• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube 上的盆底治疗视频质量:热门程度是否预示可靠性?

Quality of Pelvic Floor Therapy Videos on YouTube: Does Popularity Predict Reliability?

机构信息

From the Cooper Medical School of Rowan University.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper University Healthcare, Camden, NJ.

出版信息

Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Mar 1;30(3):233-238. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001456. Epub 2024 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001456
PMID:38484236
Abstract

This study reviewed instructional videos on YouTube regarding pelvic floor physical therapy and assessed the association between the videos' popularity and the reliability of the videos' content. YouTube was searched using the terms relevant to pelvic floor muscle training. The first 100 videos for each search term were screened, and relevant metrics were collected for those meeting the inclusion criteria. Videos were assessed by 2 independent, trained health care professionals for reliability using the Medical Quality Video Evaluation (MQ-VET) tool, the modified DISCERN tool, the Journal of American Medical Association benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score. Popularity was assessed using the Video Power Index (VPI). Higher values for all scoring systems correlated with greater reliability and greater popularity, respectively. Five hundred videos were screened. Two hundred thirty-four videos were duplicates, and 99 did not meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 167 videos were reviewed. The median VPI and MQ-VET score was 201,114.76 (interquartile range, 7,194,020.29) and 48.00 (interquartile range, 12.75), respectively. Spearman's R value was 0.292 (P < 0.001), demonstrating a weak positive correlation between MQ-VET scores and VPI. The interrater reliability of the MQ-VET was good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.92). In summary, we identified a statistically significant but weak positive correlation between the reliability and popularity of YouTube videos about pelvic floor physical therapy.

摘要

这项研究回顾了 YouTube 上关于盆底物理治疗的教学视频,并评估了视频的受欢迎程度与视频内容可靠性之间的关联。使用与盆底肌肉训练相关的术语在 YouTube 上进行搜索。筛选每个搜索词的前 100 个视频,并为符合纳入标准的视频收集相关指标。由 2 名独立的、经过培训的医疗保健专业人员使用医疗质量视频评估 (MQ-VET) 工具、修改后的 DISCERN 工具、《美国医学会杂志》基准标准和全球质量评分对视频的可靠性进行评估。使用视频影响力指数 (VPI) 评估受欢迎程度。所有评分系统的得分越高,分别与可靠性和受欢迎程度呈正相关。筛选了 500 个视频。234 个视频是重复的,99 个不符合纳入标准。共审查了 167 个视频。中位数 VPI 和 MQ-VET 评分为 201,114.76(四分位距,7,194,020.29)和 48.00(四分位距,12.75)。Spearman 的 R 值为 0.292(P < 0.001),表明 MQ-VET 评分与 VPI 之间存在弱正相关。MQ-VET 的组内相关系数良好,为 0.86(95%置信区间,0.71-0.92)。总之,我们发现 YouTube 上关于盆底物理治疗的视频的可靠性和受欢迎程度之间存在统计学上显著但较弱的正相关。

相似文献

1
Quality of Pelvic Floor Therapy Videos on YouTube: Does Popularity Predict Reliability?YouTube 上的盆底治疗视频质量:热门程度是否预示可靠性?
Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Mar 1;30(3):233-238. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001456. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
2
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Optic Neuritis: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Validated Scoring Systems.评估YouTube上视神经炎相关视频的质量和可靠性:一项使用经过验证的评分系统的横断面研究。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14527.
3
Evaluating the quality of osteonecrosis and avascular necrosis content on youtube: a multidimensional analysis using DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS tools.评估YouTube上关于骨坏死和缺血性坏死内容的质量:使用DISCERN、《美国医学会杂志》和GQS工具进行的多维度分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 22;20(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06116-0.
4
Platelet-rich plasma videos for knee osteoarthritis on YouTube are of acceptable quality and content.YouTube上关于膝骨关节炎的富血小板血浆视频在质量和内容方面是可以接受的。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e43437. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043437.
5
Accuracy, Quality, and Misinformation of YouTube Abortion Procedural Videos: Cross-Sectional Study.YouTube 堕胎手术视频的准确性、质量和错误信息:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 22;26:e50099. doi: 10.2196/50099.
6
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Providing Nutritional Recommendations for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.评估YouTube上为肠易激综合征提供营养建议的视频的质量和可靠性。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Aug;38(4):e70088. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70088.
7
Evaluating the quality and reliability of youtube videos on Hirschsprung's disease: a comprehensive analysis for patients, parents and health professionals.评估YouTube上关于先天性巨结肠症视频的质量和可靠性:针对患者、家长及医疗专业人员的全面分析
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 17;41(1):173. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06064-0.
8
Aspergillosis on YouTube: Assessment of Quality and Reliability of Uploaded Videos.YouTube上的曲霉病:对上传视频质量和可靠性的评估。
Mycopathologia. 2025 Jun 23;190(4):57. doi: 10.1007/s11046-025-00967-1.
9
Content quality and reliability of YouTube videos on oral appliance therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic analysis.YouTube 视频中关于口腔矫治器治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的内容质量和可靠性:系统分析。
Spec Care Dentist. 2024 Sep;44(5):1307-1316. doi: 10.1111/scd.12995. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
10
YouTube as an information source for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of video content.YouTube作为股骨髋臼撞击症的信息来源:视频内容的系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Aug 20.