Suppr超能文献

混合式和硬性咬合稳定夹板的效率:随机临床试验。

Efficiency of mixed and rigid occlusal stabilization splints: Randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná - PUCPR, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Orthodontics, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

Zenith Educação Continuada, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Oral Res. 2024 Mar 11;38:e017. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0017. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Occlusal stabilization splints are the most common treatment for controlling the deleterious effects of sleep bruxism. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a low-cost, mixed occlusal splint (MOS) compared to that of a rigid splint. A randomized clinical trial was performed on 43 adults of both sexes with possible sleep bruxism and satisfactory dental conditions. They were divided into rigid occlusal splint (ROS) (n = 23) and MOS (n = 20) groups. Masticatory muscle and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain intensity (visual analog scale), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), indentations in the oral mucosa, anxiety, and depression (HADS), number of days of splint use, and splint wear were evaluated. All variables were evaluated at baseline (T0), 6 months (T6), and 12 months (T12) after splint installation (T0), and splint wear was evaluated at T6 and T12. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, non-parametric Friedman's analysis of variance for paired samples and pairwise multiple comparisons, Pearson's chi-square test, two-proportion z-test, non-parametric McNemar's and Cochran's Q, and Wilcoxon tests were used (p < 0.05). In both groups, there was a decrease in TMJ pain and pain intensity over time and improvements in the quality of life scores. At T6, there was a higher rate of splint wear in the MOS group than in the ROS group (p = 0.023). The MOS showed a higher rate of wear than the rigid splint but had similar results for the other variables. Therefore, the use of a mixed splint appears to be effective in controlling the signs and symptoms of sleep bruxism.

摘要

咬合稳定夹板是控制睡眠磨牙症有害影响的最常见治疗方法。本研究旨在评估一种低成本混合咬合夹板(MOS)与刚性夹板相比的有效性。对 43 名可能患有睡眠磨牙症且牙齿状况满意的男女成年人进行了一项随机临床试验。他们分为刚性咬合夹板(ROS)(n = 23)和 MOS 组(n = 20)。评估咀嚼肌和颞下颌关节(TMJ)疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)、生活质量(WHOQOL-BREF)、口腔黏膜压痕、焦虑和抑郁(HADS)、夹板使用天数和夹板佩戴情况。所有变量均在基线(T0)、安装夹板后 6 个月(T6)和 12 个月(T12)进行评估,在 T6 和 T12 时评估夹板佩戴情况。使用 Student's t 检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验、非参数 Friedman 配对样本方差分析和成对多重比较、Pearson 卡方检验、两比例 z 检验、非参数 McNemar 和 Cochran Q 检验和 Wilcoxon 检验(p < 0.05)。在两组中,TMJ 疼痛和疼痛强度随时间的推移而降低,生活质量评分提高。在 T6 时,MOS 组的夹板佩戴率高于 ROS 组(p = 0.023)。MOS 显示出比刚性夹板更高的磨损率,但其他变量的结果相似。因此,使用混合夹板似乎可以有效控制睡眠磨牙症的体征和症状。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d919/11376624/545b8ec33d8d/1807-3107-bor-38-e017-gf01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验