Suppr超能文献

结核病治疗随机对照试验中临床终点的估计值:在一项已完成试验中的回顾性应用

Estimands for clinical endpoints in tuberculosis treatment randomized controlled trials: a retrospective application in a completed trial.

作者信息

Weir Isabelle R, Dufault Suzanne M, Phillips Patrick P J

机构信息

Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research in the Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Mar 12;25(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07999-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) rely on a composite primary outcome to capture unfavorable treatment responses. However, variability between trials in the outcome definition and estimation methods complicates across-trial comparisons and hinders the advancement of treatment guidelines. The International Council for Harmonization (ICH) provides international regulatory standards for clinical trials. The estimand framework outlined in the recent ICH E9(R1) addendum offers a timely opportunity for randomized trials of TB treatment to adopt broadly standardized outcome definitions and analytic approaches. We previously proposed and defined four estimands for use in this context. Our objective was to evaluate how the use of these estimands and choice of estimation method impacts results and interpretation of a large phase III TB trial.

METHODS

We reanalyzed participant-level data from the REMoxTB trial. We applied four estimands and various methods of estimation to assess non-inferiority of both novel 4-month treatment regimens against standard of care.

RESULTS

With each of the four estimands, we reached the same conclusion as the original trial analysis that the novel regimens were not non-inferior to standard of care. Each estimand and method of estimation gave similar estimates of the treatment effect with fluctuations in variance and differences driven by the methods applied for handling intercurrent events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our application of estimands defined by the ICH E9 (R1) addendum offers a formalized framework for addressing the primary TB treatment trial objective and can promote uniformity in future trials by limiting heterogeneity in trial outcome definitions. We demonstrated the utility of our proposal using data from the REMoxTB randomized trial. We outlined methods for estimating each estimand and found consistent conclusions across estimands. We recommend future late-phase TB treatment trials to implement some or all of our estimands to promote rigorous outcome definitions and reduce variability between trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00864383. Registered on March 2009.

摘要

背景

结核病(TB)治疗的随机试验依赖于综合主要结局来捕捉不良治疗反应。然而,各试验在结局定义和估计方法上的差异使得跨试验比较变得复杂,并阻碍了治疗指南的推进。国际协调理事会(ICH)为临床试验提供国际监管标准。最近的ICH E9(R1)增编中概述的估计量框架为结核病治疗的随机试验提供了一个及时的机会,使其能够采用广泛标准化的结局定义和分析方法。我们之前曾为此提出并定义了四个估计量。我们的目的是评估这些估计量的使用以及估计方法的选择如何影响一项大型III期结核病试验的结果和解释。

方法

我们重新分析了REMoxTB试验中参与者层面的数据。我们应用了四个估计量和各种估计方法来评估两种新型4个月治疗方案相对于标准治疗的非劣效性。

结果

使用这四个估计量中的每一个,我们都得出了与原始试验分析相同的结论,即新型方案并不优于标准治疗。每个估计量和估计方法对治疗效果的估计相似,但方差波动和差异是由处理并发事件所采用的方法驱动的。

结论

我们对ICH E9(R1)增编定义的估计量的应用为解决主要结核病治疗试验目标提供了一个形式化框架,并且可以通过限制试验结局定义的异质性来促进未来试验的一致性。我们使用REMoxTB随机试验的数据证明了我们提议的实用性。我们概述了估计每个估计量的方法,并在各估计量之间得出了一致的结论。我们建议未来的晚期结核病治疗试验实施我们的部分或全部估计量,以促进严格的结局定义并减少试验之间的差异。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00864383。于2009年3月注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc66/10929173/aa5b3f37348c/13063_2024_7999_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

3
Incorporating estimands into clinical trial statistical analysis plans.
Clin Trials. 2022 Jun;19(3):285-291. doi: 10.1177/17407745221080463. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
5
Rethinking intercurrent events in defining estimands for tuberculosis trials.
Clin Trials. 2022 Oct;19(5):522-533. doi: 10.1177/17407745221103853. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
Estimands in published protocols of randomised trials: urgent improvement needed.
Trials. 2021 Oct 9;22(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05644-4.
7
A note on the draft International Council for Harmonisation guidance on estimands and sensitivity analysis.
Clin Trials. 2019 Aug;16(4):339-344. doi: 10.1177/1740774519844259. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
9
The estimand framework and its application in substance use disorder clinical trials: a case study.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 Nov 2;47(6):658-663. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2021.1976199. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
3
Rethinking intercurrent events in defining estimands for tuberculosis trials.
Clin Trials. 2022 Oct;19(5):522-533. doi: 10.1177/17407745221103853. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Four-Month Rifapentine Regimens with or without Moxifloxacin for Tuberculosis.
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):1705-1718. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2033400.
7
Patient-perceived treatment burden of tuberculosis treatment.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0241124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241124. eCollection 2020.
8
Per-Protocol Analyses of Pragmatic Trials.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1391-1398. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsm1605385.
9
High-dose rifapentine with moxifloxacin for pulmonary tuberculosis.
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1599-608. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314210.
10
A four-month gatifloxacin-containing regimen for treating tuberculosis.
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1588-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315817.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验