Yang Yuhan, Battaglia Michael A, Robinson Ellis S, DeCarlo Peter F, Edwards Kasey C, Fang Ting, Kapur Sukriti, Shiraiwa Manabu, Cesler-Maloney Meeta, Simpson William R, Campbell James R, Nenes Athanasios, Mao Jingqiu, Weber Rodney J
School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Department of Environmental Health & Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States.
ACS EST Air. 2024 Feb 14;1(3):188-199. doi: 10.1021/acsestair.3c00067. eCollection 2024 Mar 8.
The indoor air quality of a residential home during winter in Fairbanks, Alaska, was investigated and contrasted with outdoor levels. Twenty-four-hour average indoor and outdoor filter samples were collected from January 17 to February 25, 2022, in a residential area with high outdoor PM concentrations. The oxidative potential of PM was determined using the dithiothreitol-depletion assay (OP). For the unoccupied house, the background indoor-to-outdoor (I/O) ratio of mass-normalized OP (OP), a measure of the intrinsic health-relevant properties of the aerosol, was less than 1 (0.53 ± 0.37), implying a loss of aerosol toxicity as air was transported indoors. This may result from transport and volatility losses driven by the large gradients in temperature (average outdoor temperature of -19°C/average indoor temperature of 21 °C) or relative humidity (average outdoor RH of 78%/average indoor RH of 11%), or both. Various indoor activities, including pellet stove use, simple cooking experiments, incense burning, and mixtures of these activities, were conducted. The experiments produced PM with a highly variable OP. PM from cooking emissions had the lowest OP values, while pellet stove PM had the highest. Correlations between volume-normalized OP (OP), relevant to exposure, and indoor PM mass concentration during experiments were much lower compared to those in outdoor environments. This suggests that mass concentration alone can be a poor indicator of possible adverse effects of various indoor emissions. These findings highlight the importance of considering both the quantity of particles and sources (chemical composition), as health metrics for indoor air quality.
对阿拉斯加费尔班克斯冬季住宅的室内空气质量进行了调查,并与室外水平进行了对比。2022年1月17日至2月25日,在室外PM浓度较高的居民区收集了24小时平均室内和室外过滤器样本。使用二硫苏糖醇消耗试验(OP)测定PM的氧化潜力。对于无人居住的房屋,质量归一化OP(OP)的背景室内与室外(I/O)比值小于1(0.53±0.37),OP是衡量气溶胶与健康相关内在特性的指标,这意味着随着空气输送到室内,气溶胶毒性降低。这可能是由温度(平均室外温度为-19°C/平均室内温度为21°C)或相对湿度(平均室外相对湿度为78%/平均室内相对湿度为11%)的大梯度或两者共同驱动的传输和挥发性损失导致的。进行了各种室内活动,包括使用颗粒炉、简单烹饪实验、焚香以及这些活动的混合。这些实验产生的PM的OP高度可变。烹饪排放产生的PM的OP值最低,而颗粒炉产生的PM的OP值最高。与室外环境相比,实验期间与暴露相关的体积归一化OP(OP)与室内PM质量浓度之间的相关性要低得多。这表明仅质量浓度可能是各种室内排放可能产生不利影响的一个较差指标。这些发现突出了将颗粒数量和来源(化学成分)都作为室内空气质量健康指标的重要性。