Suzuki Misa, Komiya Takako, Asai Maiko, Ayabe Nanako, Hanano Mai, Kawai Yuichiro, Shimada Kazuki, Ishikawa Takashi, Matsumura Hajime
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Breast Oncology and Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Int Wound J. 2024 Mar;21(3):e14822. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14822.
Incisional scarring is a factor of cosmetic appearance evaluated after breast reconstruction, along with the shape, position, and size of the breast. This study aimed to examine the effect of the incision scar location on patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction. Using the Japanese version of the SCAR-Q, we assessed the scar appearance, symptoms and psychosocial effects. Plastic surgeons performed assessments using the Manchester Scar Scale. The patients were divided into two groups: those with scars on the margins of the breast (MB group) and those with scars in the breast area (IB group). The results revealed that patients in the MB group reported significantly higher satisfaction with the scar appearance and psychological impact than those in the IB group. However, assessments using the Manchester Scar Scale did not reveal any significant differences between the two groups. In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of patient-reported outcomes in the evaluation of scar satisfaction after breast reconstruction. Patients tend to prefer and have higher satisfaction with scars along the breast margin, which offers valuable insights into surgical decisions. Further studies with larger and more diverse sample sizes are required for validation.
切口瘢痕是乳房重建后评估美容外观的一个因素,与乳房的形状、位置和大小一起。本研究旨在探讨切口瘢痕位置对乳房重建后患者满意度的影响。我们使用SCAR-Q的日语版本评估瘢痕外观、症状和心理社会影响。整形外科医生使用曼彻斯特瘢痕量表进行评估。患者分为两组:乳房边缘有瘢痕的患者(MB组)和乳房区域有瘢痕的患者(IB组)。结果显示,MB组患者对瘢痕外观和心理影响的满意度显著高于IB组。然而,使用曼彻斯特瘢痕量表进行的评估未显示两组之间有任何显著差异。总之,本研究强调了患者报告结局在乳房重建后瘢痕满意度评估中的重要性。患者倾向于更喜欢乳房边缘的瘢痕并对其有更高的满意度,这为手术决策提供了有价值的见解。需要进一步进行更大样本量和更多样化的研究来验证。