Joint Centre for Bioethics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care Medicine Residency Program, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Apr;71(4):447-452. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02724-2. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
In March 2023, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) updated their policy entitled Decision-Making for End-of-Life Care. This policy will significantly change the landscape and clinical practice in Canada's most populous province with respect to decision-making for resuscitation. The update interrupts approximately eight years of CPSO policy that has mandated physicians to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other resuscitative measures unless they can explicitly obtain consent in the form of a do-not-resuscitate or no-CPR order. The policy is now aligned with the Wawrzyniak v. Livingstone, 2019 court decision which reaffirmed that physicians must only offer treatments that they think are within the standard of care and not offer treatments that are not likely to benefit their patient. In this commentary, we review the historical aspects of the CPSO policy from 2015 to 2023 and discuss how such a policy of a "consent to withhold" paradigm was ethically problematic and likely led to significant harm. We then review the updated CPSO policy, outline some remaining areas of uncertainty and challenges, and make recommendations for how to interpret this policy in clinical practice.
2023 年 3 月,安大略省医师和外科医生学院(CPSO)更新了其题为《生命末期护理决策》的政策。该政策将极大地改变加拿大人口最多的省份在复苏决策方面的格局和临床实践。此次更新中断了 CPSO 大约八年的政策,该政策要求医生进行心肺复苏术(CPR)和其他复苏措施,除非他们能够以不复苏或无 CPR 命令的形式明确获得同意。该政策现在与 Wawrzyniak v. Livingstone, 2019 法院判决保持一致,该判决重申医生只需提供他们认为符合护理标准的治疗,而不是提供不太可能使患者受益的治疗。在这篇评论中,我们回顾了 2015 年至 2023 年 CPSO 政策的历史方面,并讨论了这种“拒绝提供治疗的同意”范式在伦理上存在问题,可能导致严重伤害。然后,我们审查了更新后的 CPSO 政策,概述了一些仍然存在的不确定性和挑战,并就如何在临床实践中解释该政策提出了建议。