Burkhard Lawrence P, Votava Lauren K
Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Blvd, Duluth, MN 55804 USA.
Oak Ridge Associated Universities Student Services Contractor to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Blvd, Duluth, MN 55804 USA.
Environ Adv. 2022 Dec 26;11:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100335.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely used across the globe in commercial products such textiles, firefighting foams, and surface coatings. Some PFAS, such as perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), are known to be bioaccumulative. Numerous terrestrial ecosystems including sites near PFAS manufacturing facilities, facilities using PFAS in their manufacturing processes, firefighting training areas, landfills, and agricultural fields treated with some pesticide formulations, have been contaminated with PFAS. Earthworms reside at the base of the terrestrial food chain and to perform risk assessments at terrestrial sites contaminated with PFAS, information on the bioaccumulation of PFAS is needed. To understand the bioaccumulation of PFAS by earthworms, a literature search was performed, and biota-soil accumulation factors (BSAFs), measured in laboratory tests and at field sites contaminated with PFAS, were assembled and evaluated in this review. Based on this review, we conclude that there is enough data available for carboxylic and sulfonic acid PFAS classes to derive useful BSAFs for terrestrial risk assessments. Laboratory tests with PFOS and PFOA will be close to or at steady-state conditions with standardized testing protocols, and for the longer chain carboxylic and sulfonic acids, it is unlikely they will reach steady-state with the completion of the uptake exposure. For PFAS classes beyond the carboxylic and sulfonic acids, data are limited and performing terrestrial risk assessments with these PFAS will be difficult. Lastly, additional measurements are needed for non-acid PFAS classes as well as from field settings for all PFAS classes. Across all studies, PFOS and PFOA had average (standard deviation, count) BSAFs (kg-OC/kg-ww) of 0.167 (0.311, 60) and 0.0413 (0.175, 47), respectively.
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)在全球范围内广泛用于商业产品,如纺织品、消防泡沫和表面涂层。已知一些PFAS,如全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)和全氟辛酸(PFOA)具有生物累积性。许多陆地生态系统,包括PFAS制造设施附近的场地、在制造过程中使用PFAS的设施、消防训练区、垃圾填埋场以及使用某些农药配方处理过的农田,都已被PFAS污染。蚯蚓处于陆地食物链的底层,为了对受PFAS污染的陆地场地进行风险评估,需要有关PFAS生物累积的信息。为了了解蚯蚓对PFAS的生物累积情况,我们进行了文献检索,并在本综述中汇总和评估了在实验室测试以及受PFAS污染的现场所测量的生物群-土壤累积因子(BSAF)。基于本综述,我们得出结论,羧酸类和磺酸类PFAS有足够的数据来得出用于陆地风险评估的有用BSAF。使用标准化测试方案对PFOS和PFOA进行的实验室测试将接近或处于稳态条件,而对于较长链的羧酸和磺酸,在吸收暴露完成时它们不太可能达到稳态。对于羧酸和磺酸以外的PFAS类别,数据有限,使用这些PFAS进行陆地风险评估将很困难。最后,对于非酸性PFAS类别以及所有PFAS类别的现场环境,都需要进行额外的测量。在所有研究中,PFOS和PFOA的平均(标准差,数量)BSAF(kg-OC/kg-ww)分别为0.167(0.311,60)和0.0413(0.175,47)。