Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Office of Medical Student Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Anat Sci Educ. 2024 Jun;17(4):878-882. doi: 10.1002/ase.2403. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
Three-dimensional (3D) modeling is a recent, innovative approach to teaching anatomy. There is little literature, however, to suggest how 3D modeling is best used to teach students and whether or not students can gain the same level of understanding as they might use more traditional, hands-on, teaching methods. This study evaluated the use of a 3D modeling software in both a flipped classroom curriculum and as an active learning tool in comparison to traditional, physical model-based teaching. Pre- and post-course content-based assessments were used to evaluate students' learning. Our findings indicated no significant difference between standard and flipped classroom learning; however, the students who used 3D modeling software as an active learning tool significantly underperformed students in the standard group (F(2,1060) = 112.43, p < 0.0001). These findings suggest that these technologies may not yet be useful as a primary means of instruction. Possible explanations may include cognitive overload in navigating the system, intrinsic limitations of the software, or other factors. Further development and research of these technologies is necessary prior to their adoption into teaching practices in anatomy.
三维(3D)建模是一种教授解剖学的新兴创新方法。然而,几乎没有文献表明 3D 建模如何最好地用于教授学生,以及学生是否可以获得与使用更传统的、基于实践的教学方法相同的理解水平。本研究评估了在翻转课堂课程中以及作为主动学习工具使用 3D 建模软件与传统的基于物理模型的教学相比的效果。课程前后的基于内容的评估用于评估学生的学习情况。我们的研究结果表明,标准和翻转课堂学习之间没有显著差异;然而,将 3D 建模软件用作主动学习工具的学生的表现明显逊于标准组的学生(F(2,1060) = 112.43,p < 0.0001)。这些结果表明,这些技术可能还不能作为主要的教学手段。可能的解释包括在系统中导航时的认知过载、软件的固有局限性或其他因素。在将这些技术应用于解剖学教学实践之前,需要进一步开发和研究这些技术。