Department of Aerospace Medicine, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Physiol Meas. 2024 Apr 16;45(4). doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ad33a1.
. This study aims to explore the possibility of using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to assess pursed lips breathing (PLB) performance of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. 32 patients with COPD were assigned equally to either the conventional group or the EIT guided group. All patients were taught to perform PLB by a physiotherapist without EIT in the conventional group or with EIT in the EIT guided group for 10 min. The ventilation of all patients in the final test were continuously monitored using EIT and the PLB performances were rated by another physiotherapist before and after reviewing EIT. The global and regional ventilation between two groups as well as between quite breathing (QB) and PLB were compared and rating scores with and without EIT were also compared.For global ventilation, the inspiratory depth and the ratio of expiratory-to-inspiratory time during PLB was significantly larger than those during QB for both group (< 0.001). The inspiratory depth and the ratio of expiratory-to-inspiratory time during PLB in the EIT guided group were higher compared to those in the conventional group (< 0.001), as well as expiratory flow expiratory uniformity and respiratory stability were better (< 0.001). For regional ventilation, center of ventilation significantly decreased during PLB (< 0.05). The expiratory time constant during PLB in the EIT guided group was greater than that in the conventional group (< 0.001). Additionally, Bland-Altman plots analysis suggested a high concordance between subjective rating and rating with the help of EIT, but the score rated after EIT observation significantly lower than that rated subjectively in both groups (score drop of -2.68 ± 1.1 in the conventional group and -1.19 ± 0.72 in the EIT guided group,< 0.01).EIT could capture the details of PLB maneuver, which might be a potential tool to quantitatively evaluate PLB performance and thus assist physiotherapists to teach PLB maneuver to patients.
本研究旨在探索使用电阻抗断层成像(EIT)评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的唇紧压呼吸(PLB)表现的可能性。将 32 名 COPD 患者平均分为常规组和 EIT 引导组。常规组的所有患者在没有 EIT 的情况下由物理治疗师教授 PLB,而 EIT 引导组的所有患者在 EIT 引导下进行 10 分钟的 PLB。在最后一次测试中,使用 EIT 连续监测所有患者的通气情况,然后由另一位物理治疗师在查看 EIT 前后对 PLB 表现进行评分。比较两组之间以及安静呼吸(QB)和 PLB 之间的整体和区域通气,比较有无 EIT 的评分。对于整体通气,两组患者在 PLB 期间的吸气深度和呼气与吸气时间的比值均明显大于 QB 期间(均<0.001)。EIT 引导组的 PLB 期间的吸气深度和呼气与吸气时间的比值高于常规组(均<0.001),呼气流量均匀度和呼吸稳定性也更好(均<0.001)。对于区域通气,在 PLB 期间中心通气明显降低(<0.05)。EIT 引导组的 PLB 期间的呼气时间常数大于常规组(<0.001)。此外,Bland-Altman 图分析表明,主观评分与 EIT 辅助评分之间具有高度一致性,但两组评分在 EIT 观察后均明显低于主观评分(常规组的评分下降为-2.68±1.1,EIT 引导组为-1.19±0.72,均<0.01)。EIT 可以捕捉 PLB 动作的细节,这可能是一种定量评估 PLB 表现的潜在工具,从而帮助物理治疗师教授 PLB 动作。