• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行使医疗判断:复苏与“终末关怀决策”,安大略省医师和外科医生学院的新政策。

Exercising medical judgement: resuscitation and "Decision-Making for End-of-Life Care," a new policy from the College of Physician and Surgeons of Ontario.

机构信息

Joint Centre for Bioethics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care Medicine Residency Program, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2024 Apr;71(4):447-452. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02724-2. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1007/s12630-024-02724-2
PMID:38468076
Abstract

In March 2023, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) updated their policy entitled Decision-Making for End-of-Life Care. This policy will significantly change the landscape and clinical practice in Canada's most populous province with respect to decision-making for resuscitation. The update interrupts approximately eight years of CPSO policy that has mandated physicians to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other resuscitative measures unless they can explicitly obtain consent in the form of a do-not-resuscitate or no-CPR order. The policy is now aligned with the Wawrzyniak v. Livingstone, 2019 court decision which reaffirmed that physicians must only offer treatments that they think are within the standard of care and not offer treatments that are not likely to benefit their patient. In this commentary, we review the historical aspects of the CPSO policy from 2015 to 2023 and discuss how such a policy of a "consent to withhold" paradigm was ethically problematic and likely led to significant harm. We then review the updated CPSO policy, outline some remaining areas of uncertainty and challenges, and make recommendations for how to interpret this policy in clinical practice.

摘要

2023 年 3 月,安大略省医师和外科医生学院(CPSO)更新了其题为《生命末期护理决策》的政策。该政策将极大地改变加拿大人口最多的省份在复苏决策方面的格局和临床实践。此次更新中断了 CPSO 大约八年的政策,该政策要求医生进行心肺复苏术(CPR)和其他复苏措施,除非他们能够以不复苏或无 CPR 命令的形式明确获得同意。该政策现在与 Wawrzyniak v. Livingstone, 2019 法院判决保持一致,该判决重申医生只需提供他们认为符合护理标准的治疗,而不是提供不太可能使患者受益的治疗。在这篇评论中,我们回顾了 2015 年至 2023 年 CPSO 政策的历史方面,并讨论了这种“拒绝提供治疗的同意”范式在伦理上存在问题,可能导致严重伤害。然后,我们审查了更新后的 CPSO 政策,概述了一些仍然存在的不确定性和挑战,并就如何在临床实践中解释该政策提出了建议。

相似文献

1
Exercising medical judgement: resuscitation and "Decision-Making for End-of-Life Care," a new policy from the College of Physician and Surgeons of Ontario.行使医疗判断:复苏与“终末关怀决策”,安大略省医师和外科医生学院的新政策。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Apr;71(4):447-452. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02724-2. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
"Must do CPR??": strategies to cope with the new College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario policy on end-of-life care.“必须进行心肺复苏吗?”:应对安大略省医师和外科医生学院关于临终关怀新政策的策略
Can J Anaesth. 2016 Aug;63(8):973-80. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0665-3. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
3
Influence of institutional culture and policies on do-not-resuscitate decision making at the end of life.机构文化和政策对生命末期不复苏决策的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):812-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0295.
4
Partial do-not-resuscitate orders: A hazard to patient safety and clinical outcomes?部分不复苏医嘱:对患者安全和临床结局的危害?
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):14-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feb8f6.
5
Towards a modified cardiopulmonary resuscitation policy.迈向改良的心肺复苏政策。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 Feb;14(2):203-8.
6
Implementing a resuscitation policy for patients at the end of life in an acute hospital setting: qualitative study.在急性医院环境中为临终患者实施复苏政策:定性研究
Palliat Med. 2007 Jun;21(4):305-12. doi: 10.1177/0269216307077817.
7
Experience with a Revised Hospital Policy on Not Offering Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.一项修订后的医院不提供心肺复苏政策的经验
HEC Forum. 2022 Mar;34(1):73-88. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09429-1. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
8
To resuscitate or not: a dilemma in terminal cancer care.是否进行复苏:晚期癌症护理中的一个两难困境。
Resuscitation. 2001 Jun;49(3):289-97. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00367-1.
9
Discussing CPR near the end of life.在生命末期讨论心肺复苏术。
Nurs Times. 2015;111(4):15-7.
10
Experience with a hospital policy on not offering cardiopulmonary resuscitation when believed more harmful than beneficial.不提供心肺复苏术的医院政策经验,当认为弊大于利时。
J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of artificial intelligence in life-sustaining treatment decisions: current state and future considerations.人工智能在维持生命治疗决策中的作用:现状与未来考量。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):157-159. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07738-4. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
CEPP: Canadian Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) Protocol Project.CEPP:加拿大体外生命支持(ECLS)协议项目。
CJC Open. 2022 Feb 15;4(6):520-531. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.02.005. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Ethical Dilemmas, Moral Distress, and the Risk of Moral Injury: Experiences of Residents and Fellows During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.伦理困境、道德困境和道德伤害风险:美国 COVID-19 大流行期间住院医师和研究员的经历。
Acad Med. 2022 Mar 1;97(3S):S55-S60. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004536.
3
Clinician Ethical Perspectives on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Practice.
临床医生在实践中对体外膜肺氧合的伦理观点。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Jun;39(6):659-666. doi: 10.1177/10499091211041079. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
4
Meaningful futility: requests for resuscitation against medical recommendation.有意义的无效医疗:违背医疗建议的复苏请求。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Oct;47(10):654-656. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106232. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
5
Do physicians require consent to withhold CPR that they determine to be nonbeneficial?医生决定不进行心肺复苏(CPR)时,是否需要征得同意?
CMAJ. 2019 Nov 25;191(47):E1289-E1290. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.191196.
6
A critical review of the factors leading to cardiopulmonary resuscitation as the default position of hospitalized patients in the USA regardless of severity of illness.对导致在美国住院患者无论病情严重程度均将心肺复苏作为默认措施的因素进行的批判性综述。
Int J Emerg Med. 2019 Mar 13;12(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12245-019-0225-z.
7
In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review.院内心搏骤停:综述。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 26;321(12):1200-1210. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1696.
8
Ethical failings of CPSO policy and the health care consent act: case review.安大略省专业医师监管局政策和医疗保健同意法案的道德缺陷:案例审查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Mar 19;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0357-y.
9
"Must do CPR??": strategies to cope with the new College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario policy on end-of-life care.“必须进行心肺复苏吗?”:应对安大略省医师和外科医生学院关于临终关怀新政策的策略
Can J Anaesth. 2016 Aug;63(8):973-80. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0665-3. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
10
It isn't like this on TV: Revisiting CPR survival rates depicted on popular TV shows.电视里可不是这样:重温热门电视节目中描绘的心肺复苏存活率。
Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:148-50. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 19.