Miller Tony, Blackwood Christopher B, Case Andrea L
Department of Biological Sciences Kent State University Kent Ohio USA.
Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA.
Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 11;14(3):e10986. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10986. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Inclusion of edaphic conditions in biogeographical studies typically provides a better fit and deeper understanding of plant distributions. Increased reliance on soil data calls for easily accessible data layers providing continuous soil predictions worldwide. Although SoilGrids provides a potentially useful source of predicted soil data for biogeographic applications, its accuracy for estimating the soil characteristics experienced by individuals in small-scale populations is unclear. We used a biogeographic sampling approach to obtain soil samples from 212 sites across the midwestern and eastern United States, sampling only at sites where there was a population of one of the 22 species in sect. . We analyzed six physical and chemical characteristics in our samples and compared them with predicted values from SoilGrids. Across all sites and species, soil texture variables (clay, silt, sand) were better predicted by SoilGrids ( : .25-.46) than were soil chemistry variables (carbon and nitrogen, ≤ .01; pH, : .19). While SoilGrids predictions rarely matched actual field values for any variable, we were able to recover qualitative patterns relating species means and population-level plant characteristics to soil texture and pH. Rank order of species mean values from SoilGrids and direct measures were much more consistent for soil texture (Spearman = .74-.84; all < .0001) and pH ( = .61, = .002) than for carbon and nitrogen ( > .35). Within the species , a significant association, known from field measurements, between soil texture and population sex ratios could be detected using SoilGrids data, but only with large numbers of sites. Our results suggest that modeled soil texture values can be used with caution in biogeographic applications, such as species distribution modeling, but that soil carbon and nitrogen contents are currently unreliable, at least in the region studied here.
在生物地理学研究中纳入土壤条件通常能更好地拟合植物分布并加深对其理解。对土壤数据的依赖增加,需要易于获取的全球连续土壤预测数据层。尽管SoilGrids为生物地理应用提供了潜在有用的预测土壤数据源,但其在估计小规模种群中个体所经历的土壤特征方面的准确性尚不清楚。我们采用生物地理采样方法,从美国中西部和东部的212个地点采集土壤样本,仅在有sect.中22个物种之一的种群的地点进行采样。我们分析了样本中的六种物理和化学特征,并将其与SoilGrids的预测值进行比较。在所有地点和物种中,SoilGrids对土壤质地变量(粘土、粉砂、砂)的预测(R²:0.25 - 0.46)优于土壤化学变量(碳和氮,R²≤0.01;pH,R²:0.19)。虽然SoilGrids对任何变量的预测很少与实际田间值匹配,但我们能够恢复将物种均值和种群水平植物特征与土壤质地和pH相关的定性模式。SoilGrids的物种均值与直接测量值的排名顺序在土壤质地(斯皮尔曼相关系数 = 0.74 - 0.84;所有P < 0.0001)和pH(斯皮尔曼相关系数 = 0.61,P = 0.002)方面比碳和氮(P > 0.35)更一致。在物种中,利用SoilGrids数据可以检测到土壤质地与种群性别比之间从田间测量已知的显著关联,但仅在大量地点的情况下。我们的结果表明,建模的土壤质地值在生物地理应用(如物种分布建模)中可谨慎使用,但土壤碳和氮含量目前不可靠,至少在此处研究的区域是这样。