Sitler Collin A, Tian Chunqiao, Hamilton Chad A, Richardson Michael T, Chan John K, Kapp Daniel S, Leath Charles A, Casablanca Yovanni, Washington Christina, Chappell Nicole P, Klopp Ann H, Shriver Craig D, Tarney Christopher M, Bateman Nicholas W, Conrads Thomas P, Maxwell George Larry, Phippen Neil T, Darcy Kathleen M
Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA.
Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 6;16(5):1071. doi: 10.3390/cancers16051071.
To investigate IMT use and survival in real-world stage IVB cervical cancer patients outside randomized clinical trials.
Patients diagnosed with stage IVB cervical cancer during 2013-2019 in the National Cancer Database and treated with chemotherapy (CT) ± external beam radiation (EBRT) ± intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) ± IMT were studied. The adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for risk of death were estimated in patients treated with vs. without IMT after applying propensity score analysis to balance the clinical covariates.
There were 3164 evaluable patients, including 969 (31%) who were treated with IMT. The use of IMT increased from 11% in 2013 to 46% in 2019. Age, insurance, facility type, sites of distant metastasis, and type of first-line treatment were independently associated with using IMT. In propensity-score-balanced patients, the median survival was 18.6 vs. 13.1 months for with vs. without IMT ( < 0.001). The AHR was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.64-0.80) for adding IMT overall, 0.72 for IMT + CT, 0.66 for IMT + CT + EBRT, and 0.69 for IMT + CT + EBRT + ICBT. IMT-associated survival improvements were suggested in all subgroups by age, race/ethnicity, comorbidity score, facility type, tumor grade, tumor size, and site of metastasis.
IMT was associated with a consistent survival benefit in real-world patients with stage IVB cervical cancer.
在随机临床试验之外,研究IVB期宫颈癌患者在现实世界中的免疫治疗(IMT)使用情况及生存率。
对2013年至2019年在国家癌症数据库中诊断为IVB期宫颈癌并接受化疗(CT)±外照射放疗(EBRT)±腔内近距离放疗(ICBT)±免疫治疗的患者进行研究。在应用倾向评分分析以平衡临床协变量后,估计接受与未接受免疫治疗患者的死亡风险调整后危险比(AHR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
有3164例可评估患者,其中969例(31%)接受了免疫治疗。免疫治疗的使用从2013年的11%增加到2019年的46%。年龄、保险、机构类型、远处转移部位和一线治疗类型与免疫治疗的使用独立相关。在倾向评分平衡的患者中,接受免疫治疗与未接受免疫治疗的患者中位生存期分别为18.6个月和13.1个月(P<0.001)。总体添加免疫治疗的AHR为0.72(95%CI=0.64-0.80),免疫治疗+化疗为0.72,免疫治疗+化疗+外照射放疗为0.66,免疫治疗+化疗+外照射放疗+腔内近距离放疗为0.69。按年龄、种族/族裔、合并症评分、机构类型、肿瘤分级、肿瘤大小和转移部位划分的所有亚组均显示免疫治疗与生存率提高相关。
在现实世界的IVB期宫颈癌患者中,免疫治疗与持续的生存获益相关。