• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价脑脊液引流对腔内修复术治疗 B 型主动脉夹层后结局的影响。

Systematic review of the effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on outcomes after endovascular type B aortic dissection repair.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University, No. 30, Gaotanyan Road, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, P.R. China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Mar 12;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02603-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13019-024-02603-3
PMID:38475763
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10935911/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present systematic review was to determine whether prophylactic use of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) contributes to a lower rate of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify all relevant studies reported before May 7, 2023. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023441392). The primary outcome was permanent SCI. Secondary outcomes were temporary SCI and 30-day/in-hospital mortality. The data were presented as the pooled event rates (ERs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 1008 studies were screened, of which 34 studies with 2749 patients were included in the present analysis. The mean Downs and Black quality assessment score was 8.71 (range, 5-12). The pooled rate of permanent SCI with prophylactic CSFD was identical to that without prophylactic CSFD (2.0%; 95% CI, 1.0-3.0; P = 0.445). No statistically significant difference was found between the rates of permanent SCI with routine vs. selective prophylactic CSFD (P = 0.596). The pooled rate of temporary SCI was 1.0% (95% CI, 0.00-1.0%). The pooled rate for 30-day or in-hospital mortality was not significantly different (P = 0.525) in patients with prophylactic CSFD (4.0, 95% CI 2.0-6.0) or without prophylactic CSFD (5.0, 95% CI 2.0-7.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic review has shown that prophylactic CSFD was not associated with a lower rate of permanent SCI and 30-day or in-hospital mortality after TEVAR for TBAD.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是确定在胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)治疗 B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD)后,预防性使用脑脊液引流(CSFD)是否会降低脊髓缺血(SCI)的发生率。

方法

系统检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库,以确定截至 2023 年 5 月 7 日之前报告的所有相关研究。按照 PRISMA 指南(PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023441392)进行系统评价。主要结局为永久性 SCI。次要结局为暂时性 SCI 和 30 天/住院死亡率。数据以汇总事件发生率(ER)和 95%置信区间(CI)表示。

结果

共筛选出 1008 项研究,其中 34 项研究共纳入 2749 例患者纳入本分析。平均 Downs 和 Black 质量评估得分为 8.71(范围:5-12)。预防性使用 CSFD 的永久性 SCI 发生率与未预防性使用 CSFD 的发生率相同(2.0%;95%CI:1.0-3.0;P=0.445)。常规与选择性预防性 CSFD 的永久性 SCI 发生率无统计学差异(P=0.596)。30 天或住院死亡率的汇总率在使用预防性 CSFD(4.0,95%CI:2.0-6.0)或未使用预防性 CSFD(5.0,95%CI:2.0-7.0)的患者中无显著差异(P=0.525)。

结论

系统评价表明,在 TEVAR 治疗 TBAD 后,预防性使用 CSFD 与永久性 SCI 和 30 天或住院死亡率的降低无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9291/10935911/fe2feae2a844/13019_2024_2603_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9291/10935911/1488eb026c9b/13019_2024_2603_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9291/10935911/b14652a267c4/13019_2024_2603_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9291/10935911/74f68e4c79b0/13019_2024_2603_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9291/10935911/91f67b6c88db/13019_2024_2603_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9291/10935911/fe2feae2a844/13019_2024_2603_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9291/10935911/1488eb026c9b/13019_2024_2603_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9291/10935911/b14652a267c4/13019_2024_2603_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9291/10935911/74f68e4c79b0/13019_2024_2603_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9291/10935911/91f67b6c88db/13019_2024_2603_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9291/10935911/fe2feae2a844/13019_2024_2603_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review of the effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on outcomes after endovascular type B aortic dissection repair.系统评价脑脊液引流对腔内修复术治疗 B 型主动脉夹层后结局的影响。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Mar 12;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02603-3.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of association of prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage in preventing spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.胸主动脉腔内修复术后预防性脑脊液引流预防脊髓缺血相关性的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;75(4):1478-1489.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.050. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the occurrence of spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.胸主动脉瘤血管内修复术后脊髓缺血发生率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;75(4):1466-1477.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
4
Systematic Review of the Effect of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage on Outcomes After Endovascular Descending Thoracic/Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.系统评价脑脊液引流对腔内修复下行胸/胸腹主动脉瘤术后结局的影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Oct;66(4):501-512. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 12.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of cerebrospinal fluid drain-related mortality and morbidity after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair.分侧开窗-分支型腔内主动脉修复术后脑脊液引流相关死亡率和发病率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):586-594.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.038. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
6
A systematic review of spinal cord injury and cerebrospinal fluid drainage after thoracic aortic endografting.胸主动脉覆膜支架置入术后脊髓损伤和脑脊液引流的系统评价。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Nov;56(5):1438-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.075. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
7
Temporary Reperfusion of the Aneurysm Sac as a Prevention of Spinal Cord Ischemia After Endovascular Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.胸主动脉腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗后,通过暂时再灌注瘤腔预防脊髓缺血:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Jun;30(3):323-335. doi: 10.1177/15266028221082008. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
Positive impact of standardized perioperative management on spinal cord ischemia rate during endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms.标准化围手术期管理对胸腹主动脉瘤血管腔内修复术中脊髓缺血发生率的积极影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.02.047. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
9
Cerebrospinal fluid drainage for thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.用于胸主动脉和胸腹主动脉瘤手术的脑脊液引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD003635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003635.pub3.
10
Editor's Choice - Outcomes of Endovascular Repair Confined to the Ascending Thoracic Aorta: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.编辑推荐——局限于升主动脉的血管腔内修复术的结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2025 Apr;69(4):531-544. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.049. Epub 2024 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention and Management of Spinal Cord Ischemia After Aortic Surgery: An Umbrella Review.主动脉手术后脊髓缺血的预防与管理:一项伞状综述
Brain Sci. 2025 Apr 17;15(4):409. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15040409.

本文引用的文献

1
Prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage and spinal cord ischemia in thoracic and thoracoabdominal endovascular procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胸段及胸腹段血管腔内手术中预防性脑脊液引流与脊髓缺血:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Sep 28;12(5):392-408. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-scp-17. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
2
Protecting the spinal cord during thoracic endovascular aortic repair-who should place the spinal drain?在胸段血管腔内主动脉修复术中保护脊髓——应由谁放置脊髓引流管?
J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun 30;9(2):186-190. doi: 10.21037/jss-22-116. Epub 2023 May 30.
3
Systematic Review of the Effect of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage on Outcomes After Endovascular Descending Thoracic/Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.
系统评价脑脊液引流对腔内修复下行胸/胸腹主动脉瘤术后结局的影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Oct;66(4):501-512. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage for Prevention of Spinal Cord Ischemia in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Surgery-Pros and Cons.胸段血管腔内主动脉手术中脑脊液引流预防脊髓缺血的利弊
Aorta (Stamford). 2022 Dec;10(6):290-297. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757792. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
5
Rescue therapy for symptomatic spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.胸主动脉腔内修复术后脊髓缺血症状的挽救性治疗。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;168(1):15-25.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.10.045. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
6
Strategies for prevention and treatment of spinal cord ischemia during F/BEVAR.腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术中脊髓缺血的预防和治疗策略。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;35(3):297-305. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
7
Aggressive use of prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage to prevent spinal cord ischemia during thoracic endovascular aortic repair is not supportive.在胸主动脉腔内修复术中积极使用预防性脑脊液引流以预防脊髓缺血并不支持。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Nov 3;62(6). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac441.
8
Safety of cerebrospinal fluid drainage for spinal cord ischemia prevention in thoracic endovascular aortic repair.在胸段血管腔内主动脉修复术中,脑脊液引流预防脊髓缺血的安全性。
JTCVS Tech. 2022 May 11;14:9-28. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.05.001. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Multicenter Study to Evaluate Endovascular Repair of Extent I-III Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms Without Prophylactic Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage.评估I-III型胸腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术且不进行预防性脑脊液引流的多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):e396-e404. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005653. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
Celiac Artery Coverage After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Procedure: A Meta-Analysis of Early and Late Results.胸主动脉腔内修复术后腹腔干动脉覆盖:早期和晚期结果的荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Aug;30(4):499-509. doi: 10.1177/15266028221090443. Epub 2022 Apr 25.