Lee Kyu Jin, Kim Yong Kyun, Jeon Kyeongman, Ko Ryoung-Eun, Suh Gee Young, Oh Dong Kyu, Lim Sung Yoon, Lee Yeon Joo, Lee Su Yeon, Park Mi-Hyeon, Lim Chae-Man, Park Sunghoon
Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Department of Infection, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 12;19(3):e0298617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298617. eCollection 2024.
The understanding of shock indices in patients with septic shock is limited, and their values may vary depending on cardiac function.
This prospective cohort study was conducted across 20 university-affiliated hospitals (21 intensive care units [ICUs]). Adult patients (≥19 years) with septic shock admitted to the ICUs during a 29-month period were included. The shock index (SI), diastolic shock index (DSI), modified shock index (MSI), and age shock index (Age-SI) were calculated at sepsis recognition (time zero) and ICU admission. Left ventricular (LV) function was categorized as either normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%) or decreased LVEF (<50%).
Among the 1,194 patients with septic shock, 392 (32.8%) who underwent echocardiography within 24 h of time zero were included in the final analysis (normal LVEF: n = 246; decreased LVEF: n = 146). In patients with normal LVEF, only survivors demonstrated significant improvement in SI, DSI, MSI, and Age-SI values from time zero to ICU admission; however, no notable improvements were found in all patients with decreased LVEF. The completion of vasopressor or fluid bundle components was significantly associated with improved indices in patients with normal LVEF, but not in those with decreased LVEF. In multivariable analysis, each of the four indices at ICU admission was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (P < 0.05) among patients with normal LVEF; however, discrimination power was better in the indices for patients with lower lactate levels (≤ 4.0 mmol/L), compared to those with higher lactate levels.
The SI, DSI, MSI, and Age-SI at ICU admission were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock and normal LVEF, which was not found in those with decreased LVEF. Our study emphasizes the importance of interpreting shock indices in the context of LV function in septic shock.
对感染性休克患者休克指数的了解有限,其数值可能因心功能而异。
这项前瞻性队列研究在20家大学附属医院(21个重症监护病房[ICU])开展。纳入在29个月期间入住ICU的成年感染性休克患者(≥19岁)。在脓毒症识别(零时间)和入住ICU时计算休克指数(SI)、舒张期休克指数(DSI)、改良休克指数(MSI)和年龄休克指数(Age-SI)。左心室(LV)功能分为左心室射血分数正常(LVEF≥50%)或降低(LVEF<50%)。
在1194例感染性休克患者中,392例(32.8%)在零时间后24小时内接受了超声心动图检查,纳入最终分析(LVEF正常:n = 246;LVEF降低:n = 146)。在LVEF正常的患者中,只有幸存者从零时间到入住ICU时SI、DSI、MSI和Age-SI值有显著改善;然而,所有LVEF降低的患者均未发现明显改善。在LVEF正常的患者中,血管活性药物或液体治疗方案的完成与指标改善显著相关,但LVEF降低的患者并非如此。在多变量分析中,入住ICU时的四个指标在LVEF正常的患者中均与院内死亡率显著相关(P<0.05);然而,与乳酸水平较高的患者相比,乳酸水平较低(≤4.0 mmol/L)的患者指标的鉴别能力更好。
入住ICU时的SI、DSI、MSI和Age-SI与感染性休克且LVEF正常患者的院内死亡率显著相关,而LVEF降低的患者未发现此关联。我们的研究强调了在感染性休克中结合LV功能解读休克指数的重要性。