Suppr超能文献

担忧与反复沉思:与老年人认知和身体健康的关联

Worry and ruminative brooding: associations with cognitive and physical health in older adults.

作者信息

Morse Rachel M, Koutsoubelis Freya, Whitfield Tim, Demnitz-King Harriet, Ourry Valentin, Stott Josh, Chocat Anne, Devouge Eglantine Ferrand, Walker Zuzana, Klimecki Olga, Collette Fabienne, Chetelat Gael, Gonneaud Julie, Poisnel Geraldine, Marchant Natalie L

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Normandy University, UNICAEN, INSERM, U1237, PhIND "Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders", NeuroPresage Team, Cyceron, Caen, France.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 3;15:1332398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332398. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mental health conditions are associated with cognition and physical function in older adults. We examined whether worry and ruminative brooding, key symptoms of certain mental health conditions, are related to subjective and/or objective measures of cognitive and physical (cardiovascular) health.

METHODS

We used baseline data from 282 participants from the SCD-Well and Age-Well trials (178 female; age = 71.1 years). We measured worry and ruminative brooding using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Ruminative Response Scale-brooding subscale. We assessed subjective physical health using the WHOQOL-Bref physical subscale, and objective physical health via blood pressure and modified versions of the Framingham Risk Score and Charlson Comorbidity Index. With subjective and objective cognition, we utilized the Cognitive Difficulties Scale and a global composite (modified Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite, PACC5, with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV, category fluency, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale-2, and either the California Verbal Learning Test or the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test). We conducted linear regressions, adjusted for education, age, sex and cohort.

RESULTS

Worry and ruminative brooding were negatively associated with subjective physical health (worry:  = -0.245, 95%CI -0.357 to -0.133,  < 0.001; ruminative brooding:  = -0.224, 95%CI -0.334 to -0.113,  < 0.001) and subjective cognitive difficulties (worry:  = 0.196, 95%CI 0.091 to 0.302,  < 0.001; ruminative brooding:  = 0.239, 95%CI 0.133 to 0.346,  < 0.001). We did not observe associations between worry or ruminative brooding and any measure of objective health.

DISCUSSION

Worry and ruminative brooding may be common mechanisms associated with subjective but not objective health. Alternatively, cognitively unimpaired older adults may become aware of subtle changes not captured by objective measures used in this study. Interventions reducing worry and ruminative brooding may promote subjective physical and cognitive health; however, more research is needed to determine causality of the relationships.

摘要

引言

心理健康状况与老年人的认知及身体功能相关。我们研究了担忧和反复沉思,这两种特定心理健康状况的关键症状,是否与认知和身体(心血管)健康的主观和/或客观指标相关。

方法

我们使用了来自SCD-Well和Age-Well试验的282名参与者的基线数据(178名女性;年龄 = 71.1岁)。我们使用宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷和反复反应量表-沉思子量表来测量担忧和反复沉思。我们使用世界卫生组织生活质量简表身体领域子量表评估主观身体健康,并通过血压以及弗明汉风险评分和查尔森合并症指数的修订版评估客观身体健康。对于主观和客观认知,我们使用认知困难量表和一个综合指标(修订的临床前阿尔茨海默病认知综合指标PACC5,结合韦氏成人智力量表-IV、类别流畅性、马蒂斯痴呆评定量表-2,以及加利福尼亚言语学习测验或雷伊听觉言语学习测验)。我们进行了线性回归分析,并对教育程度、年龄、性别和队列进行了调整。

结果

担忧和反复沉思与主观身体健康呈负相关(担忧:β = -0.245,95%置信区间 -0.357至-0.133,p < 0.001;反复沉思:β = -0.224,95%置信区间 -0.334至-0.113,p < 0.001),与主观认知困难呈正相关(担忧:β = 0.196,95%置信区间 0.091至0.302,p < 0.001;反复沉思:β = 0.239,95%置信区间 0.133至0.346,p < 0.001)。我们未观察到担忧或反复沉思与任何客观健康指标之间存在关联。

讨论

担忧和反复沉思可能是与主观而非客观健康相关的常见机制。或者,认知未受损的老年人可能意识到了本研究中客观测量未捕捉到的细微变化。减少担忧和反复沉思的干预措施可能会促进主观身体和认知健康;然而,需要更多研究来确定这些关系的因果性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3423/11252046/eb02467325f9/fpsyg-15-1332398-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验