Moser Newell, Benzing Jake, Kafka Orion L, Weaver Jordan, Derimow Nicholas, Rentz Ross, Hrabe Nikolas
Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway St, Boulder, 80305, CO, USA.
Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, 20899, MD, USA.
Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2024 Jan 16;2024. doi: 10.1007/s40192-023-00333-3.
The additive manufacturing benchmarking challenge described in this work was aimed at the prediction of average stress-strain properties for tensile specimens that were excised from blocks of non-heat-treated IN625 manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Two different laser scan strategies were considered: an X-only raster and an XY raster, which involved a 90° rotation in the scan direction between subsequent layers. To measure anisotropy, multiple tensile orientations with respect to the build direction were investigated (e.g., parallel, perpendicular, and intervals in between). Benchmark participants were provided grain structure information via electron backscatter diffraction measurements, as well as the stress-strain response for tensile specimens manufactured parallel to the build direction and produced by the XY scan strategy. Then, participants were asked to predict tensile properties, like the ultimate tensile strength, for the remaining specimens and orientations. Interestingly, the measured mechanical properties did not vary linearly as a function of tensile orientation. Moreover, specimens manufactured with the XY scan strategy exhibited greater yield strength than those corresponding to the X-only scan strategy, regardless of orientation. The benchmark data has been made publicly available for anyone that is interested [1]. For the modeling aspect of the challenge, five teams participated in this benchmark. While most of the models incorporated a crystal plasticity framework, one team chose to use a more semi-empirical approach, and to great success. However, no team excelled at all the predictions, and all teams were seemingly challenged with the predictions associated with the X-only scan strategy.
本工作中描述的增材制造基准测试挑战旨在预测从通过激光粉末床熔融制造的未热处理IN625块体中切取的拉伸试样的平均应力-应变特性。考虑了两种不同的激光扫描策略:仅X方向的光栅扫描和XY光栅扫描,后者在后续层之间的扫描方向上涉及90°旋转。为了测量各向异性,研究了相对于构建方向的多个拉伸取向(例如,平行、垂直以及两者之间的间隔)。通过电子背散射衍射测量为基准测试参与者提供了晶粒结构信息,以及平行于构建方向且采用XY扫描策略制造的拉伸试样的应力-应变响应。然后,要求参与者预测其余试样和取向的拉伸性能,如极限抗拉强度。有趣的是,测量的力学性能并非随拉伸取向呈线性变化。此外,无论取向如何,采用XY扫描策略制造的试样均比仅采用X扫描策略制造的试样具有更高的屈服强度。基准测试数据已向任何感兴趣的人公开提供[1]。对于该挑战的建模方面,有五个团队参与了此次基准测试。虽然大多数模型采用了晶体塑性框架,但有一个团队选择使用更半经验的方法,并取得了巨大成功。然而,没有一个团队在所有预测方面都表现出色,并且所有团队在与仅X扫描策略相关的预测方面似乎都面临挑战。