• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较德瓦鲁单抗与甲氨蝶呤治疗强效皮质类固醇外用治疗失败的外阴扁平苔藓患者的疗效和安全性:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验研究方案。

The efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib compared to methotrexate, in patients with vulvar lichen planus who have failed topical therapy with potent corticosteroids: a study protocol for a single-centre double-blinded randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.

The University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Mar 12;25(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08022-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08022-y
PMID:38475894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10929110/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vulvar lichen planus (VLP) is a chronic vulvar dermatosis that is difficult to treat and can severely impair quality of life in the absence of adequate treatment. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to direct therapy for VLP. This randomised controlled trial will be the first double-blinded study comparing systemic treatments in VLP and aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of deucravacitinib compared to methotrexate, in patients with VLP who have failed treatment with potent topical corticosteroids.

METHODS

A total of 116 women aged ≥ 18 years with moderate to severe VLP (Genital Erosive Lichen Planus (GELP) score ≥ 5) will be recruited. All participants will initially be treated with Diprosone® OV daily, and their outcome will be assessed using the GELP score. At 8 weeks' follow-up, responders (GELP < 5) will be continued on Diprosone® OV. Non-responders (GELP ≥ 5) will be randomised 1:1 in a blinded fashion to receive (i) methotrexate 10 mg weekly + placebo tablet twice daily + folic acid 5 mg weekly or (ii) deucravacitinib 6 mg twice daily + placebo tablet weekly + folic acid 5 mg weekly. The primary endpoint is the difference in the mean change of GELP scores from baseline to week 32 between deucravacitinib and methotrexate groups.

DISCUSSION

High-quality evidence guiding the management of women with VLP is lacking. Once completed, this will be the first double-blinded RCT to compare systemic treatments in VLP. The results of this study will provide valuable, high-quality data to guide second-line therapy options for VLP that is recalcitrant to potent topical corticosteroids.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12623000682640. Registered on 26 June 2023.

摘要

背景

外阴硬化性苔藓(VLP)是一种难以治疗的慢性外阴皮肤病,如果没有足够的治疗,会严重影响生活质量。目前缺乏高质量的证据来指导 VLP 的治疗。这项随机对照试验将是第一项比较 VLP 系统治疗的双盲研究,旨在研究与甲氨蝶呤相比,在接受强效外用皮质类固醇治疗失败的 VLP 患者中,德夸鲁瓦替尼的安全性和有效性。

方法

共招募 116 名年龄≥18 岁、患有中重度 VLP(外阴侵蚀性苔藓评分[GELP]≥5)的女性。所有参与者最初将每天接受 Diprosone® OV 治疗,并使用 GELP 评分评估他们的疗效。在 8 周的随访中,GELP<5 的患者将继续接受 Diprosone® OV 治疗。GELP≥5 的非应答者将以 1:1 的比例进行盲法随机分组,分别接受(i)甲氨蝶呤 10mg 每周+安慰剂片剂每日两次+叶酸 5mg 每周或(ii)德夸鲁瓦替尼 6mg 每日两次+安慰剂片剂每周+叶酸 5mg 每周。主要终点是德夸鲁瓦替尼组和甲氨蝶呤组从基线到第 32 周时 GELP 评分的平均变化差异。

讨论

缺乏指导 VLP 女性管理的高质量证据。一旦完成,这将是第一项比较 VLP 系统治疗的双盲 RCT。该研究的结果将为指导对强效外用皮质类固醇耐药的 VLP 的二线治疗选择提供有价值的高质量数据。

试验注册

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心 ACTRN12623000682640。于 2023 年 6 月 26 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aa7/10929110/c2eb2dea17a0/13063_2024_8022_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aa7/10929110/00c235a07722/13063_2024_8022_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aa7/10929110/c2eb2dea17a0/13063_2024_8022_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aa7/10929110/00c235a07722/13063_2024_8022_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aa7/10929110/c2eb2dea17a0/13063_2024_8022_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib compared to methotrexate, in patients with vulvar lichen planus who have failed topical therapy with potent corticosteroids: a study protocol for a single-centre double-blinded randomised controlled trial.比较德瓦鲁单抗与甲氨蝶呤治疗强效皮质类固醇外用治疗失败的外阴扁平苔藓患者的疗效和安全性:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Mar 12;25(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08022-y.
2
Apremilast for genital erosive lichen planus in women (the AP-GELP Study): study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial.阿普米司特治疗女性生殖器糜烂性扁平苔藓(AP-GELP 研究):一项随机安慰剂对照临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jul 20;22(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05428-w.
3
Vulvovaginal photodynamic therapy vs. topical corticosteroids in genital erosive lichen planus: a randomized controlled trial.外阴阴道光动力疗法与局部皮质类固醇治疗生殖器糜烂性扁平苔藓的随机对照试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Nov;173(5):1156-62. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14033. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
4
Comparing quality of life in women with vulvovaginal lichen planus treated with topical and systemic treatments using the vulvar quality of life index.比较采用外阴生活质量指数评估局部和全身治疗外阴硬化性苔藓患者的生活质量。
Australas J Dermatol. 2023 May;64(2):e125-e134. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14032. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
5
Systemic therapy for vulval Erosive Lichen Planus (the 'hELP' trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.外阴糜烂性扁平苔藓的全身治疗(“hELP”试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Jan 4;17:2. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1133-z.
6
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites.针对累及黏膜部位的糜烂性扁平苔藓的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD008092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008092.pub2.
7
Identifying predictors of systemic immunosuppressive treatment of vulvovaginal lichen planus: A retrospective cohort study of 122 women.识别外阴阴道扁平苔藓全身免疫抑制治疗的预测因素:122 例女性的回顾性队列研究。
Australas J Dermatol. 2022 Aug;63(3):335-343. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13851. Epub 2022 May 2.
8
ChemoPROphyLaxIs with hydroxychloroquine For covId-19 infeCtious disease (PROLIFIC) to prevent covid-19 infection in frontline healthcare workers: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.羟氯喹用于 COVID-19 传染病的化学预防(PROLIFIC)以预防一线医护人员感染 COVID-19:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jul 2;21(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04543-4.
9
Effectiveness of Oral Methotrexate Therapy versus Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy in Treatment of Generalised Lichen Planus.口服甲氨蝶呤疗法与全身用皮质类固醇疗法治疗泛发性扁平苔藓的疗效比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018 Jul;28(7):505-508. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.07.505.
10
Cepharanthine and Oral Lichen Planus Efficacy (COLE) study: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of cepharanthine with topical corticosteroids in oral lichen planus.西柏三嗪和口腔扁平苔藓疗效(COLE)研究:一项多中心随机对照研究方案,评估西柏三嗪联合局部皮质类固醇治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效和安全性。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 16;13(8):e074279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074279.

引用本文的文献

1
SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.《SPIRIT 2025解释与阐述:随机试验方案更新指南》
BMJ. 2025 Apr 28;389:e081660. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081660.
2
Erosive Lichen Planus Treated With Tofacitinib: A Case Series of 23 Patients.托法替布治疗糜烂性扁平苔藓:23例病例系列
Australas J Dermatol. 2025 Jun;66(4):234-237. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14452. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
3
Translational Research in Oral Lichen Planus: From Laboratory Discoveries to Clinical Applications.口腔扁平苔藓的转化研究:从实验室发现到临床应用

本文引用的文献

1
Deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 Program fOr Evaluation of TYK2 inhibitor psoriasis second trial.德瓦鲁单抗对比安慰剂和阿普米司特治疗中重度斑块状银屑病:为期 52 周、随机、双盲、III 期方案 fOr 评估 TYK2 抑制剂银屑病二次试验的疗效和安全性结果。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 Jan;88(1):40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.08.061. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
2
Quality of life impact and treatment response in vulval disease: Comparison of 3 common conditions using the Vulval Quality of Life Index.外阴疾病的生活质量影响和治疗反应:使用外阴生活质量指数比较 3 种常见疾病。
Australas J Dermatol. 2022 Nov;63(4):e320-e328. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13898. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
3
Cureus. 2024 Oct 14;16(10):e71462. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71462. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Vulvar Inflammatory Dermatoses: New Approaches for Diagnosis and Treatment.外阴炎性皮肤病:诊断与治疗的新方法
Cutis. 2024 Aug;114(2):37-40. doi: 10.12788/cutis.1064.
Deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 trial.德瓦鲁单抗对比安慰剂和阿普米司特治疗中重度斑块型银屑病:来自 52 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 3 期 POETYK PSO-1 试验的疗效和安全性结果。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 Jan;88(1):29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
4
Efficacy and safety of selective TYK2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, in a phase II trial in psoriatic arthritis.在一项针对银屑病关节炎的 II 期临床试验中,选择性 TYK2 抑制剂德瓦鲁单抗的疗效和安全性。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jun;81(6):815-822. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221664. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
5
Successful treatment of vulvovaginal lichen planus with tildrakizumab: A case series of 24 patients.成功使用替度鲁单抗治疗外阴阴道扁平苔藓:24 例病例系列。
Australas J Dermatol. 2022 May;63(2):251-255. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13793. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Apremilast for genital erosive lichen planus in women (the AP-GELP Study): study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial.阿普米司特治疗女性生殖器糜烂性扁平苔藓(AP-GELP 研究):一项随机安慰剂对照临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jul 20;22(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05428-w.
7
The use of hydroxychloroquine as a systemic treatment in erosive lichen planus of the vulva and vagina.羟氯喹作为外阴和阴道糜烂性扁平苔藓全身治疗的应用。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Jul;185(1):201-203. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19870. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
8
Quality of life of women with untreated vulval lichen sclerosus assessed with vulval quality of life index (VQLI).采用外阴生活质量指数(VQLI)评估未经治疗的外阴硬化性苔藓女性的生活质量。
Australas J Dermatol. 2021 May;62(2):177-182. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13530. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
9
Forming diagnostic criteria for vulvar lichen planus.制定外阴硬化性苔藓的诊断标准。
Australas J Dermatol. 2020 Nov;61(4):324-329. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13350. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
10
Vulvar malignancy in biopsy-proven vulval lichen planus: A retrospective review of 105 cases.活检证实为外阴扁平苔藓的外阴恶性肿瘤:105例回顾性研究
Australas J Dermatol. 2020 Nov;61(4):386-388. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13368. Epub 2020 Jun 24.