Suppr超能文献

免疫生态学研究中的现实主义:人工饲料增强了毛虫的免疫防御,但并未掩盖可塑性免疫策略的影响。

Realism in Immune Ecology Studies: Artificial Diet Enhances a Caterpillar's Immune Defense but Does Not Mask the Effects of a Plastic Immune Strategy.

作者信息

Costantin Eduardo C, Viol Daniel L, Del Puppo Nathalia P, Elliot Simon L

机构信息

Laboratory of Insect-Microbe Interactions, Department of Entomology, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Insect Sci. 2022 Jan 21;1:754571. doi: 10.3389/finsc.2021.754571. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The immune system is considered a functional trait in life-history theory and its modulation is predicted to be costly and highly dependent on the host's nutrition. Therefore, the nutritional status of an individual has a great impact on an animal's immune ecology. Herbivorous insects are commonly used as model organisms in eco-immunology studies and the use of an artificial diet is the predominant rearing procedure to test them. However, this diet differs from what herbivores experience in nature and it is unclear to what degree this distinction might impact on the relevance of these studies for the real world. Here, we compared plant-based . artificial diet in a set of three experiments to investigate the interaction of both diets with a plastic immune strategy known as Density-Dependent Prophylaxis (DDP). We used as a model organism the velvetbean caterpillar , which is known to adjust its immune defense in line with the DDP hypothesis. Our main results showed that larvae fed with artificial diet had 20.5% more hemocytes circulating in the hemolymph and died 20% more slowly when infected with an obligate (viral) pathogen. Crucially, however, we did not find any indication of fitness costs related to DDP. The use of artificial diet did not interact with that of DDP except in the case of host survival after infection, where the DDP effect was only observable in this diet. Our findings suggest the use of an artificial diet does not mask resource allocation conflicts between immune investment and fitness related traits, but to some extent it might lead to an overestimation of immune parameters and host survival time after infection. We believe that this is the first study to compare an artificial diet and a host plant covering all these aspects: immune parameters, life-history traits, and host survival after infection. Here we provide evidence that, besides the quantitative effects in immune parameters and host survival time, the use of artificial diet interacts only marginally with a density-dependent immune response. This provides support for the use of artificial diets in eco-immunology studies with insects.

摘要

在生活史理论中,免疫系统被视为一种功能性状,预计其调节成本高昂且高度依赖宿主的营养状况。因此,个体的营养状况对动物的免疫生态学有很大影响。食草昆虫通常被用作生态免疫学研究的模式生物,使用人工饲料是测试它们的主要饲养方法。然而,这种饲料与食草动物在自然环境中所摄取的不同,目前尚不清楚这种差异会在多大程度上影响这些研究与现实世界的相关性。在此,我们在一组三个实验中比较了基于植物的人工饲料,以研究这两种饲料与一种称为密度依赖性预防(DDP)的可塑性免疫策略之间的相互作用。我们将豆天蛾作为模式生物,已知它会根据DDP假说来调整其免疫防御。我们的主要结果表明,用人工饲料喂养的幼虫血淋巴中循环的血细胞多20.5%,感染专性(病毒)病原体时死亡速度慢20%。然而,至关重要的是,我们没有发现任何与DDP相关的适应性成本迹象。人工饲料的使用与DDP的使用没有相互作用,除了在感染后宿主存活的情况下,DDP效应仅在这种饲料中可观察到。我们的研究结果表明,使用人工饲料不会掩盖免疫投资与适应性相关性状之间的资源分配冲突,但在某种程度上可能会导致对免疫参数和感染后宿主存活时间的高估。我们认为,这是第一项比较人工饲料和宿主植物并涵盖所有这些方面的研究:免疫参数、生活史性状以及感染后宿主存活情况。我们在此提供证据表明,除了对免疫参数和宿主存活时间的定量影响外,人工饲料的使用仅与密度依赖性免疫反应有轻微相互作用。这为在昆虫生态免疫学研究中使用人工饲料提供了支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/686e/10926546/b6de1eb25a2c/finsc-01-754571-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验