Suppr超能文献

通过解释性顺序混合方法,在暴露前预防时代对性行为进行行为经济学考察。

A Behavioral Economic Examination of Sexual Behaviors in the Era of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis via Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods.

机构信息

Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S. Main St., Box G-S121-3, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.

Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Apr;53(4):1541-1559. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02822-8. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use may be associated with condom use decisions. The current investigation examined sexual decision-making in the context of PrEP among young adult men who have sex with men (MSM) between 18 and 30 years old, using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. For the quantitative aim, 99 MSM currently taking PrEP (i.e., PrEP-experienced) and 140 MSM not currently taking PrEP (i.e., PrEP-naive) completed an online survey, including the Sexual Delay Discounting Task (SDDT), which captures likelihood of condom use. For the qualitative aim, 15 people from each group were interviewed about their (1) conceptualizations of risky sex and (2) ways they manage their sexual risk. Participants were, on average, 25.69 years old (SD = 3.07) and 64% White. Results from the quantitative aim revealed, controlling for covariates, PrEP-experienced participants exhibited significantly lower likelihood of (1) using an immediately available condom and (2) waiting for a delayed condom (i.e., sexual delay discounting) compared to PrEP-naive participants. Qualitative themes explaining what young adult MSM consider to be risky sex included: (1) any sex as risky sex, (2) risky sex as "sex without a conversation," and (3) risky sex as sex with risk for physical harm. Themes on ways young adult MSM manage sexual risk were classified as proactive, reactive, and passive. Results suggest that PrEP use is related to condom use decisions. Taken together, quantitative differences in sexual delay discounting, but qualitatively similar conceptualizations and management of risky sex, suggest that the SDDT may be a useful tool in sex research to capture processes (i.e., delay discounting) underlying sexual decision-making that may be missed by traditional self-reports. Implications of results, including potentially providing (good quality) condoms with every PrEP prescription, and future research topics are discussed.

摘要

暴露前预防(PrEP)的使用可能与 condom 的使用决策有关。本研究采用解释性顺序混合方法设计,调查了 18 至 30 岁之间有男男性行为的年轻男性(MSM)在 PrEP 背景下的性决策。对于定量目标,99 名正在服用 PrEP 的 MSM(即 PrEP 经验者)和 140 名未服用 PrEP 的 MSM(即 PrEP 未经验者)完成了一项在线调查,包括性延迟折扣任务(SDDT),该任务可捕捉 condom 的使用可能性。对于定性目标,从每个组中随机抽取 15 人,分别对他们的(1)性行为风险的概念化和(2)管理性风险的方式进行访谈。参与者的平均年龄为 25.69 岁(SD=3.07),64%为白人。定量目标的结果显示,控制了协变量后,与 PrEP 未经验者相比,PrEP 经验者使用(1)立即可用 condom 的可能性和(2)等待延迟 condom(即性延迟折扣)的可能性显著降低。年轻 MSM 认为危险性行为的定性主题包括:(1)任何性行为都是危险的,(2)没有对话的性行为是危险的,(3)有身体伤害风险的性行为是危险的。年轻 MSM 管理性行为风险的主题分为主动、被动和被动。结果表明,PrEP 的使用与 condom 的使用决策有关。总的来说,性行为延迟折扣的定量差异,以及对危险性行为的定性概念和管理的差异,表明 SDDT 可能是性研究中捕捉潜在性行为决策过程(即延迟折扣)的有用工具,而这些过程可能会被传统的自我报告所忽视。讨论了结果的意义,包括可能在每一个 PrEP 处方中提供(高质量) condom,以及未来的研究主题。

相似文献

1
A Behavioral Economic Examination of Sexual Behaviors in the Era of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis via Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods.
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Apr;53(4):1541-1559. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02822-8. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
10
Use of cognitive interviews to develop PrEP education for men in New York and Alabama.
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Sep;138:109221. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109221. Epub 2025 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining Associations Between Resilience and PrEP Use Among HIV-negative GBM in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver.
AIDS Behav. 2023 Sep;27(9):3109-3121. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04031-1. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Why do men who have sex with men practice condomless sex? A systematic review and meta-synthesis.
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):850. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07843-z.
4
Measuring Sexual Risk-Taking: A Systematic Review of the Sexual Delay Discounting Task.
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):2899-2920. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02355-y. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
5
The Relationship Between Formal Help-Seeking and Sexual Orientation Among Victims of Domestic Violence.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jan;38(1-2):NP156-NP182. doi: 10.1177/08862605221080150. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
7
The Influence of Social Desirability on Sexual Behavior Surveys: A Review.
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Apr;51(3):1495-1501. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02197-0. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
8
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
9
"Shades of risk": Understanding current PrEP users' sexually transmitted infection perceptions.
AIDS Care. 2022 Mar;34(3):353-358. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2021.1957762. Epub 2021 Jul 25.
10
Sexual discounting: A systematic review of discounting processes and sexual behavior.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Dec;29(6):711-738. doi: 10.1037/pha0000402. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验