Suppr超能文献

雇主为导向的针对残疾人士就业的干预措施:系统评价。

Employer-focused interventions targeting disability employment: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Sports Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Department of Management, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2024 Apr;347:116742. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116742. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

Abstract

There are a wide range of interventions that are designed to influence employer behaviour with respect to the employment of people with disabilities. This study presents the results of a systematic review looking at employer-focused interventions to improve disability employment, focusing on interventions or policies taking placing in high-income countries as per the OECD. This systematic review focuses on a broad range of potential employment-related outcomes, including the employment rate, time to return to work and length of sickness absence. The results of 71 papers that evaluate the effectiveness of a range of interventions were synthesised into a narrative review. Interventions are grouped into six broad categories: anti-discrimination legislation, quota systems, part-time sick leave, graded return to work and wage subsidy schemes. Anti-discrimination legislation is not effective at improving the employment prospects of people with disabilities. There is mixed evidence with respect to quota systems and wage subsidy schemes. However, the availability of part time sick leave or graded return to work are both consistently associated with improved work participation for people with disabilities.

摘要

有各种各样的干预措施旨在影响雇主在雇用残疾人方面的行为。本研究报告了一项系统评价的结果,该评价着眼于以雇主为重点的干预措施,以改善残疾人的就业状况,重点关注经合组织(OECD)高收入国家实施的干预措施或政策。本系统评价侧重于广泛的潜在与就业相关的结果,包括就业率、重返工作岗位的时间和病假长短。71 篇评估各种干预措施有效性的论文的结果被综合为叙述性综述。干预措施分为六类:反歧视立法、配额制度、兼职病假、分级返回工作和工资补贴计划。反歧视立法并不能有效改善残疾人的就业前景。配额制度和工资补贴计划的证据存在矛盾。然而,提供兼职病假或分级返回工作都与残疾人的工作参与度的提高密切相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验