Ji Xu, Elmoznino Eric, Deane George, Constant Axel, Dumas Guillaume, Lajoie Guillaume, Simon Jonathan, Bengio Yoshua
Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, Quebec H2S 3H1, Canada.
Department of Computer Science and Operations Research, University of Montreal, Pavillon André-Aisenstadt 2920, chemin de la Tour, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada.
Neurosci Conscious. 2024 Mar 1;2024(1):niae001. doi: 10.1093/nc/niae001. eCollection 2024.
Conscious states-state that there is something it is like to be in-seem both rich or full of detail and ineffable or hard to fully describe or recall. The problem of ineffability, in particular, is a longstanding issue in philosophy that partly motivates the explanatory gap: the belief that consciousness cannot be reduced to underlying physical processes. Here, we provide an information theoretic dynamical systems perspective on the richness and ineffability of consciousness. In our framework, the richness of conscious experience corresponds to the amount of information in a conscious state and ineffability corresponds to the amount of information lost at different stages of processing. We describe how attractor dynamics in working memory would induce impoverished recollections of our original experiences, how the discrete symbolic nature of language is insufficient for describing the rich and high-dimensional structure of experiences, and how similarity in the cognitive function of two individuals relates to improved communicability of their experiences to each other. While our model may not settle all questions relating to the explanatory gap, it makes progress toward a fully physicalist explanation of the richness and ineffability of conscious experience-two important aspects that seem to be part of what makes qualitative character so puzzling.
意识状态——那种处于其中会有某种感受的状态——似乎既丰富或充满细节,又难以言表或难以完全描述或回忆。尤其是难以言表的问题,这是哲学中一个长期存在的问题,它在一定程度上引发了解释鸿沟:即认为意识不能还原为潜在的物理过程。在此,我们从信息论动力系统的角度探讨意识的丰富性和难以言表性。在我们的框架中,有意识体验的丰富性对应于意识状态中的信息量,而难以言表性对应于在不同处理阶段丢失的信息量。我们描述了工作记忆中的吸引子动力学如何导致对我们原始体验的贫乏回忆,语言的离散符号性质如何不足以描述体验的丰富和高维结构,以及两个人认知功能的相似性如何与他们彼此之间体验的更好可交流性相关。虽然我们的模型可能无法解决与解释鸿沟相关的所有问题,但它朝着对有意识体验的丰富性和难以言表性进行完全物理主义解释迈出了一步——这两个重要方面似乎是使质性特征如此令人困惑的部分原因。