From the Cooper Medical School of Rowan University.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper University Healthcare, Camden, NJ.
Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Mar 1;30(3):233-238. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001456. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
This study reviewed instructional videos on YouTube regarding pelvic floor physical therapy and assessed the association between the videos' popularity and the reliability of the videos' content. YouTube was searched using the terms relevant to pelvic floor muscle training. The first 100 videos for each search term were screened, and relevant metrics were collected for those meeting the inclusion criteria. Videos were assessed by 2 independent, trained health care professionals for reliability using the Medical Quality Video Evaluation (MQ-VET) tool, the modified DISCERN tool, the Journal of American Medical Association benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score. Popularity was assessed using the Video Power Index (VPI). Higher values for all scoring systems correlated with greater reliability and greater popularity, respectively. Five hundred videos were screened. Two hundred thirty-four videos were duplicates, and 99 did not meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 167 videos were reviewed. The median VPI and MQ-VET score was 201,114.76 (interquartile range, 7,194,020.29) and 48.00 (interquartile range, 12.75), respectively. Spearman's R value was 0.292 (P < 0.001), demonstrating a weak positive correlation between MQ-VET scores and VPI. The interrater reliability of the MQ-VET was good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.92). In summary, we identified a statistically significant but weak positive correlation between the reliability and popularity of YouTube videos about pelvic floor physical therapy.
这项研究回顾了 YouTube 上关于盆底物理治疗的教学视频,并评估了视频的受欢迎程度与视频内容可靠性之间的关联。使用与盆底肌肉训练相关的术语在 YouTube 上进行搜索。筛选每个搜索词的前 100 个视频,并为符合纳入标准的视频收集相关指标。由 2 名独立的、经过培训的医疗保健专业人员使用医疗质量视频评估 (MQ-VET) 工具、修改后的 DISCERN 工具、《美国医学会杂志》基准标准和全球质量评分对视频的可靠性进行评估。使用视频影响力指数 (VPI) 评估受欢迎程度。所有评分系统的得分越高,分别与可靠性和受欢迎程度呈正相关。筛选了 500 个视频。234 个视频是重复的,99 个不符合纳入标准。共审查了 167 个视频。中位数 VPI 和 MQ-VET 评分为 201,114.76(四分位距,7,194,020.29)和 48.00(四分位距,12.75)。Spearman 的 R 值为 0.292(P < 0.001),表明 MQ-VET 评分与 VPI 之间存在弱正相关。MQ-VET 的组内相关系数良好,为 0.86(95%置信区间,0.71-0.92)。总之,我们发现 YouTube 上关于盆底物理治疗的视频的可靠性和受欢迎程度之间存在统计学上显著但较弱的正相关。