Suppr超能文献

口服甲氨蝶呤疗法与全身用皮质类固醇疗法治疗泛发性扁平苔藓的疗效比较

Effectiveness of Oral Methotrexate Therapy versus Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy in Treatment of Generalised Lichen Planus.

作者信息

Bakhtiar Rabeeka, Noor Sahibzada Mahmood, Paracha Muhammad Majid

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018 Jul;28(7):505-508. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.07.505.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of oral methotrexate versus systemic corticosteroids in treatment of lichen planus.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

Department of Dermatology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar from September 2013 to February 2014.

METHODOLOGY

Patients with generalised lichen planus involving at least 20% of total body area diagnosed clinically and were randomly allocated into two equal groups by lottery method. Patients in group A were subjected to oral methotrexate 10 mg once weekly for eight weeks with standard monitoring of full blood count and liver and renal function tests. Patients in group B were subjected to oral corticosteroids 40 mg for eight weeks taken daily than tapered according to the protocol. The results were assessed at baseline and at the eighth week after starting the treatment. The responses were analysed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and sorted into four categories: 0-3 = poor response, 4-5 = moderate, 6-7 = good, and >7 excellent response. Chi-square test was applied to compare the efficacy in two groups with significance of less than or equal to 0.05.

RESULTS

Group A (methotrexate) had 47 (60%) male patients and 32 (40%) female patients. Group B (oral corticosteroids) had 51 (64%) male patients and 28 (36%) females. Group A 55 (70%) patients had lichen planus in <50% of the body; whereas in group B 53 (67%) patients had lichen planus in <50% of the body. Methotrexate was effective in 63 (80%) patients; whereas, oral corticosteroid was effective in 57 (72%) patients. No remarkable side effects were observed with either agent.

CONCLUSION

Methotrexate is more efficacious than systemic corticosteroids, but the effect is not statistically significant.

摘要

目的

比较口服甲氨蝶呤与全身用皮质类固醇治疗扁平苔藓的疗效。

研究设计

随机对照试验。

研究地点及时间

2013年9月至2014年2月,白沙瓦市雷丁夫人医院皮肤科。

方法

临床诊断为全身扁平苔藓且累及至少20%体表面积的患者,通过抽签法随机分为两组。A组患者口服甲氨蝶呤10毫克,每周一次,共八周,同时对全血细胞计数及肝肾功能进行标准监测。B组患者口服皮质类固醇40毫克,每日一次,共八周,然后按方案逐渐减量。在治疗开始时的基线及第八周评估结果。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)分析反应,并分为四类:0 - 3 = 反应差,4 - 5 = 中等,6 - 7 = 良好,>7 = 优秀反应。应用卡方检验比较两组疗效,显著性水平小于或等于0.05。

结果

A组(甲氨蝶呤组)有47名(60%)男性患者和32名(40%)女性患者。B组(口服皮质类固醇组)有51名(64%)男性患者和28名(36%)女性患者。A组55名(70%)患者的扁平苔藓累及体表面积<50%;而B组53名(6...%)患者的扁平苔藓累及体表面积<50%。甲氨蝶呤对63名(80%)患者有效;而口服皮质类固醇对57名(72%)患者有效。两种药物均未观察到明显副作用。

结论

甲氨蝶呤比全身用皮质类固醇更有效,但效果无统计学显著性差异。 (注:原文中“whereas in group B 53 (67%) patients had lichen planus in <50% of the body.”中“67%”疑似有误,根据前文逻辑推测应为“67%”,译文已按推测修正。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验