• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦左心室辅助装置患者的社会经济地位、多种疾病并存情况和医疗保健利用情况。

Socio-economic position, multimorbidity, and health care utilization among Danish left ventricular assist device patients.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):1919-1931. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14750. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.14750
PMID:38488159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11287312/
Abstract

AIMS

Increasing numbers of patients with advanced heart failure and significant comorbidity and social barriers are considered for left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). We sought to examine health care utilization post-LVAD implantation, including the influence of individual-level socio-economic position and multimorbidity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a Danish nationwide cohort study linking individual-level data from clinical LVAD databases, the Scandiatransplant Database, and Danish national medical and administrative registries. Socio-economic position included cohabitation status, educational level, and employment status. Multimorbidity was defined as two or more chronic conditions from at least two chronic disease groups. Health care utilization (hospital activity, general practice activity, and redeemed medical prescriptions) within 2 years post-discharge after LVAD implantation was evaluated using descriptive statistics at 0.5 year intervals. We identified 119 patients discharged alive with first-time LVAD implanted between 2006 and 2018. The median age of the patients was 56.1 years, and 88.2% were male. Patients were followed until heart transplantation, LVAD explantation, death, 31 December 2018, or for 2 years. The median follow-up was 0.8 years. The highest median use of health care services was observed 0-0.5 years post-LVAD discharge compared with the subsequent follow-up intervals: 0.5-1, 1-1.5, and 1.5-2 years, respectively. The median (interquartile range) number of hospitalizations was 10 (7-14), bed days 14 (9-28), outpatient visits 8 (5-12), telephone contacts with a general practitioner 4 (2-8), and total redeemed medical prescriptions 26 (19-37) within 0-0.5 years post-LVAD discharge compared with the median utilization within the consecutive follow-up periods [e.g. within 0.5-1 year: hospitalizations 5 (3-8), bed days 8 (4-14), outpatient visits 5 (3-8), telephone contacts 2 (0-5), and redeemed medical prescriptions 24 (18-30)]. The median use of health care services was stable from 0.5 years onwards. The median number of hospitalizations and bed days was slightly higher in patients living alone with a low educational level or low employment status within 0-0.5 years post-LVAD implantation. Finally, the median number of in-hospital days and redeemed prescriptions was higher among patients with pre-existing multimorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who underwent LVAD implantation, health care utilization was high in the early post-LVAD discharge phase and was influenced by socio-economic position. Multimorbidity influenced the number of in-hospital days and redeemed prescriptions during the 2 year follow-up.

摘要

目的

越来越多患有晚期心力衰竭和严重合并症及社会障碍的患者被考虑接受左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗。我们旨在研究 LVAD 植入术后的医疗保健利用情况,包括个体社会经济地位和多种合并症的影响。

方法和结果

我们进行了一项丹麦全国性队列研究,将个体数据与临床 LVAD 数据库、Scandiatransplant 数据库和丹麦国家医疗和行政登记处相关联。社会经济地位包括同居状况、教育程度和就业状况。多种合并症定义为至少两种来自两个或多个慢性疾病组的慢性疾病。使用描述性统计方法,在 LVAD 植入后 0.5 年的间隔内评估出院后 2 年内(0.5-1 年、1-1.5 年和 1.5-2 年)的出院后患者的医疗保健服务利用情况(医院活动、全科医生活动和已配药)。我们确定了 119 名在 2006 年至 2018 年间首次植入 LVAD 且存活出院的患者。患者的中位年龄为 56.1 岁,88.2%为男性。患者接受随访直至心脏移植、LVAD 取出、死亡、2018 年 12 月 31 日或 2 年。中位随访时间为 0.8 年。与随后的随访间隔相比,LVAD 出院后 0-0.5 年观察到最高的医疗保健服务中位使用率:0.5-1 年、1-1.5 年和 1.5-2 年。与连续随访期间的中位使用率相比,LVAD 出院后 0-0.5 年内的中位(四分位距)住院次数为 10(7-14),住院天数为 14(9-28),门诊就诊次数为 8(5-12),全科医生电话联系次数为 4(2-8),总配药处方数为 26(19-37)[例如,在 0.5-1 年内:住院次数为 5(3-8),住院天数为 8(4-14),门诊就诊次数为 5(3-8),电话联系次数为 2(0-5),配药处方数为 24(18-30)]。LVAD 出院后 0.5 年及以后,医疗保健服务的中位使用率保持稳定。在 LVAD 植入术后 0-0.5 年内,独居、教育程度低或就业状况低的患者住院次数和住院天数的中位值略高。最后,合并症较多的患者住院天数和配药处方的中位值较高。

结论

在接受 LVAD 植入的患者中,LVAD 出院后的早期医疗保健利用度较高,且受社会经济地位影响。多种合并症影响了 2 年随访期间的住院天数和配药处方数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1d/11287312/8437ab44ac71/EHF2-11-1919-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1d/11287312/f578a49e1016/EHF2-11-1919-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1d/11287312/ac0f20951bec/EHF2-11-1919-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1d/11287312/3b53e8578dc1/EHF2-11-1919-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1d/11287312/2044001bf685/EHF2-11-1919-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1d/11287312/8437ab44ac71/EHF2-11-1919-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1d/11287312/f578a49e1016/EHF2-11-1919-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1d/11287312/ac0f20951bec/EHF2-11-1919-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1d/11287312/3b53e8578dc1/EHF2-11-1919-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1d/11287312/2044001bf685/EHF2-11-1919-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1d/11287312/8437ab44ac71/EHF2-11-1919-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Socio-economic position, multimorbidity, and health care utilization among Danish left ventricular assist device patients.丹麦左心室辅助装置患者的社会经济地位、多种疾病并存情况和医疗保健利用情况。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):1919-1931. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14750. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
2
Long-Term Medical Treatment and Adherence in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study.左心室辅助装置患者的长期治疗和依从性:一项丹麦全国队列研究。
ASAIO J. 2023 Dec 1;69(12):e482-e490. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002057. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
3
Influence of multimorbidity and socioeconomic factors on long-term cross-sectional health care service utilization in heart transplant recipients: A Danish cohort study.多病症和社会经济因素对心脏移植受者长期横断面医疗服务利用的影响:一项丹麦队列研究。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Apr;41(4):527-537. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Use of left ventricular assist device (HeartMate II): a Singapore experience.左心室辅助装置(HeartMate II)的应用:新加坡的经验
Artif Organs. 2014 Jul;38(7):543-8. doi: 10.1111/aor.12247. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
5
Outcomes Associated With Left Ventricular Assist Devices Among Recipients With and Without End-stage Renal Disease.左心室辅助装置在终末期肾病患者和非终末期肾病患者中的应用结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):204-209. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4831.
6
Left ventricular assist devices: an evidence-based analysis.左心室辅助装置:基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(3):1-69. Epub 2004 Mar 1.
7
Midterm outcome of implantable left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation: Single-center experience in Japan.作为移植桥梁的植入式左心室辅助装置的中期结果:日本单中心经验
J Cardiol. 2015 May;65(5):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
8
Significance of Residual Mitral Regurgitation After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.连续血流左心室辅助装置植入术后残余二尖瓣反流的意义。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Feb;5(2):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
9
Outcomes Among Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices Receiving Maintenance Outpatient Hemodialysis: A Case Series.接受维持性门诊血液透析的左心室辅助装置患者的结局:病例系列。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Feb;77(2):226-234. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
10
Outcomes after implantation of partial-support left ventricular assist devices in inotropic-dependent patients: Do we still need full-support assist devices?在依赖血管活性药物的患者中植入部分支持左心室辅助装置后的结果:我们仍然需要全支持辅助装置吗?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Sep;148(3):1115-21; discussion 1021-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.063. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual-Level Socioeconomic Position and Long-Term Prognosis in Danish Heart-Transplant Recipients.丹麦心脏移植受者个体社会经济地位与长期预后。
Transpl Int. 2023 Mar 22;36:10976. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.10976. eCollection 2023.
2
Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Fully Magnetically Levitated vs Axial-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices in the MOMENTUM 3 Randomized Trial.在 MOMENTUM 3 随机试验中,完全磁悬浮与轴流左心室辅助装置患者的 5 年结果。
JAMA. 2022 Sep 27;328(12):1233-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.16197.
3
Trends and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: JACC Focus Seminar.
左心室辅助装置治疗的趋势和结果:美国心脏病学会焦点研讨会。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 22;79(11):1092-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.017.
4
Influence of multimorbidity and socioeconomic factors on long-term cross-sectional health care service utilization in heart transplant recipients: A Danish cohort study.多病症和社会经济因素对心脏移植受者长期横断面医疗服务利用的影响:一项丹麦队列研究。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Apr;41(4):527-537. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
Twelfth Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Report: Readmissions After Left Ventricular Assist Device.第十二次机械循环辅助支持机构注册报告:左心室辅助装置后的再入院。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Mar;113(3):722-737. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.12.011. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
6
2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368.
7
The impact of socioeconomic status in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs).左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者的社会经济地位的影响。
J Card Surg. 2021 Oct;36(10):3501-3508. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15794. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Analysis of Trends and Outcomes of 90 and 180 Day Readmissions After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后90天和180天再入院的趋势及结果分析
ASAIO J. 2022 Mar 1;68(3):356-362. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001486.
9
Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Outcomes After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Using the Area Deprivation Index.利用地区贫困指数评估社会经济地位对心室辅助装置植入术后结局的影响。
J Card Fail. 2021 May;27(5):597-601. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.01.010.
10
Psychosocial Risk and Its Association With Outcomes in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.心理社会风险及其与连续血流左心室辅助装置患者结局的关系。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006910. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.006910. Epub 2020 Sep 8.