Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL; Department of Urology, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN.
Department of Individualized Cancer Medicine, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Urology. 2024 May;187:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.033. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
To compare the cost-utility of initial management of high-grade T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HGT1 NMIBC) with intravesical BCG vs immediate radical cystectomy. High-risk NMIBC patients may climb a costly ladder of treatments, culminating in radical cystectomy for oncologic or symptomatic benefit in up to one-third. This high healthcare resource utilization presents a challenging dilemma in balancing sufficiently aggressive management with cost, toxicity, and quality-of-life.
Cost-utility of initially managing HGT1 with intravesical BCG and early radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion was compared using decision-analytic Markov models. Five-year oncologic outcomes, adverse event rates, and published utility values were extracted from literature. Costs were calculated from a US Medicare perspective in 2021 US dollars. Sensitivity analysis identified drivers of cost and break-even points for recurrence and progression.
Mean costs were $26,093 for intravesical BCG and $39,720 for immediate radical cystectomy, though cystectomy generated a gain of 2.2 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to intravesical BCG. Immediate cystectomy was a more cost-effective management strategy for HGT1 NMIBC with an incremental CE ratios (ICER) of $7120/QALY. The costs associated with cystectomy, TURBT, and BCG toxicity had the greatest impact on ICER. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that intravesical BCG became a cost-effective management strategy if the 5-year recurrence rate of HG T1 was less than 56% or the 5-year progression rate to MIBC was less than 4%.
At current prices, treatment of high-grade T1 NMIBC with early radical cystectomy is more cost-effective management strategy than initial treatment with intravesical BCG.
比较经膀胱卡介苗(BCG)初始治疗与根治性膀胱切除术治疗高级别 T1 非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(HGT1 NMIBC)的成本-效用。高危 NMIBC 患者可能会经历一系列昂贵的治疗方案,最终多达三分之一的患者会因肿瘤或症状获益而接受根治性膀胱切除术。这种高医疗资源利用率在平衡足够积极的治疗与成本、毒性和生活质量方面带来了具有挑战性的难题。
使用决策分析马尔可夫模型比较经膀胱 BCG 初始治疗 HGT1 和早期根治性膀胱切除术联合回肠导管尿流改道术的成本-效用。从文献中提取 5 年肿瘤学结果、不良事件发生率和已发表的效用值。以 2021 年的美元计算,从美国医疗保险的角度计算了成本。敏感性分析确定了复发和进展的成本驱动因素和盈亏平衡点。
BCG 组的平均费用为 26093 美元,根治性膀胱切除术组的平均费用为 39720 美元,但根治性膀胱切除术比经膀胱 BCG 组多获得 2.2 个质量调整生命年(QALY)。对于 HGT1 NMIBC,立即进行根治性膀胱切除术是一种更具成本效益的治疗策略,增量成本效果比(ICER)为 7120 美元/QALY。与膀胱切除术、TURBT 和 BCG 毒性相关的成本对 ICER 影响最大。单因素敏感性分析表明,如果 HG T1 的 5 年复发率低于 56%或向 MIBC 的 5 年进展率低于 4%,则经膀胱 BCG 治疗成为一种具有成本效益的治疗策略。
按照目前的价格,早期根治性膀胱切除术治疗高级别 T1 NMIBC 是比经膀胱 BCG 初始治疗更具成本效益的治疗策略。