Kamolsripat Thansita, Thinrungroj Nithi, Pinyopornpanish Kanokwan, Kijdamrongthum Phuripong, Leerapun Apinya, Chitapanarux Taned, Thongsawat Satawat, Praisontarangkul Ong-Ard, Pojchamarnwiputh Suwalee
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai Thailand.
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai Thailand.
JGH Open. 2024 Mar 14;8(3):e13051. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.13051. eCollection 2024 Mar.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Functional dyspepsia (FD) remains a therapeutic challenge, and the efficacy of antispasmodic agents as adjunctive therapy is not well established. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pinaverium bromide added to omeprazole in treating refractory FD. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with refractory dyspepsia. Participants were randomly assigned to receive pinaverium (50 mg, 3 times/day, n = 36) or placebo ( = 36) in addition to omeprazole for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the responder rate for adequate relief. Secondary outcomes included the Global Overall Symptom Scale (GOSS), quality of life, and safety profile. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in the adequate relief response rate between the pinaverium bromide and control group at week 2 (58.3% vs. 62.9%, P = 0.697), week 4 (62.9% vs. 78.1%, = 0.173), week 6 (64.7% vs. 75.0%, = 0.363), and week 8 (64.7% vs. 75.0%, = 0.363). Additionally, there were no significant differences observed in the decline of symptom score between the two groups at week 4 (8.4 ± 7.6 vs. 7.7 ± 7.1, = 0.702) and week 8 (10.9 ± 8.2 vs. 8.4 ± 7.2, = 0.196). Similarly, there were no significant differences in terms of quality of life between the two groups. Adverse event rates were also comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Pinaverium bromide was found to be safe in the treatment of refractory dyspepsia, but it did not demonstrate a significant benefit in improving symptoms.
背景与目的:功能性消化不良(FD)仍然是一个治疗难题,抗痉挛药物作为辅助治疗的疗效尚未明确。本研究旨在评估在奥美拉唑基础上加用匹维溴铵治疗难治性FD的疗效和安全性。 方法:我们对难治性消化不良患者进行了一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。参与者被随机分配接受匹维溴铵(50毫克,每日3次,n = 36)或安慰剂(n = 36),同时服用奥美拉唑,为期8周。主要终点是充分缓解的应答率。次要结局包括全球总体症状量表(GOSS)、生活质量和安全性。 结果:在第2周(58.3%对62.9%,P = 0.697)、第4周(62.9%对78.1%,P = 0.173)、第6周(64.7%对75.0%,P = 0.363)和第8周(64.7%对75.0%,P = 0.363)时,匹维溴铵组和对照组在充分缓解应答率方面未观察到统计学显著差异。此外,在第4周(8.4±7.6对7.7±7.1,P = 0.702)和第8周(10.9±8.2对8.4±7.2,P = 0.196)时,两组在症状评分下降方面也未观察到显著差异。同样,两组在生活质量方面也没有显著差异。两组的不良事件发生率也相当。 结论:发现匹维溴铵治疗难治性消化不良是安全的,但在改善症状方面未显示出显著益处。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020-4-30
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015-1-26
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018-2-28
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017-3-20
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021-10
AMB Express. 2024-12-24
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021-10
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021-11-1
Lancet. 2020-11-21
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020-7-28
Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2020-6
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020-4-30
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017-1
Gastroenterology. 2016-5
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015-8