• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转移性癌症患者疼痛的阿片类药物治疗的益处、危害及利益相关者观点:一项描述性队列研究方案

Benefits, Harms, and Stakeholder Perspectives Regarding Opioid Therapy for Pain in Individuals With Metastatic Cancer: Protocol for a Descriptive Cohort Study.

作者信息

Jones Katie Fitzgerald, White Gretchen, Bennett Antonia, Bulls Hailey, Escott Paula, Orris Sarah, Escott Elizabeth, Fischer Stacy, Hamm Megan, Krishnamurti Tamar, Wong Risa, LeBlanc Thomas W, Liebschutz Jane, Meghani Salimah, Smith Cardinale, Temel Jennifer, Ritchie Christine, Merlin Jessica S

机构信息

New England Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Jamaica Plain, MA, United States.

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 13;13:e54953. doi: 10.2196/54953.

DOI:10.2196/54953
PMID:38478905
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10973954/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioids are a key component of pain management among patients with metastatic cancer pain. However, the evidence base available to guide opioid-related decision-making in individuals with advanced cancer is limited. Patients with advanced cancer or cancer that is unlikely to be cured frequently experience pain. Opioids are a key component of pain management among patients with metastatic cancer pain. Many individuals with advanced cancer are now living long enough to experience opioid-related harm. Emerging evidence from chronic noncancer pain literature suggests that longer-term opioid therapy may have limited benefits for pain and function, and opioid-related harms are also a major concern. However, whether these benefits and harms of opioids apply to patients with cancer-related pain is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This manuscript outlines the protocol for the "Opioid Therapy for Pain in Individuals With Metastatic Cancer: The Benefits, Harms, and Stakeholder Perspectives (BEST) Study." The study aims to better understand opioid decision-making in patients with advanced cancer, along with opioid benefits and harms, through prospective examination of patients' pain experiences and opioid side effects and understanding the decision-making by patients, care partners, and clinicians.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study that aims to enroll 630 patients with advanced cancer, 20 care partners, and 20 clinicians (670 total participants). Patient participants must have an advanced solid cancer diagnosis, defined by the American Cancer Society as cancer that is unlikely to be cured. We will recruit patient participants within 12 weeks after diagnosis so that we can understand opioid benefits, harms, and perspectives on opioid decision-making throughout the course of their advanced cancer (up to 2 years). We will also specifically elicit information regarding long-term opioid use (ie, opioids for ≥90 consecutive days) and exclude patients on long-term opioid therapy before an advanced cancer diagnosis. Lived-experience perspectives related to opioid use in those with advanced cancer will be captured by qualitative interviews with a subset of patients, clinicians, and care partners. Our data collection will be grounded in a behavioral decision research approach that will allow us to develop future interventions to inform opioid-related decision-making for patients with metastatic cancer.

RESULTS

Data collection began in October 2022 and is anticipated to end by November 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

Upon successful execution of our study protocol, we anticipate the development of a comprehensive evidence base on opioid therapy in individuals with advanced cancer guided by the behavioral decision research framework. The information gained from this study will be used to guide interventions to facilitate opioid decisions among patients, clinicians, and care partners. Given the limited evidence base about opioid therapy in people with cancer, we envision this study will have significant real-world implications for cancer-related pain management and opioid-related clinical decision-making.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/54953.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物是转移性癌痛患者疼痛管理的关键组成部分。然而,可用于指导晚期癌症患者阿片类药物相关决策的证据基础有限。晚期癌症患者或不太可能治愈的癌症患者经常会经历疼痛。阿片类药物是转移性癌痛患者疼痛管理的关键组成部分。许多晚期癌症患者现在存活时间足够长,会经历与阿片类药物相关的伤害。来自慢性非癌性疼痛文献的新证据表明,长期阿片类药物治疗对疼痛和功能的益处可能有限,且与阿片类药物相关的伤害也是一个主要问题。然而,这些阿片类药物的益处和危害是否适用于癌症相关疼痛患者尚不清楚。

目的

本手稿概述了“转移性癌症患者疼痛的阿片类药物治疗:益处、危害及利益相关者观点(BEST)研究”的方案。该研究旨在通过前瞻性检查患者的疼痛经历和阿片类药物副作用,并了解患者、护理伙伴和临床医生的决策过程,更好地理解晚期癌症患者的阿片类药物决策以及阿片类药物的益处和危害。

方法

这是一项多中心前瞻性队列研究,旨在招募630例晚期癌症患者、20名护理伙伴和20名临床医生(共670名参与者)。患者参与者必须有晚期实体癌诊断,美国癌症协会将其定义为不太可能治愈的癌症。我们将在诊断后12周内招募患者参与者,以便我们能够了解他们在整个晚期癌症病程(长达2年)中阿片类药物的益处、危害以及对阿片类药物决策的看法。我们还将特别收集有关长期使用阿片类药物(即连续使用阿片类药物≥90天)的信息,并排除在晚期癌症诊断前接受长期阿片类药物治疗的患者。通过对部分患者、临床医生和护理伙伴进行定性访谈,获取与晚期癌症患者阿片类药物使用相关的生活经历观点。我们的数据收集将基于行为决策研究方法,这将使我们能够开发未来的干预措施,为转移性癌症患者的阿片类药物相关决策提供信息。

结果

数据收集于2022年10月开始,预计2024年11月结束。

结论

在成功执行我们的研究方案后,我们预计将在行为决策研究框架的指导下,为晚期癌症患者开发一个关于阿片类药物治疗的综合证据基础。从这项研究中获得的信息将用于指导干预措施,以促进患者、临床医生和护理伙伴之间的阿片类药物决策。鉴于关于癌症患者阿片类药物治疗的证据基础有限,我们设想这项研究将对癌症相关疼痛管理和阿片类药物相关临床决策产生重大的现实意义。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/54953

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ae/10973954/f517d078bcd2/resprot_v13i1e54953_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ae/10973954/f517d078bcd2/resprot_v13i1e54953_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ae/10973954/f517d078bcd2/resprot_v13i1e54953_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Benefits, Harms, and Stakeholder Perspectives Regarding Opioid Therapy for Pain in Individuals With Metastatic Cancer: Protocol for a Descriptive Cohort Study.转移性癌症患者疼痛的阿片类药物治疗的益处、危害及利益相关者观点:一项描述性队列研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 13;13:e54953. doi: 10.2196/54953.
2
3
Patient and Provider Perspectives on Benefits and Harms of Continuing, Tapering, and Discontinuing Long-Term Opioid Therapy.患者和提供者对长期阿片类药物治疗持续、逐渐减少和停止的获益和危害的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1802-1811. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07880-z. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Responsible, Safe, and Effective Prescription of Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines.慢性非癌性疼痛阿片类药物的合理、安全与有效处方:美国介入性疼痛医师协会(ASIPP)指南
Pain Physician. 2017 Feb;20(2S):S3-S92.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate scaling interoperable clinical decision support for patient-centered chronic pain management in primary care.一项 III 型混合有效性-实施试验的研究方案,旨在评估可扩展的互操作临床决策支持在初级保健中以患者为中心的慢性疼痛管理中的应用。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jul 15;17(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01217-4.
7
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).阿片类药物与老年人慢性重度疼痛的管理:一个国际专家小组的共识声明,重点关注世界卫生组织第三阶梯临床最常用的六种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮)。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
8
Clinical Practice Guideline: Opioid Prescribing for Analgesia After Common Otolaryngology Operations.临床实践指南:常见耳鼻喉科手术后镇痛的阿片类药物处方。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Apr;164(2_suppl):S1-S42. doi: 10.1177/0194599821996297.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Clinical Practice Guideline: Opioid Prescribing for Analgesia After Common Otolaryngology Operations Executive Summary.临床实践指南:常见耳鼻喉科手术后镇痛的阿片类药物处方 执行摘要。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Apr;164(4):687-703. doi: 10.1177/0194599821996303.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term opioid therapy trajectories and overdose in patients with and without cancer.患癌与未患癌患者的长期阿片类药物治疗轨迹及过量用药情况
BMJ Oncol. 2023;2(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2022-000023. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
2
Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.《2022年癌症患者疼痛患病率最新情况:系统文献综述与荟萃分析》
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;15(3):591. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030591.
3
Use of Opioids for Adults With Pain From Cancer or Cancer Treatment: ASCO Guideline.
阿片类药物在患有癌症疼痛或癌症治疗疼痛的成人中的应用:美国临床肿瘤学会指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;41(4):914-930. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02198. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
4
Prescribing Opioids for Pain - The New CDC Clinical Practice Guideline.疼痛治疗中阿片类药物的处方——美国疾病控制与预防中心新临床实践指南
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 1;387(22):2011-2013. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2211040. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Prognostic communication about lung cancer in the precision oncology era: A multiple-perspective qualitative study.精准肿瘤学时代肺癌预后沟通:多视角定性研究。
Cancer. 2022 Aug 15;128(16):3120-3128. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34369. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Cancer as a new chronic disease: Oncology nursing in the 21st Century.癌症作为一种新型慢性病:21世纪的肿瘤护理。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2022 Feb 1;32(1):87-92. eCollection 2022 Winter.
7
Pharmacologic Management of Persistent Pain in Cancer Survivors.癌症幸存者持续性疼痛的药物治疗管理。
Drugs. 2022 Feb;82(3):275-291. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01675-6. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
8
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
9
Pain Prevalence During Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.癌症治疗期间的疼痛患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Mar;63(3):e317-e335. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.09.011. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
10
Chronic pain severity, impact, and opioid use among patients with cancer: An analysis of biopsychosocial factors using the CHOIR learning health care system.癌症患者的慢性疼痛严重程度、影响和阿片类药物使用:利用 CHOIR 学习医疗保健系统分析心理社会因素。
Cancer. 2021 Sep 1;127(17):3254-3263. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33645. Epub 2021 Jun 1.