Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.
Diabetes Care. 2024 May 1;47(5):835-843. doi: 10.2337/dc23-2165.
Intensive glycemic control reduced coronary artery disease (CAD) events among the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study participants with the haptoglobin (Hp)2-2 phenotype but not in participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype. It is unknown whether and how these results translate across different demographic/clinical characteristics and treatment strategies.
Haptoglobin phenotype was measured in available samples from the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) biomarker case-cohort study. Weighted multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between intensive glycemic control (HbA1c target of ≤6.5%) versus standard therapy (based on local guidelines) and major CAD events among participants with (n = 1,327) and without (n = 2,077) the Hp2-2 phenotype separately and within prespecified stratifications by sex, race, previous cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes duration, and HDL-cholesterol.
While the hazard ratios (HRs) were in the hypothesized differing directions, compared with standard therapy, intensive glycemic control was not significantly associated with risk of CAD events among participants without (1.04, 95% CI 0.82-1.32) or with (0.84, 0.63-1.14, Pinteraction = 0.27) the Hp2-2 phenotype overall. Intensive therapy was associated with lower CAD risk among participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype who had no previous CVD (0.47, 0.29-0.76, Pinteraction = 0.01).
Our findings suggest that intensive glycemic control contributes to the prevention of major CAD events among ADVANCE participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype and no previous CVD and are in alignment with our hypothesis that intensive glycemic control may be beneficial in a subset of people with the Hp2-2 phenotype.
在 ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES(ACCORD)研究中,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)控制目标值<6.5%的强化血糖控制方案降低了具有 Hp 表型 2-2 的参与者的冠心病(CAD)事件发生率,但不降低不具有 Hp 表型 2-2 的参与者的 CAD 事件发生率。尚不清楚这些结果是否以及如何在不同的人口统计学/临床特征和治疗策略中转化。
在 ACTION IN DIABETES AND VASCULAR DISEASE:PRETERAX AND DIAMICRON MR CONTROLLED EVALUATION(ADVANCE)生物标志物病例-对照研究的可用样本中测量 Hp 表型。采用加权多变量调整 Cox 回归模型评估强化血糖控制(HbA1c 目标值<6.5%)与标准治疗(基于当地指南)之间与主要 CAD 事件之间的关系,该分析在分别具有(n=1327)和不具有(n=2077) Hp 表型 2-2 的参与者以及在性别、种族、既往心血管疾病(CVD)、糖尿病病程和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的预先指定分层内进行。
与标准治疗相比,尽管危险比(HRs)的方向与假设一致,但在不具有(1.04,95%CI 0.82-1.32)或具有(0.84,0.63-1.14,P 交互=0.27) Hp 表型 2-2 的参与者中,强化血糖控制与 CAD 事件风险无显著相关性。在没有既往 CVD 的具有 Hp 表型 2-2 的参与者中,强化治疗与较低的 CAD 风险相关(0.47,0.29-0.76,P 交互=0.01)。
我们的研究结果表明,强化血糖控制有助于 ADVANCE 研究中具有 Hp 表型 2-2 且无既往 CVD 的参与者预防主要 CAD 事件,并且与我们的假设一致,即强化血糖控制可能对具有 Hp 表型 2-2 的一部分人群有益。