Suppr超能文献

伴有活动性出血的低级别脾损伤非手术治疗的失败率:一项东部创伤外科学会多中心研究

Failure rates of nonoperative management of low-grade splenic injuries with active extravasation: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.

作者信息

Spoor Kristen, Cull John David, Otaibi Banan W, Hazelton Joshua P, Chipko John, Reynolds Jessica, Fugate Sam, Pederson Claire, Zier Linda B, Jacobson Lewis E, Williams Jamie M, Easterday Thomas S, Byerly Saskya, Mentzer Caleb, Hawke Edward, Cullinane Daniel C, Ontengco Julianne B, Bugaev Nikolay, LeClair Madison, Udekwu Pascal, Josephs Cooper, Noorbaksh Matthew, Babowice James, Velopulos Catherine Garrison, Urban Shane, Goldenberg Anna, Ghobrial Gaby, Pickering John M, Quarfordt Steven D, Aunchman Alia F, LaRiccia Aimee K, Spalding Chance, Catalano Richard D, Basham Jordan E, Edmundson Philip M, Nahmias Jeffry, Tay Erika, Norwood Scott H, Meadows Katelyn, Wong Yee, Hardman Claire

机构信息

Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.

Surgery, Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Mar 7;9(1):e001159. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001159. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is little evidence guiding the management of grade I-II traumatic splenic injuries with contrast blush (CB). We aimed to analyze the failure rate of nonoperative management (NOM) of grade I-II splenic injuries with CB in hemodynamically stable patients.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective cohort study examining all grade I-II splenic injuries with CB was performed at 21 institutions from January 1, 2014, to October 31, 2019. Patients >18 years old with grade I or II splenic injury due to blunt trauma with CB on CT were included. The primary outcome was the failure of NOM requiring angioembolization/operation. We determined the failure rate of NOM for grade I versus grade II splenic injuries. We then performed bivariate comparisons of patients who failed NOM with those who did not.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were included. Median Injury Severity Score was 17. The combined rate of failure for grade I-II injuries was 20.0%. There was no statistical difference in failure of NOM between grade I and II injuries with CB (18.2% vs 21.1%, p>0.05). Patients who failed NOM had an increased median hospital length of stay (p=0.024) and increased need for blood transfusion (p=0.004) and massive transfusion (p=0.030). Five patients (3.4%) died and 96 (66.2%) were discharged home, with no differences between those who failed and those who did not fail NOM (both p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

NOM of grade I-II splenic injuries with CB fails in 20% of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

目的

几乎没有证据可指导伴有对比剂外渗(CB)的Ⅰ-Ⅱ级创伤性脾损伤的处理。我们旨在分析血流动力学稳定的伴有CB的Ⅰ-Ⅱ级脾损伤非手术治疗(NOM)的失败率。

方法

2014年1月1日至2019年10月31日在21家机构进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象为所有伴有CB的Ⅰ-Ⅱ级脾损伤。纳入年龄>18岁、因钝性创伤导致Ⅰ级或Ⅱ级脾损伤且CT显示有CB的患者。主要结局是NOM失败,需要进行血管栓塞/手术。我们确定了Ⅰ级与Ⅱ级脾损伤NOM的失败率。然后对NOM失败的患者与未失败的患者进行双变量比较。

结果

共纳入145例患者。损伤严重程度评分中位数为17分。Ⅰ-Ⅱ级损伤的综合失败率为20.0%。伴有CB的Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级损伤NOM失败率无统计学差异(18.2%对21.1%,p>0.05)。NOM失败的患者住院时间中位数增加(p=0.024),输血需求增加(p=0.004),大量输血需求增加(p=0.030)。5例患者(3.4%)死亡,96例患者(66.2%)出院回家,NOM失败的患者与未失败的患者之间无差异(p均>0.05)。

结论

伴有CB的Ⅰ-Ⅱ级脾损伤非手术治疗在20%的患者中失败。

证据级别

Ⅳ级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b6/10921525/f3962efdea65/tsaco-2023-001159f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验