• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服甲氨蝶呤疗法与全身用皮质类固醇疗法治疗泛发性扁平苔藓的疗效比较

Effectiveness of Oral Methotrexate Therapy versus Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy in Treatment of Generalised Lichen Planus.

作者信息

Bakhtiar Rabeeka, Noor Sahibzada Mahmood, Paracha Muhammad Majid

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018 Jul;28(7):505-508. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.07.505.

DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2018.07.505
PMID:29950252
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of oral methotrexate versus systemic corticosteroids in treatment of lichen planus.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

Department of Dermatology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar from September 2013 to February 2014.

METHODOLOGY

Patients with generalised lichen planus involving at least 20% of total body area diagnosed clinically and were randomly allocated into two equal groups by lottery method. Patients in group A were subjected to oral methotrexate 10 mg once weekly for eight weeks with standard monitoring of full blood count and liver and renal function tests. Patients in group B were subjected to oral corticosteroids 40 mg for eight weeks taken daily than tapered according to the protocol. The results were assessed at baseline and at the eighth week after starting the treatment. The responses were analysed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and sorted into four categories: 0-3 = poor response, 4-5 = moderate, 6-7 = good, and >7 excellent response. Chi-square test was applied to compare the efficacy in two groups with significance of less than or equal to 0.05.

RESULTS

Group A (methotrexate) had 47 (60%) male patients and 32 (40%) female patients. Group B (oral corticosteroids) had 51 (64%) male patients and 28 (36%) females. Group A 55 (70%) patients had lichen planus in <50% of the body; whereas in group B 53 (67%) patients had lichen planus in <50% of the body. Methotrexate was effective in 63 (80%) patients; whereas, oral corticosteroid was effective in 57 (72%) patients. No remarkable side effects were observed with either agent.

CONCLUSION

Methotrexate is more efficacious than systemic corticosteroids, but the effect is not statistically significant.

摘要

目的

比较口服甲氨蝶呤与全身用皮质类固醇治疗扁平苔藓的疗效。

研究设计

随机对照试验。

研究地点及时间

2013年9月至2014年2月,白沙瓦市雷丁夫人医院皮肤科。

方法

临床诊断为全身扁平苔藓且累及至少20%体表面积的患者,通过抽签法随机分为两组。A组患者口服甲氨蝶呤10毫克,每周一次,共八周,同时对全血细胞计数及肝肾功能进行标准监测。B组患者口服皮质类固醇40毫克,每日一次,共八周,然后按方案逐渐减量。在治疗开始时的基线及第八周评估结果。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)分析反应,并分为四类:0 - 3 = 反应差,4 - 5 = 中等,6 - 7 = 良好,>7 = 优秀反应。应用卡方检验比较两组疗效,显著性水平小于或等于0.05。

结果

A组(甲氨蝶呤组)有47名(60%)男性患者和32名(40%)女性患者。B组(口服皮质类固醇组)有51名(64%)男性患者和28名(36%)女性患者。A组55名(70%)患者的扁平苔藓累及体表面积<50%;而B组53名(6...%)患者的扁平苔藓累及体表面积<50%。甲氨蝶呤对63名(80%)患者有效;而口服皮质类固醇对57名(72%)患者有效。两种药物均未观察到明显副作用。

结论

甲氨蝶呤比全身用皮质类固醇更有效,但效果无统计学显著性差异。 (注:原文中“whereas in group B 53 (67%) patients had lichen planus in <50% of the body.”中“67%”疑似有误,根据前文逻辑推测应为“67%”,译文已按推测修正。)

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Oral Methotrexate Therapy versus Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy in Treatment of Generalised Lichen Planus.口服甲氨蝶呤疗法与全身用皮质类固醇疗法治疗泛发性扁平苔藓的疗效比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018 Jul;28(7):505-508. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.07.505.
2
Efficacy and safety of oral methotrexate versus oral mini pulse betamethasone therapy in the treatment of lichen planus: a comparative study.口服甲氨蝶呤与口服小剂量脉冲倍他米松治疗扁平苔藓的疗效和安全性:一项对照研究。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Nov;33(7):3039-3046. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2104446. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
3
Methotrexate for treatment of lichen planus: old drug, new indication.甲氨蝶呤治疗扁平苔藓:老药新适应证。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Mar;27(3):e410-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04654.x. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
4
The efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib compared to methotrexate, in patients with vulvar lichen planus who have failed topical therapy with potent corticosteroids: a study protocol for a single-centre double-blinded randomised controlled trial.比较德瓦鲁单抗与甲氨蝶呤治疗强效皮质类固醇外用治疗失败的外阴扁平苔藓患者的疗效和安全性:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Mar 12;25(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08022-y.
5
A prospective observational study to compare efficacy of topical triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% oral paste, oral methotrexate, and a combination of topical triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% and oral methotrexate in moderate to severe oral lichen planus.一项前瞻性观察研究比较了 0.1%醋酸曲安奈德口腔软膏、口服甲氨蝶呤和 0.1%醋酸曲安奈德口腔软膏联合口服甲氨蝶呤治疗中重度口腔扁平苔藓的疗效。
Dermatol Ther. 2018 Jan;31(1). doi: 10.1111/dth.12563. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
6
Comparative efficacy of methotrexate and mini pulse betamethasone in the treatment of lichen planus.甲氨蝶呤与小剂量脉冲式倍他米松治疗扁平苔藓的疗效比较
Mymensingh Med J. 2013 Oct;22(4):787-97.
7
Evaluation of photodynamic therapy in treatment of oral erosive lichen planus in comparison with topically applied corticosteroids.评价光动力疗法与局部应用皮质类固醇治疗口腔糜烂性扁平苔藓的疗效。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2017 Sep;19:56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
8
Erosive and generalized lichen planus responsive to azathioprine.对硫唑嘌呤有反应的糜烂性和泛发性扁平苔藓
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1996 Jan;21(1):56-7.
9
Acitretin for the management of generalized cutaneous lichen planus.阿维A用于泛发性皮肤扁平苔藓的治疗。
Dermatol Online J. 2014 Sep 16;20(9):13030/qt2m36z4jm.
10
Clinical observation on the treatment of oral lichen planus with total glucosides of paeony capsule combined with corticosteroids.白芍总苷胶囊联合糖皮质激素治疗口腔扁平苔藓的临床观察
Int Immunopharmacol. 2016 Jul;36:106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.03.035. Epub 2016 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy And Safety Of Low-Dose Methotrexate In Generalized And Recalcitrant Lichen Planus: A Retrospective Study At A Tertiary Care Center.低剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗泛发性及顽固性扁平苔藓的疗效与安全性:一项三级医疗中心的回顾性研究
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024 Oct 30;14(4):e2024220. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1404a220.
2
Lichen planus-the role of age and gender in clinical appearance and treatment : A narrative review.扁平苔藓——年龄和性别在临床表现及治疗中的作用:一项叙述性综述
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2024 Nov 12. doi: 10.1007/s10354-024-01057-5.
3
Fractal Dimension and Texture Analysis of Lesion Autofluorescence in the Evaluation of Oral Lichen Planus Treatment Effectiveness.
口腔扁平苔藓治疗效果评估中病损自体荧光的分形维数与纹理分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 21;14(18):5448. doi: 10.3390/ma14185448.
4
Interventions for treating oral lichen planus: corticosteroid therapies.治疗口腔扁平苔藓的干预措施:皮质类固醇疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 28;2(2):CD001168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001168.pub3.