Phoniatrics and Audiology Unit, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova, Treviso, Italy.
Phoniatrics and Audiology Unit, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova, Treviso, Italy.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2024 May-Jun;45(3):104255. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104255. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
The main aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of speech therapy, delivered via tele-practice to patients with dysphonia. A secondary aim was to verify whether a telerehabilitation-only protocol could have a clinical efficacy similar to a combined telerehabilitation and in-person approach.
Thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing telerehabilitation for dysphonia were retrospectively considered. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received combined in-person and telerehabilitation treatment, and those who underwent telerehabilitation only.
Overall, patients included in this study showed a significant improvement in their VHI-10 scores after treatment (p < 0.001). Such an improvement was also significant in both combined therapy and telerehabilitation only groups (p = 0.019, and p = 0.002, respectively). A significant reduction in general degree of dysphonia (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B) and strain (S) scores (p < 0.001, p = 0.012, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively) was noticed over the whole sample after treatment. The same parameters showed a significant improvement also in the combined therapy group, while in the telerehabilitation only group, only G, B and S scores significantly improved. Mean phonation time, Jitter and Shimmer values significantly improved in the overall sample as well as in the combined therapy group. A significantly more favorable spectrographic class relative to the vowel /a/ was found after treatment in the whole sample, as well as in both combined therapy and telerehabilitation only groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.004, respectively).
This study's results seem to support telerehabilitation as a potentially effective tool to administer speech therapy in dysphonic patients, both as a single modality and in combination with traditional in-person sessions. To better characterize the clinical results of telerehabilitation in dysphonia treatment, large-scale prospective investigations are mandatory.
本研究的主要目的是探讨通过远程实践向声音障碍患者提供语音治疗的临床疗效。次要目的是验证仅远程康复方案是否具有与远程康复和亲自治疗相结合类似的临床疗效。
回顾性考虑了 32 名连续接受声音障碍远程康复的患者。患者被分为两组:接受联合亲自和远程康复治疗的患者,以及仅接受远程康复的患者。
总体而言,接受这项研究的患者在治疗后其 VHI-10 评分显著提高(p<0.001)。在联合治疗组和仅远程康复组中,这种改善也是显著的(p=0.019,p=0.002)。整个样本的总体声音障碍程度(G)、粗糙度(R)、气息声(B)和紧张度(S)评分均显著降低(p<0.001,p=0.012,p<0.001,p<0.001,分别)。治疗后,联合治疗组的所有参数也显示出显著改善,而仅远程康复组仅 G、B 和 S 评分显著改善。整个样本以及联合治疗组的平均发音时间、抖动和晃动值均显著改善。整个样本以及联合治疗组和仅远程康复组治疗后元音/a/的频谱类都有显著改善(p<0.001,p=0.002,p=0.004,分别)。
本研究结果似乎支持远程康复作为一种有效的工具,可用于声音障碍患者的语音治疗,既可以作为单一模式,也可以与传统的亲自治疗相结合。为了更好地描述远程康复在声音障碍治疗中的临床效果,需要进行大规模的前瞻性研究。