• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维奈托克联合低甲基化药物与阿糖胞苷、阿克拉霉素和粒细胞集落刺激因子化疗作为初治急性髓系白血病的一线治疗:一项倾向评分匹配分析。

Venetoclax plus a hypomethylating agent versus cytarabine, aclarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor chemotherapy as a first-line therapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: A propensity score-matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.

出版信息

Cancer. 2024 Jul 15;130(14):2472-2481. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35278. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.35278
PMID:38470375
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both venetoclax plus a hypomethylating agent (VEN/HMA) and cytarabine, aclarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG) are low-intensity regimens for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that show good efficacy and safety. It is unknown how VEN/HMA compares with the CAG regimen for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML.

METHODS

The outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with VEN/HMA were compared with those of patients treated with a CAG-based regimen. Propensity score matching between these two cohorts at a 1:1 ratio was performed according to age at diagnosis, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, state of fitness, and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 risk stratification to minimize bias.

RESULTS

A total of 84 of 96 patients in the VEN/HMA cohort were matched with 84 of 147 patients in the CAG cohort. VEN/HMA resulted in a better response than the CAG-based regimens, as indicated by a higher composite complete remission (CRc) rate (82.1% vs. 60.7%; p = .002) and minimal residual disease negativity rate (88.2% vs. 68.2%; p = .009). In patients with an ELN adverse risk, VEN/HMA was associated with a higher CRc rate compared to CAG (80.5% vs. 58.3%; p = .006). VEN/HMA was associated with longer event-free survival (EFS) (median EFS, not reached vs. 4.5 months; p = .0004), whereas overall survival (OS) was comparable between the two cohorts (median OS, not reached vs. 18 months; p = .078).

CONCLUSIONS

The VEN/HMA regimen may result in a better response than CAG-based treatment in older patients with newly diagnosed AML.

摘要

背景

维奈克拉联合低甲基化剂(VEN/HMA)和阿糖胞苷、阿克拉霉素和粒细胞集落刺激因子(CAG)均为低强度方案,适用于老年急性髓系白血病(AML)患者,疗效和安全性良好。尚不清楚 VEN/HMA 方案与 CAG 方案治疗新诊断 AML 的疗效相比如何。

方法

比较新诊断 AML 患者接受 VEN/HMA 治疗的结果与接受 CAG 为基础方案治疗的结果。采用倾向评分匹配法,以诊断时的年龄、性别、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态、身体状况和欧洲白血病网(ELN)2022 风险分层为 1:1 进行匹配,以尽量减少偏倚。

结果

VEN/HMA 组的 96 例患者中共有 84 例与 CAG 组的 147 例患者相匹配。与 CAG 为基础的方案相比,VEN/HMA 方案产生了更好的反应,表现为更高的复合完全缓解率(CRc)(82.1% vs. 60.7%;p=0.002)和更低的微小残留病阴性率(88.2% vs. 68.2%;p=0.009)。在具有 ELN 不良风险的患者中,与 CAG 相比,VEN/HMA 与更高的 CRc 率相关(80.5% vs. 58.3%;p=0.006)。VEN/HMA 与更长的无事件生存(EFS)相关(中位 EFS,未达到 vs. 4.5 个月;p=0.0004),而两组的总生存(OS)无差异(中位 OS,未达到 vs. 18 个月;p=0.078)。

结论

在新诊断的 AML 老年患者中,VEN/HMA 方案可能比 CAG 为基础的治疗方案产生更好的反应。

相似文献

1
Venetoclax plus a hypomethylating agent versus cytarabine, aclarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor chemotherapy as a first-line therapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: A propensity score-matched analysis.维奈托克联合低甲基化药物与阿糖胞苷、阿克拉霉素和粒细胞集落刺激因子化疗作为初治急性髓系白血病的一线治疗:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Cancer. 2024 Jul 15;130(14):2472-2481. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35278. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
The efficacy of the combination of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents versus HAG agents in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective study.维奈托克联合低甲基化剂与 HAG 方案治疗急性髓系白血病患者的疗效:一项回顾性研究。
Hematology. 2024 Dec;29(1):2350319. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2024.2350319. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Venetoclax with decitabine vs intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia: A propensity score matched analysis stratified by risk of treatment-related mortality.维奈托克联合地西他滨与强化化疗治疗急性髓系白血病的疗效比较:基于治疗相关死亡率风险的倾向评分匹配分析。
Am J Hematol. 2021 Mar 1;96(3):282-291. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26061. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
4
A low-dose cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming regimen versus a daunorubicin plus cytarabine regimen as induction therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A propensity score analysis.低剂量阿糖胞苷、阿克拉霉素和粒细胞集落刺激因子预激方案与柔红霉素加阿糖胞苷方案作为老年急性髓系白血病患者诱导治疗的比较:一项倾向评分分析
Leuk Res. 2016 Mar;42:82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.12.013. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
5
Daratumumab and venetoclax combined with CAGE for late R/R T-ALL/LBL patients: Single-arm, open-label, phase I study.达雷妥尤单抗与维奈克拉联合 CAGE 方案治疗晚期复发/难治性 T 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病/淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者:单臂、开放标签、I 期研究。
Ann Hematol. 2024 Aug;103(8):2993-3004. doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-05775-z. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
6
Low-dose cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming regimen versus idarubicin plus cytarabine regimen as induction therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.小剂量阿糖胞苷、阿克拉霉素和粒细胞集落刺激因子预激方案与伊达比星联合阿糖胞苷方案作为老年急性髓系白血病患者诱导治疗的比较
Leuk Lymphoma. 2015 Jun;56(6):1691-7. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.963074. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
7
Cladribine with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, Cytarabine, and Aclarubicin Regimen in Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Phase II Multicenter Study.克拉屈滨联合粒细胞集落刺激因子、阿糖胞苷和阿克拉霉素治疗难治/复发急性髓系白血病的 II 期多中心研究。
Oncologist. 2020 Nov;25(11):e1663-e1670. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0818. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
[Efficacy and safety of venetoclax combined with azacitidine versus CAG regimen combined with decitabine in elderly patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia].维奈克拉联合阿扎胞苷与CAG方案联合地西他滨治疗老年复发急性髓系白血病的疗效与安全性
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 1;61(2):157-163. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20210406-00261.
9
Ten-day decitabine with venetoclax versus intensive chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: A propensity score-matched analysis.地西他滨联合维奈托克与强化化疗治疗复发或难治性急性髓系白血病的 10 天疗程:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Cancer. 2021 Nov 15;127(22):4213-4220. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33814. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
10
[Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy between Hypomenthylating Agents Combined with Venetoclax and Half Dose Priming Regimen in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia].[低甲基化药物联合维奈克拉与半量预激方案治疗初诊老年急性髓系白血病的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Dec;30(6):1631-1636. doi: 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2022.06.001.