Sweeney Christopher J, Bottoms Melanie, Schulz Lennart
Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.
BioChem agrar GmbH, Machern OT Gerichshain, Germany.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Sep;20(5):1611-1624. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4913. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 216 test guideline investigates the impact of agrochemicals on soil nitrogen transformation. After an evaluation of 465 OECD 216 studies, we describe two distinct yet contrasting outcomes in control nontreated samples that are possible in this testing framework, which we term the "rise" (consistent increases in nitrate concentrations throughout the test period) and "dip" (initial decline in nitrate concentration between Days 0-7, followed by a net-generation of nitrate across Days 7-28) responses. We raise significant concerns that control data from standardized, internationally recognized test guidelines can demonstrate such dissimilar patterns. We propose that, when present, the dip response undermines the intended functioning of the test system and removes the ability to draw appropriate ecotoxicological inferences from the data. In this work, we hypothesize the dip response is a product of conducting the study in low nitrogen content soils. Our results indicate that the dip response can be alleviated by using ammonium sulfate as an immediately available inorganic nitrogen source in place of the guideline-mandated complex, organic lucerne meal, demonstrating the influence of nitrogen availability and accessibility. However, not all low nitrogen soils exhibited the dip response, indicating the involvement of additional unidentified factors. Using our data and real-world regulatory examples, we advocate that datasets displaying the dip response should not be considered valid OECD 216 studies due to the influence of soil properties precluding an assessment of whether any impacts observed are driven solely by the test compound in question or are instead a product of the soil used. We propose methods to account for these soil-specific responses that could be integrated into the conduct and interpretation of OECD 216 studies. Such amendments will improve the reliability and robustness of the study system and enhance confidence in ecotoxicological conclusions derived from OECD 216 datasets. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1611-1624. © 2024 SETAC.
经济合作与发展组织(OECD)216号测试指南研究农用化学品对土壤氮转化的影响。在评估了465项OECD 216研究后,我们描述了在此测试框架中对照未处理样品可能出现的两种截然不同但又相互对比的结果,我们将其称为“上升”(在整个测试期间硝酸盐浓度持续增加)和“下降”(在第0 - 7天硝酸盐浓度最初下降,随后在第7 - 28天硝酸盐净生成)反应。我们对来自标准化、国际认可的测试指南的对照数据能显示出如此不同的模式提出了重大担忧。我们提出,当出现“下降”反应时,会破坏测试系统的预期功能,并使从数据中得出适当的生态毒理学推断的能力丧失。在这项工作中,我们假设“下降”反应是在低氮含量土壤中进行研究的产物。我们的结果表明,通过使用硫酸铵作为即时可用的无机氮源来替代指南规定的复杂有机苜蓿粉,可以缓解“下降”反应,这表明了氮的有效性和可利用性的影响。然而,并非所有低氮土壤都表现出“下降”反应,这表明还有其他未确定的因素参与其中。利用我们的数据和实际监管示例,我们主张,由于土壤性质的影响,排除了对所观察到的任何影响是否仅由所讨论的测试化合物驱动或相反是所用土壤的产物进行评估,显示“下降”反应的数据集不应被视为有效的OECD 216研究。我们提出了考虑这些土壤特定反应的方法,这些方法可纳入OECD 216研究的实施和解释中。此类修正将提高研究系统的可靠性和稳健性,并增强对从OECD 216数据集中得出的生态毒理学结论的信心。《综合环境评估与管理》2024年;20:1611 - 1624。© 2024 SETAC。