Erichsen Dorit W, Pokharel Pratik, Kyrø Cecilie, Schullehner Jörg, Zhong Liezhou, Bondonno Catherine P, Dalgaard Frederik, Fjeldstad Hendriksen Peter, Sigsgaard Torben, Hodgson Jonathan M, Olsen Anja, Tjønneland Anne, Bondonno Nicola P
Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Front Nutr. 2024 Feb 27;11:1326991. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1326991. eCollection 2024.
The dietary source and intake levels of nitrate and nitrite may govern its deleterious versus beneficial effects on human health. Existing evidence on detailed source-specific intake is limited. The objectives of this study were to assess nitrate and nitrite intakes from different dietary sources (plant-based foods, animal-based foods, and water), characterize the background diets of participants with low and high intakes, and investigate how sociodemographic and lifestyle factors associate with intake levels.
In the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health Cohort, sociodemographic and lifestyle information was obtained from participants at enrolment (1993-1997). Source-dependent nitrate and nitrite intakes were calculated using comprehensive food composition databases, with tap water nitrate intakes estimated via the national drinking water quality monitoring database linked with participants' residential addresses from 1978 to 2016. Underlying dietary patterns were examined using radar plots comparing high to low consumers while sociodemographic predictors of source-dependent nitrate intakes were investigated using linear regression models.
In a Danish cohort of 55,754 participants aged 50-65 at enrolment, the median [IQR] intakes of dietary nitrate and nitrite were 58.13 [44.27-74.90] mg/d and 1.79 [1.43-2.21] mg/d, respectively. Plant-based foods accounted for ~76% of nitrate intake, animal-based foods ~10%, and water ~5%. Nitrite intake was sourced roughly equally from plants and animals. Higher plant-sourced nitrate intake was associated with healthier lifestyles, better dietary patterns, more physical activity, higher education, lower age and lower BMI. Females and participants who had never smoked also had significantly higher plant-sourced nitrate intakes. Higher water-sourced nitrate intake was linked to sociodemographic risk factors (smoking, obesity, lower education). Patterns for animal-sourced nitrate were less clear.
Participants with higher plant-sourced nitrate intakes tend to be healthier while participants with higher water-sourced nitrate intakes tended to be unhealthier than their low consuming counterparts. Future research in this cohort should account for the sociodemographic and dietary predictors of source-specific nitrate intake we have identified.
硝酸盐和亚硝酸盐的饮食来源及摄入量可能决定其对人类健康的有害或有益影响。关于具体来源特定摄入量的现有证据有限。本研究的目的是评估来自不同饮食来源(植物性食物、动物性食物和水)的硝酸盐和亚硝酸盐摄入量,描述低摄入量和高摄入量参与者的背景饮食,并调查社会人口统计学和生活方式因素与摄入量水平之间的关联。
在丹麦饮食、癌症与健康队列研究中,在入组时(1993 - 1997年)从参与者处获取社会人口统计学和生活方式信息。使用综合食物成分数据库计算依赖来源的硝酸盐和亚硝酸盐摄入量,通过与1978年至2016年参与者居住地址相关联的国家饮用水质量监测数据库估算自来水硝酸盐摄入量。使用雷达图比较高消费者和低消费者来检查潜在的饮食模式,同时使用线性回归模型研究依赖来源的硝酸盐摄入量的社会人口统计学预测因素。
在一个入组时年龄为50 - 65岁的55754名丹麦队列参与者中,饮食硝酸盐和亚硝酸盐的中位数[四分位间距]摄入量分别为58.13[44.27 - 74.90]mg/天和1.79[1.43 - 2.21]mg/天。植物性食物占硝酸盐摄入量的约76%,动物性食物约占10%,水约占5%。亚硝酸盐摄入量大致平均来自植物和动物。较高的植物源硝酸盐摄入量与更健康的生活方式、更好的饮食模式、更多的身体活动、更高的教育水平、更低的年龄和更低体重指数相关。女性和从不吸烟的参与者植物源硝酸盐摄入量也显著更高。较高的水源硝酸盐摄入量与社会人口统计学风险因素(吸烟、肥胖、较低教育水平)相关。动物性硝酸盐的模式不太明确。
植物源硝酸盐摄入量较高的参与者往往更健康,而水源硝酸盐摄入量较高的参与者往往比摄入量低的同行更不健康。该队列未来的研究应考虑我们已确定的特定来源硝酸盐摄入量的社会人口统计学和饮食预测因素。