), headache (RR=1.76, 95% CI [1.03, 3]), and nausea (RR=7.81, 95% CI [3.84, 15.87]). Upadacitinib was known to increase acne (RR=6.23, 95% CI [4.08, 9.49]), nasopharyngitis (RR=1.36, 95% CI [1.03, 1.8]) and blood creatine phosphokinase (blood CPK) (RR=2.41, 95% CI [1.47, 3.95]). Baricitinib at 2mg was associated with increased blood CPK (RR=2.25, 95% CI [1.1, 2.97]).

CONCLUSION

Compared to placebo or dupilumab, the administration of JKIs can ameliorate IGA response more effectively, improve the EASI75, and relieve pruritus without severe adverse effect, while accompanied by more acne, nasopharyngitis, headache, and digestive disturbances. The curative effect of 200 mg of abrocitinib is significant and more caution should be given in patients with gastrointestinal dysfunction, herpes zoster, and those who are acne-prone. Baricitinib and upadacitinib should be avoided in populations at high risk for cardiovascular events.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=369369, PROSPERO (CRD42022369369).

摘要

背景

临床医生和医疗保健政策制定者被大量重叠的荟萃分析所淹没,因此迫切需要关于 Janus 激酶抑制剂(JKIs)治疗特应性皮炎(AD)的全面且明确界定的证据。

方法

检索了六个数据库,以查找截至 2023 年 10 月发表的荟萃分析。主要采用对荟萃分析的定性描述,并引用研究者整体评估反应(IGA 反应)、湿疹面积和严重程度指数改善 75%(EASI75)、瘙痒峰值数字评分(PP-NRS)以及不良反应来描述 JKIs 的疗效和安全性。通过评估系统评价的测量工具 II(AMSTAR II)评估纳入的荟萃分析的方法学质量,并通过推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)来评估证据质量。

结果

本综述汇总了 16 项荟萃分析,其中五项研究评估了 JKIs,五项评估了系统性 JKIs,五篇论文仅评估了阿布昔替尼,一篇评估了巴瑞替尼。两项研究的方法学质量为“高”,14 项荟萃分析的质量为“中等”。11 项荟萃分析整合了 JKIs 的结果并报告称,JKIs 能更快出现 IGA 反应(RR = 2.83,95%CI [2.25, 3.56],高质量证据)。同样,10 项荟萃分析表明 JAK 抑制剂在改善 EASI75 方面更有效(RR = 2.84,95%CI [2.2, 3.67],高质量证据)。12 项荟萃分析的结果显示 JKIs 在降低 PP-NRS 方面有效(SMD = -0.49,95%CI [-0.67, -0.32])。所有荟萃分析均确认 JKIs 不会增加导致停药的不良反应和严重不良事件(P < 0.05)。然而,200mg 阿布昔替尼出现痤疮(RR = 4.34,95%CI [1.61, 11.71])、带状疱疹(RR = 1.64,95%CI [0.42, 6.39])、头痛(RR = 1.76,95%CI [1.03, 3])和恶心(RR = 7.81,95%CI [3.84, 15.87])的风险更高。已知乌帕替尼会增加痤疮(RR = 6.23,95%CI [4.08, 9.49])、鼻咽炎(RR = 1.36,95%CI [1.03, 1.8])和血液肌酸磷酸激酶(血液 CPK)(RR = 2.41,95%CI [1.47, 3.95])。2mg 巴瑞替尼与血液 CPK 升高有关(RR = 2.25,95%CI [1.1, 2.97])。

结论

与安慰剂或度普利尤单抗相比,使用 JKIs 可更有效地改善 IGA 反应,提高 EASI75,并缓解瘙痒且无严重不良反应,同时伴有更多痤疮、鼻咽炎、头痛和消化系统紊乱。200mg 阿布昔替尼疗效显著,对于胃肠功能障碍、带状疱疹患者以及易患痤疮者应更加谨慎。对于心血管事件高危人群,应避免使用巴瑞替尼和乌帕替尼。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=369369,PROSPERO(CRD42022369369)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/6804a100883c/fimmu-15-1342810-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/cabc580c98b8/fimmu-15-1342810-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/335306f6cd4d/fimmu-15-1342810-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/7eae10bdb845/fimmu-15-1342810-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/e3459af13e8c/fimmu-15-1342810-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/d1a5a0e8f160/fimmu-15-1342810-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/74bb0561bfba/fimmu-15-1342810-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/4e40e952a4d7/fimmu-15-1342810-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/b23ae3709ed0/fimmu-15-1342810-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/a485cc4a9e4a/fimmu-15-1342810-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/6804a100883c/fimmu-15-1342810-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/cabc580c98b8/fimmu-15-1342810-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/335306f6cd4d/fimmu-15-1342810-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/7eae10bdb845/fimmu-15-1342810-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/e3459af13e8c/fimmu-15-1342810-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/d1a5a0e8f160/fimmu-15-1342810-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/74bb0561bfba/fimmu-15-1342810-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/4e40e952a4d7/fimmu-15-1342810-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/b23ae3709ed0/fimmu-15-1342810-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/a485cc4a9e4a/fimmu-15-1342810-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1033/10921355/6804a100883c/fimmu-15-1342810-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Janus kinase inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.Janus激酶抑制剂治疗特应性皮炎:一项荟萃分析的汇总评价
Front Immunol. 2024 Feb 23;15:1342810. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1342810. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A network meta-analysis.阿巴西普、巴瑞替尼和乌帕替尼治疗中重度特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性比较:一项网络荟萃分析。
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Sep;35(9):e15636. doi: 10.1111/dth.15636. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
3
Abrocitinib, tralokinumab and upadacitinib for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.阿布昔替尼、特利鲁单抗和乌帕替尼治疗中重度特应性皮炎。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(4):1-113. doi: 10.3310/LEXB9006.
4
Switching between JAK Inhibitors in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Unanswered Questions in Daily Clinical Practice.特应性皮炎患者中 JAK 抑制剂的转换:日常临床实践中的未解决问题。
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2023 Dec;31(3):162-164.
5
Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.阿泊替尼治疗中重度特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Jun;33(4):2335-2343. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1961997. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
6
Improvement of Pruritus and Efficacy in the Early Stage of Therapy with Upadacitinib, Abrocitinib, or Dupilumab in Chinese Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Prospective, Cohort, Observational Study.度普利尤单抗、阿布昔替尼或乌帕替尼治疗中国中重度特应性皮炎患者的早期瘙痒改善和疗效:前瞻性队列观察研究。
Dermatitis. 2024 Jan-Feb;35(1):77-83. doi: 10.1089/derm.2023.0132. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
7
Efficacy and Risk Stratification of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.Janus 激酶抑制剂治疗中重度特应性皮炎的疗效和风险分层。
Dermatitis. 2024 Jan-Feb;35(S1):S24-S38. doi: 10.1089/derm.2023.0058. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
8
Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.度普利尤单抗联合局部皮质类固醇治疗青少年和成人中重度特应性皮炎(AD Up)的安全性和有效性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验的结果。
Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2169-2181. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00589-4. Epub 2021 May 21.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Janus 激酶抑制剂治疗特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dermatology. 2022;238(4):725-735. doi: 10.1159/000518541. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
10
Extended Safety Analysis of Baricitinib 2 mg in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: An Integrated Analysis from Eight Randomized Clinical Trials.巴瑞替尼2mg用于成人特应性皮炎患者的扩展安全性分析:八项随机临床试验的综合分析
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 May;22(3):395-405. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00602-x. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative short-term efficacy of Janus kinase 1 inhibitors and anti-interleukin-13 antibodies in atopic dermatitis: a retrospective cohort analysis based on real-world data.Janus激酶1抑制剂与抗白细胞介素-13抗体治疗特应性皮炎的短期疗效比较:基于真实世界数据的回顾性队列分析
Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1639932. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1639932. eCollection 2025.
2
Atopic Dermatitis Management: from Conventional Therapies to Biomarker-Driven Treatment Approaches.特应性皮炎的管理:从传统疗法到生物标志物驱动的治疗方法。
Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2025 Sep 1;33(5):813-829. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2025.081. Epub 2025 Aug 19.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Burden of atopic dermatitis in paediatric patients: an international cross-sectional study.特应性皮炎患儿的负担:一项国际横断面研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 May 17;190(6):846-857. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad449.
2
Upadacitinib treatment in a real-world difficult-to-treat atopic dermatitis patient cohort.乌帕替尼治疗现实世界中难治性特应性皮炎患者队列。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 Feb;38(2):384-392. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19581. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
3
Comparing binary efficacy outcomes for systemic immunomodulatory treatments for atopic dermatitis in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Mechanism of PPARα agonist in alopecia areata.
PPARα激动剂在斑秃中的作用机制。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Feb 15;17(2):844-855. doi: 10.62347/JDYZ3863. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparative efficacy and safety of dupilumab versus newly approved biologics and JAKi in pediatric atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.度普利尤单抗与新批准的生物制剂和JAK抑制剂在儿童特应性皮炎中的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 24;20(2):e0319400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319400. eCollection 2025.
在一项实时系统评价和网络荟萃分析中比较特应性皮炎系统免疫调节治疗的二分类疗效结局。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jan 23;190(2):184-190. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad393.
4
Association of risk of incident acne and treatment with systemic Janus kinase inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.特应性皮炎患者发生痤疮的风险与使用系统性Janus激酶抑制剂治疗之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Inflamm Res. 2023 Sep;72(9):1861-1871. doi: 10.1007/s00011-023-01789-x. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
5
Systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.特应性皮炎(湿疹)的全身治疗:随机试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Dec;152(6):1470-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.029. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
6
The safety of systemic Janus kinase inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.系统性 Janus 激酶抑制剂在特应性皮炎中的安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 Jan;38(1):52-61. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19426. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
7
Real-world effectiveness of abrocitinib treatment in patients with difficult-to-treat atopic dermatitis.阿泊替尼治疗治疗难治性特应性皮炎患者的真实世界疗效。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Dec;37(12):2537-2542. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19378. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
8
Major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with oral Janus kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.口服 Janus 激酶抑制剂治疗特应性皮炎患者的主要不良心血管事件:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2023 Sep 15;189(4):368-380. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad229.
9
Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib and upadacitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阿布昔替尼和乌帕替尼与度普利尤单抗治疗中重度特应性皮炎成人患者的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 2;9(6):e16704. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16704. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adolescents and adults: Meta-analysis.阿布昔替尼治疗青少年和成人中重度特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性:荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 4;14:1154949. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1154949. eCollection 2023.