Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Research, Sector 12, pin-160012, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Research, Sector 12, pin-160012, Chandigarh, India.
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2024 Apr;60:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
The traditional reference standard, venous blood glucose requires venipuncture and laboratories usually return the test results after 60 min. Our aim was to determine the agreement accuracy of glucose (capillary) levels obtained by POC glucometers with glucose (venous) values by standard laboratory method (glucose-oxidase) and to assess whether and to what extent the glucometers perform uniformly well across the entire range of blood glucose values.
We compared the diagnostic accuracy of two-point of care glucometers with laboratory venous glucose, the reference standard using Bland-Altman plots and Clark error grid method to analyse the results.
This study included a total of 110 patients (38[34 %] women; mean age 52.1 years (SD, 17.3); range 14-85 years. Fourteen patients (12 %) were known to have diabetes. The mean glucose value (glucometer 1) was 152.9 mg/dL (SD 83.1); range = 48-501 mg/dL; that by glucometer 2 was 152.2 mg/dL (SD 76.2); range = 30-458 mg/dL and by the laboratory was 148.6 mg/dL (SD 81.5); range = 52-480 mg/dL. Of the 110 subjects, 2(2 %) had blood glucose below 70 mg/dL; 85(77 %) between 70 and 180 mg/dL and 23(21 %) had blood glucose exceeding 180 mg/dL. The Bland-Altman plot showed a bias of 4 mg% (95%CI -9.8 to +1.1); and the limits of agreement were -63 and + 54 mg%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the two glucometers was 0.92 and 0.93 respectively.
Point of care glucose, measured by glucometers was in agreement with the venous glucose estimation. Both glucometers were equally accurate and performed uniformly well across the wide range of blood glucose values.
传统的参考标准是静脉血糖,需要静脉穿刺,实验室通常在 60 分钟后返回检测结果。我们的目的是确定通过即时血糖仪(POC)获得的血糖(毛细血管)水平与实验室葡萄糖氧化酶法检测的血糖(静脉)值的一致性准确性,并评估血糖仪在整个血糖范围内是否以及在多大程度上能够均匀准确地进行测量。
我们使用 Bland-Altman 图和 Clark 误差网格法比较了两种即时血糖仪和实验室静脉血糖的诊断准确性,以评估结果。
这项研究共纳入 110 例患者(38 例[34%]为女性;平均年龄 52.1 岁[标准差 17.3];年龄范围 14-85 岁。14 例(12%)患者已知患有糖尿病。血糖仪 1 的平均血糖值为 152.9mg/dL(标准差 83.1);范围=48-501mg/dL;血糖仪 2 的平均血糖值为 152.2mg/dL(标准差 76.2);范围=30-458mg/dL;实验室的平均血糖值为 148.6mg/dL(标准差 81.5);范围=52-480mg/dL。在 110 例患者中,有 2 例(2%)血糖低于 70mg/dL;85 例(77%)血糖在 70-180mg/dL 之间;23 例(21%)血糖高于 180mg/dL。Bland-Altman 图显示偏倚为 4mg%(95%置信区间-9.8 至+1.1);一致性界限为-63 和+54mg%。两种血糖仪的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.92 和 0.93。
即时血糖仪测量的血糖与静脉血糖估计值相符。两种血糖仪的准确性相当,在广泛的血糖范围内表现均匀一致。