Munns Lydia B, Demnitz-King Harriet, André Claire, Rehel Stéphane, Ourry Valentin, de La Sayette Vincent, Vivien Denis, Chételat Gaël, Rauchs Géraldine, Marchant Natalie L
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Psychology, York University, York, UK.
Nat Sci Sleep. 2024 Mar 5;16:233-245. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S441509. eCollection 2024.
Poor sleep and high levels of repetitive negative thinking (RNT), including future-directed (ie, worry) and past-directed (ie, brooding) negative thoughts, have been associated with markers of dementia risk. The relationship between RNT and sleep health in older adults is unknown. This study aimed to investigate this association and its specificities including multiple dimensions of objective and subjective sleep.
This study used a cross sectional quantitative design with baseline data from 127 cognitively healthy older adults (mean age 69.4 ± 3.8 years; 63% female) who took part in the Age-Well clinical trial, France. RNT (ie, worry and brooding) levels were measured using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Rumination Response Scale (brooding subscale). Polysomnography was used to assess sleep objectively, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the St. Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaire were used to measure sleep subjectively. In primary analyses the associations between RNT and sleep (ie, objective sleep duration, fragmentation and efficiency and subjective sleep disturbance) were assessed via adjusted regressions.
Higher levels of RNT were associated with poorer objective sleep efficiency (worry: β=-0.32, <0.001; brooding: β=-0.26, =0.002), but not objective sleep duration, fragmentation, or subjective sleep disturbance. Additional analyses, however, revealed differences in levels of worry between those with short, compared with typical and long objective sleep durations ( < 0.05).
In cognitively healthy older adults, RNT was associated with sleep characteristics that have been implicated in increased dementia risk. It will take additional research to ascertain the causal link between RNT and sleep characteristics and how they ultimately relate to the risk of developing dementia.
睡眠不佳和高水平的重复性消极思维(RNT),包括指向未来(即担忧)和指向过去(即沉思)的消极想法,已与痴呆风险标志物相关联。老年人中RNT与睡眠健康之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查这种关联及其特异性,包括客观和主观睡眠的多个维度。
本研究采用横断面定量设计,使用来自法国参与“安享晚年”临床试验的127名认知健康老年人(平均年龄69.4±3.8岁;63%为女性)的基线数据。使用宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷和沉思反应量表(沉思子量表)测量RNT(即担忧和沉思)水平。采用多导睡眠图客观评估睡眠,并使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数和圣玛丽医院睡眠问卷主观测量睡眠。在初步分析中,通过调整回归评估RNT与睡眠(即客观睡眠时间、片段化和效率以及主观睡眠障碍)之间的关联。
较高水平的RNT与较差的客观睡眠效率相关(担忧:β=-0.32,<0.001;沉思:β=-0.26,=0.002),但与客观睡眠时间、片段化或主观睡眠障碍无关。然而,进一步分析发现,客观睡眠时间短的人与典型和长客观睡眠时间的人相比,担忧水平存在差异(<0.05)。
在认知健康的老年人中,RNT与痴呆风险增加所涉及的睡眠特征相关。需要进一步研究以确定RNT与睡眠特征之间的因果联系,以及它们最终如何与患痴呆症的风险相关。