Suppr超能文献

与改良球囊相比,高速旋磨术降低了钙化冠状动脉病变的血运重建率:随机 PREPARE-CALC 试验的 5 年结果。

Lower revascularization rates after high-speed rotational atherectomy compared to modified balloons in calcified coronary lesions: 5-year outcomes of the randomized PREPARE-CALC trial.

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Heart Center, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Am Kurpark 1, 23795, Bad Segeberg, Germany.

Cardiology Department, Zagazig University, Sharkia, Egypt.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Jul;113(7):1051-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02434-1. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the PREPARE-CALC trial, severely calcified lesion preparation with rotational atherectomy (RA) before biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation demonstrated higher procedural success and comparable rates of acute lumen gain and late lumen loss compared to modified balloons (MB) (scoring/cutting). We aimed to analyze the 5-year outcomes of both lesion preparation strategies.

METHODS

PREPARE-CALC randomly assigned 200 patients 1:1 to MB or RA, followed by SES implantation. The principal endpoint of the current analysis was target vessel failure (TVF) at 5 years.

RESULTS

At 5 years, MB had comparable rates of TVF to RA (19% vs. 21%, HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.60-2.16, p = 0.687). Subgroup analysis showed a lesion length treatment interaction, favoring MB for short lesions and RA for long ones (p for interaction = 0.042). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was significantly less common with RA (12 vs. 3%, HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.98, p = 0.048). In a multivariate analysis, RA was independently protective against TLR (adj. HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.78, p = 0.022), while ostial lesions were associated with higher TLR independent of treatment strategy (adj. HR 11.3, 95% CI 2.98-42.6, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with severely calcified coronary lesions, using MB or RA for lesion preparation followed by biodegradable polymer SES implantation was associated with comparable rates of TVF at 5 years. However, a significant reduction of TLR was observed after RA. PREPARE-CALC is the first randomized trial showing potential clinical advantages of RA over MB during long-term follow-up.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov . Unique identifier: NCT02502851.

摘要

背景

在 PREPARE-CALC 试验中,与改良球囊(MB)(切割/切割)相比,在生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)植入前使用旋切术(RA)对严重钙化病变进行预处理,显示出更高的手术成功率和相似的急性管腔获得率和晚期管腔丢失率。我们旨在分析两种病变准备策略的 5 年结果。

方法

PREPARE-CALC 将 200 例患者随机分为 1:1 的 MB 或 RA 组,随后进行 SES 植入。本分析的主要终点是 5 年时的靶血管失败(TVF)。

结果

5 年时,MB 的 TVF 率与 RA 相当(19% vs. 21%,HR 1.14,95%CI 0.60-2.16,p=0.687)。亚组分析显示病变长度治疗存在交互作用,MB 有利于短病变,RA 有利于长病变(p 交互作用=0.042)。RA 组的靶病变血运重建(TLR)明显较少(12% vs. 3%,HR 0.28,95%CI 0.08-0.98,p=0.048)。在多变量分析中,RA 独立于治疗策略具有 TLR 的保护作用(adj. HR 0.17,95%CI 0.04-0.78,p=0.022),而开口病变与 TLR 独立相关,与治疗策略无关(adj. HR 11.3,95%CI 2.98-42.6,p<0.001)。

结论

在严重钙化的冠状动脉病变患者中,使用 MB 或 RA 进行病变准备,随后进行生物可降解聚合物 SES 植入,5 年时 TVF 发生率相当。然而,RA 后 TLR 显著减少。PREPARE-CALC 是第一个随机试验,显示 RA 在长期随访中优于 MB 的潜在临床优势。

临床试验注册

URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT02502851。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验