Suppr超能文献

通过互联网治疗完美主义:一项比较认知行为疗法和统一方案的随机对照试验。

Treating perfectionism via the Internet: a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive behavior therapy to unified protocol.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Cogn Behav Ther. 2024 May;53(3):324-350. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2024.2327339. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

Abstract

Perfectionism can be problematic when your self-worth is dependent on achievements and leads to inflexible standards, cognitive biases, and rigid behaviors. Cognitive behavior therapy for perfectionism is shown to be effective, including for targeting psychiatric symptoms and when delivered via the Internet (iCBT-P). However, few studies have compared it to an active comparator. The current study randomly assigned 138 participants seeking help for perfectionism to iCBT-P or Internet-based Unified Protocol (iUP). Both treatments provided guidance on demand from a therapist and were eight weeks in duration. The results indicated large within-group effects of Cohen's 2.03 (iCBT) and 2.51 (iUP) on the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire at post-treatment, and maintained effects at 6- and 12-month follow-up, but no between-group difference (β = 0.02, SE = 1.04,  = .98). Secondary outcomes of depression, anxiety, quality of life, self-compassion, procrastination, and stress ranged from small to large, with no differences between the conditions. Both treatments were deemed credible, relevant, of high quality, and well-adhered by the participants. Further research needs to be conducted, but the findings could indicate a lack of specificity, perhaps suggesting there is no need to differentiate between different treatments that are transdiagnostic in nature.

摘要

当你的自我价值取决于成就,并且导致了不灵活的标准、认知偏差和刻板行为时,完美主义可能会成为一个问题。认知行为疗法对完美主义是有效的,包括针对精神症状,以及通过互联网(iCBT-P)进行治疗。然而,很少有研究将其与积极的对照组进行比较。本研究随机分配了 138 名寻求完美主义治疗的参与者,分别接受 iCBT-P 或基于互联网的统一协议(iUP)治疗。两种治疗方法都提供了来自治疗师按需指导,持续八周。结果表明,在治疗后,临床完美主义问卷的个体内效应较大,Cohen 的 2.03(iCBT)和 2.51(iUP),并且在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访中保持了效果,但组间没有差异(β=0.02,SE=1.04,=.98)。抑郁、焦虑、生活质量、自我同情、拖延和压力的次要结果从小到大不等,两种条件之间没有差异。两种治疗方法都被认为是可信的、相关的、高质量的,并且被参与者很好地遵循。需要进一步的研究,但这些发现可能表明缺乏特异性,也许表明没有必要区分不同的治疗方法,这些方法在本质上是跨诊断的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验