• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Janus激酶1抑制剂与抗白细胞介素-13抗体治疗特应性皮炎的短期疗效比较:基于真实世界数据的回顾性队列分析

Comparative short-term efficacy of Janus kinase 1 inhibitors and anti-interleukin-13 antibodies in atopic dermatitis: a retrospective cohort analysis based on real-world data.

作者信息

Sato Emi, Obonai Naoko, Iwata Mayuko, Ito Kotaro, Imafuku Shinichi

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Department of Dermatology, Ito Dermatology Clinic, Kitsuki, Oita, Japan.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1639932. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1639932. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1639932
PMID:40861471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12375639/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Molecular targeted therapies, including advanced atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment with Janus kinase 1 inhibitors (JAK1i) and anti-interleukin-13 antibodies (IL-13Ab), are emerging as effective options. However, the predictive biomarkers for treatment responses remain unclear. Therefore, this study compared the short-term efficacy of JAK1i and IL-13Ab and explored relevant biomarkers.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was conducted in 75 patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated at Fukuoka University Hospital. Relevant biomarkers, including eosinophil count and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) levels, were measured at baseline and 3 months. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) scores were also assessed.

RESULTS

Patients received JAK1i (n=37; abrocitinib, n=16; upadacitinib, n=21) or IL-13Ab (n=38; lebrikizumab, n=21; tralokinumab, n=17). At 3 months, no significant difference was observed between JAK1i and IL-13Ab in achieving EASI 75 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.83, p=0.76) or in the incidence of adverse events (OR = 1.40, p=0.55). However, JAK1i was associated with higher odds of achieving PP-NRS 4 (OR=9.36, p=0.0063) and PP-NRS 0/1 (OR=34.61, p<0.0001). In the JAK1i group, eosinophil count reduction correlated with EASI improvement (univariate: R=0.525, p=0.0009; adjusted: β = 0.567, p=0.0004). In the IL-13Ab group, TARC reduction correlated with EASI improvement (univariate: R=0.677, p<0.0001; adjusted: β = 0.661, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

JAK1i showed greater antipruritic effects than IL-13Ab at 3 months, likely due to interleukin (IL)-31 inhibition. Eosinophil count reduction was the most reflective biomarker of JAK1i efficacy, potentially due to IL-5 suppression, whereas TARC improvement was significantly associated with patients' treatment response to IL-13Ab. These findings highlight the need for further long-term studies.

摘要

引言

分子靶向疗法,包括使用 Janus 激酶 1 抑制剂(JAK1i)和抗白细胞介素-13 抗体(IL-13Ab)治疗重度特应性皮炎(AD),正逐渐成为有效的治疗选择。然而,治疗反应的预测生物标志物仍不明确。因此,本研究比较了 JAK1i 和 IL-13Ab 的短期疗效,并探索了相关生物标志物。

方法

本回顾性分析纳入了 75 例在福冈大学医院接受治疗的中重度 AD 患者。在基线和 3 个月时测量了包括嗜酸性粒细胞计数和胸腺与活化调节趋化因子(TARC)水平在内的相关生物标志物。还评估了湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)以及瘙痒峰值数字评定量表(PP-NRS)评分。

结果

患者接受 JAK1i(n = 37;阿布昔替尼,n = 16;乌帕替尼,n = 21)或 IL-13Ab(n = 38;乐必妥珠单抗,n = 21;曲罗芦单抗,n = 17)治疗。在 3 个月时,JAK1i 和 IL-13Ab 在达到 EASI 改善 75%(优势比[OR] = 0.83,p = 0.76)或不良事件发生率(OR = 1.40,p = 0.55)方面没有显著差异。然而,JAK1i 在达到 PP-NRS 为 4(OR = 9.36,p = 0.0063)和 PP-NRS 为 0/1(OR = 34.61,p < 0.0001)方面的优势更高。在 JAK1i 组中,嗜酸性粒细胞计数的降低与 EASI 的改善相关(单变量:R = 0.525,p = 0.0009;校正后:β = 0.567,p = 0.0004)。在 IL-13Ab 组中,TARC 的降低与 EASI 的改善相关(单变量:R = 0.677,p < 0.0001;校正后:β = 0.661,p < 0.0001)。

结论

JAK1i 在 3 个月时显示出比 IL-13Ab 更强的止痒作用,可能是由于对白介素(IL)-31 的抑制。嗜酸性粒细胞计数的降低是 JAK1i 疗效最具代表性的生物标志物,可能是由于对 IL-5 的抑制,而 TARC 的改善与患者对 IL-13Ab 的治疗反应显著相关。这些发现突出了进一步进行长期研究的必要性。

相似文献

1
Comparative short-term efficacy of Janus kinase 1 inhibitors and anti-interleukin-13 antibodies in atopic dermatitis: a retrospective cohort analysis based on real-world data.Janus激酶1抑制剂与抗白细胞介素-13抗体治疗特应性皮炎的短期疗效比较:基于真实世界数据的回顾性队列分析
Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1639932. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1639932. eCollection 2025.
2
Abrocitinib, tralokinumab and upadacitinib for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.阿布昔替尼、特利鲁单抗和乌帕替尼治疗中重度特应性皮炎。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(4):1-113. doi: 10.3310/LEXB9006.
3
Long-Term Disease Control and Minimal Disease Activity of Head and Neck Atopic Dermatitis in Patients Treated with Tralokinumab up to 4 Years.使用曲罗芦单抗治疗长达4年的头颈部特应性皮炎患者的长期疾病控制和最小疾病活动度
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Mar 14. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00931-1.
4
Efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in patients aged > 60 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a 52-week multicenter, real-life study-IL AD (Italian Landscape Atopic Dermatitis).JAK抑制剂在60岁以上中重度特应性皮炎患者中的疗效和安全性:一项为期52周的多中心、真实世界研究——意大利特应性皮炎研究(IL AD)
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 May 23;317(1):777. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04278-9.
5
Efficacy and safety of rilzabrutinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: 16-week results from a proof-of-concept phase II clinical trial.瑞扎布替尼治疗中重度特应性皮炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项概念验证性II期临床试验的16周结果
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Aug 18;193(3):424-433. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf156.
6
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis.湿疹的全身治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):CD013206. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013206.pub2.
7
Clinical Characteristics of Super Responders to Anti-IL-4Rα Biologic Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis.特应性皮炎中抗IL-4Rα生物疗法超级应答者的临床特征
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01514-y.
8
Efficacy and drug survival of tralokinumab in patients with severe atopic dermatitis: an 18-month multicentre study.曲罗芦单抗治疗重度特应性皮炎患者的疗效及药物留存率:一项为期18个月的多中心研究
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2025 Jun 25;50(7):1373-1384. doi: 10.1093/ced/llaf062.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib versus Dupilumab Treatment for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Four Body Regions: Analysis from the Heads Up Study.乌帕替尼与度普利尤单抗治疗四个身体部位中重度特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性:来自Heads Up研究的分析
Dermatology. 2025;241(1):10-18. doi: 10.1159/000542275. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
10
Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Update.特应性皮炎的系统免疫调节治疗:系统综述和网络荟萃分析更新。
JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Sep 1;160(9):936-944. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2192.

本文引用的文献

1
Nemolizumab Improves Pruritus in Patients With Intrinsic Atopic Dermatitis Lacking Atopic Predisposition: A Single-Centre Pilot Retrospective Cohort Study.奈莫利珠单抗改善无特应性易感性的内源性特应性皮炎患者的瘙痒:一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。
Exp Dermatol. 2025 May;34(5):e70120. doi: 10.1111/exd.70120.
2
Deciding Which Patients With Atopic Dermatitis to Prioritize for Biologics and Janus Kinase Inhibitors.决定哪些特应性皮炎患者应优先使用生物制剂和 Janus 激酶抑制剂。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 Aug;13(8):1901-1910.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.04.042. Epub 2025 May 12.
3
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib and Abrocitinib in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 52-Week Retrospective Study.
乌帕替尼和阿布昔替尼治疗中度至重度特应性皮炎的真实世界有效性和安全性:一项52周的回顾性研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 24;14(9):2953. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092953.
4
The Dual-Edged Sword: Risks and Benefits of JAK Inhibitors in Infections.双刃剑:JAK抑制剂在感染中的风险与益处
Pathogens. 2025 Mar 27;14(4):324. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14040324.
5
Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Abrocitinib and Dupilumab in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis.阿布昔替尼与度普利尤单抗治疗特应性皮炎的疗效对比分析
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2025 Apr 6;18:817-825. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S515200. eCollection 2025.
6
Executive summary: Japanese guidelines for atopic dermatitis (ADGL) 2024.执行摘要:2024年日本特应性皮炎指南(ADGL)
Allergol Int. 2025 Apr;74(2):210-221. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2025.01.003. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
7
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Lebrikizumab for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 16-Week Study in Japan.乌帕替尼治疗中度至重度特应性皮炎的真实世界有效性和安全性:在日本进行的一项16周研究。
Dermatitis. 2025 Feb 20. doi: 10.1089/derm.2025.0004.
8
A 96-week real-world outcome of upadacitinib treatment for atopic dermatitis: Systemic therapy-naive versus -experienced patients.乌帕替尼治疗特应性皮炎的96周真实世界疗效:初治与经治患者对比
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 May;92(5):1049-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.01.052. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
9
Effects of Tralokinumab on Clinical and Laboratory Indexes in Atopic Dermatitis: A 24-Week Real-World Study.曲罗芦单抗对特应性皮炎临床及实验室指标的影响:一项为期24周的真实世界研究。
Dermatitis. 2025 May-Jun;36(3):235-243. doi: 10.1089/derm.2024.0323. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
10
Ectoine Enhances Mucin Production Via Restoring IL-13/IFN-γ Balance in a Murine Dry Eye Model.四氢嘧啶通过恢复小鼠干眼模型中的 IL-13/IFN-γ 平衡来增强粘蛋白的产生。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Jun 3;65(6):39. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.6.39.