Iwashita Masayuki, Yamadera Wataru, Hotchi Ayana, Utsumi Tomohiro, Amagai Misato, Ishii Junpei, Suzuki Takako, Itoh Hiroshi, Shigeta Masahiro
Department of Psychiatry, Jikei University School of Medicine, 19-18, 3-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461 Japan.
Department of Psychiatry, The Jikei University Hospital, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2022 Jun 7;20(4):489-497. doi: 10.1007/s41105-022-00395-4. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is effective for not only primary insomnia (PI) but also comorbid insomnia (CI; insomnia associated with psychiatric/physical diseases or other types of sleep disorders). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of CBT-I implemented in the same manner between patients with PI and CI. In total, 41 adult patients who had completed CBT-I were enrolled in this retrospective analysis and divided into a PI group and a CI group. The authors then examined and compared the significance of changes after therapy between the two groups. The magnitude of improvement on the Japanese version of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI-J) was analyzed as the primary endpoint. In the PI group ( = 24), both the ISI-J score and the dose of hypnotics decreased significantly following CBT-I. On the other hand, in the CI group ( = 17), only the dose of hypnotics decreased significantly; no statistically significant improvement was seen in the ISI-J score. Sleep onset latency and sleep quality rating in recorded sleep diaries were significantly correlated with improved ISI-J scores in the CI group only. CBT-I was shown to be effective for CI, but its efficacy for CI was inferior to that for PI in terms of impact on sleep and mental condition. These results suggest that in addition to the basic components of CBT-I, treatment for CI, especially when accompanied by severe insomnia symptoms, should include approaches targeting the comorbid disease.
失眠的认知行为疗法(CBT-I)不仅对原发性失眠(PI)有效,对共病性失眠(CI;与精神/身体疾病或其他类型睡眠障碍相关的失眠)也有效。本研究旨在比较以相同方式实施的CBT-I在PI患者和CI患者中的治疗效果。共有41名完成CBT-I的成年患者纳入了这项回顾性分析,并分为PI组和CI组。然后,作者检查并比较了两组治疗后变化的显著性。将日语版失眠严重程度指数(ISI-J)的改善程度作为主要终点进行分析。在PI组(n = 24)中,CBT-I治疗后ISI-J评分和催眠药剂量均显著降低。另一方面,在CI组(n = 17)中,只有催眠药剂量显著降低;ISI-J评分未见统计学上的显著改善。仅在CI组中,记录的睡眠日记中的入睡潜伏期和睡眠质量评分与ISI-J评分的改善显著相关。结果表明,CBT-I对CI有效,但其对CI的疗效在对睡眠和精神状态的影响方面不如对PI的疗效。这些结果表明,除了CBT-I的基本组成部分外,CI的治疗,尤其是伴有严重失眠症状时,应包括针对共病疾病的方法。