• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较行非网片原发性单侧腹股沟疝修补术的男性和女性:评估术前和急性术后疼痛的性别差异。

Matching males and females undergoing non mesh primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: evaluating sex differences in preoperative and acute postoperative pain.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Shouldice Hospital, 7750 Bayview Avenue, Thornhill, ON, L3T 7N2, Canada.

UZIK Consulting Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):1983-1990. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01792-9. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-01792-9
PMID:38480641
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective was to compare pain and related psychological factors during the preoperative and acute postoperative period between male and female patients, who underwent non mesh primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

After ethics approval, informed consent was obtained, and data were collected. Male and female participants were compared by manually matching one-to-one on 10 variables. Descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation and frequency) as well as numerical rating scales from 0 to 10 were used. Comparison tests were performed using Chi-square or Fisher's Exact test for categorical data and independent samples t-test or non-parametric equivalent tests for numerical scores. p < 0.05 is reported as statistically significant. To control type I error, Bonferroni correction was used.

RESULTS

72 participants with 36 matched pairs were included. Sex differences were found for operation length (p = .006), side of operation (p = .002), and hernia type (p = .013). Significant differences between the sexes were not found at the preoperative or postoperative time for resilience, pain interference or pain severity related measures, postoperative hernia pain incidence, pain catastrophizing, depression and anxiety symptoms, or return to normal activities.

CONCLUSION

When controlling for known confounders and using a conservative Type I error rate, pain and related factors between the sexes did not differ significantly.

摘要

目的

比较行单侧腹股沟无补片原发性疝修补术的男性和女性患者在术前和急性术后期间的疼痛和相关心理因素。

方法

获得伦理批准后,获得了知情同意,并收集了数据。通过手动将 10 个变量一一匹配,对男性和女性参与者进行了比较。使用 0 到 10 的数字评分量表以及描述性统计数据(均值±标准差和频率)来比较。对于分类数据,使用卡方或 Fisher 精确检验进行比较检验,对于数字评分,使用独立样本 t 检验或非参数等效检验。报告 p < 0.05 为统计学显著。为了控制 I 型错误,使用了 Bonferroni 校正。

结果

纳入了 72 名参与者,其中有 36 对匹配。在手术长度(p = 0.006)、手术侧(p = 0.002)和疝类型(p = 0.013)方面发现了性别差异。在术前或术后的恢复力、疼痛干扰或与疼痛严重程度相关的测量、术后疝痛发生率、疼痛灾难化、抑郁和焦虑症状或恢复正常活动方面,性别之间没有显著差异。

结论

在控制已知混杂因素并使用保守的 I 型错误率的情况下,性别之间的疼痛和相关因素没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Matching males and females undergoing non mesh primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: evaluating sex differences in preoperative and acute postoperative pain.比较行非网片原发性单侧腹股沟疝修补术的男性和女性:评估术前和急性术后疼痛的性别差异。
Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):1983-1990. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01792-9. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Randomised clinical trial: conventional Lichtenstein vs. hernioplasty with self-adhesive mesh in bilateral inguinal hernia surgery.随机临床试验:双侧腹股沟疝手术中传统利chtenstein修补术与自粘补片疝修补术的对比
Hernia. 2015 Oct;19(5):765-70. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1316-7. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
3
Three-month results of the effect of Ultrapro or Prolene mesh on post-operative pain and well-being following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TULP trial).内镜全腹膜外疝修补术后使用Ultrapro或普理灵补片对术后疼痛及舒适度影响的三个月结果(TULP试验)
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3171-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4049-x. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
4
The effect of ultrapro or prolene mesh on postoperative pain and well-being following endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair (TULP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Ultrapro 或 prolene 网片对内镜完全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术(TULP)后术后疼痛和舒适度的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Jun 7;13:76. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-76.
5
Factors predicting chronic pain after open mesh based inguinal hernia repair: ​A prospective cohort study.预测开放式网片腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 May;29:165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.061. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
6
Comparing suture with N-Hexyl Cyanoacrylate glue for mesh fixation in inguinal hernia repair, a randomised clinical trial.比较缝合与 N-己基氰基丙烯酸酯胶在腹股沟疝修补术中固定网片的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Surg. 2021 Jul;222(1):203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.029. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
7
Long-term follow-up after mesh removal and selective neurectomy for persistent inguinal postherniorrhaphy pain.网片取出和选择性神经切断术后持续性腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛的长期随访。
Hernia. 2013 Jun;17(3):339-45. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1073-z. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
8
Self-adhesive mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Experience of a single center.用于李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的自粘补片。单中心经验。
Minerva Chir. 2014 Jun;69(3):167-76. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
9
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
10
Fibrin glue versus staple mesh fixation in single-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A propensity score-matched analysis.纤维蛋白胶与钉板网片固定在单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.029. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Matching males and females undergoing Shouldice repair using a prospective, longitudinal design.采用前瞻性纵向设计对接受肖尔代斯修补术的男性和女性进行匹配。
Can J Surg. 2025 Aug 8;68(4):E325-E332. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012824. Print 2025 Jul-Aug.