Jacobs Cathy M, Radosa Julia C, Wagmann Lea, Zimmermann Julia S M, Kaya Askin C, Aygün Aylin, Edel Tatjana, Stotz Lisa, Ismaeil Mohamed, Solomayer Erich-Franz, Meyer Markus R
Department of Experimental and Clinical Toxicology, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Center for Molecular Signaling (PZMS), Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Saarland, Germany.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024 May;416(12):2969-2981. doi: 10.1007/s00216-024-05244-6. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
Oral endocrine therapies (OET) for breast cancer treatment need to be taken over a long period of time and are associated with considerable side effects. Therefore, adherence to OET is an important issue and of high clinical significance for breast cancer patients' caregivers. We hypothesized that a new bioanalytical strategy based on liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry might be suitable for unbiased adherence monitoring (AM) of OET. Four different biomatrices (plasma, urine, finger prick blood by volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), oral fluid (OF)) were evaluated regarding their suitability for AM of the OET abemaciclib, anastrozole, exemestane, letrozole, palbociclib, ribociclib, tamoxifen, and endoxifen. An analytical method was developed and validated according to international recommendations. The analytical procedures were successfully validated in all sample matrices for most analytes, even meeting requirements for therapeutic drug monitoring. Chromatographic separation of analytes was achieved in less than 10 min and limits of quantification ranged from 1 to 1000 ng/mL. The analysis of 25 matching patient samples showed that AM of OET is possible using all four matrices with the exception of, e.g., letrozole and exemestane in OF. We were able to show that unbiased bioanalytical AM of OET was possible using different biomatrices with distinct restrictions. Sample collection of VAMS was difficult in most cases due to circulatory restraints and peripheral neuropathy in fingers and OF sampling was hampered by dry mouth syndrome in some cases. Although parent compounds could be detected in most of the urine samples, metabolites should be included when analyzing urine or OF. Plasma is currently the most suitable matrix due to available reference concentrations.
用于乳腺癌治疗的口服内分泌疗法(OET)需要长期服用,且会产生相当多的副作用。因此,坚持OET治疗是一个重要问题,对乳腺癌患者的护理人员具有很高的临床意义。我们假设一种基于液相色谱和高分辨率质谱的新生物分析策略可能适用于OET的无偏倚依从性监测(AM)。评估了四种不同的生物基质(血浆、尿液、通过体积吸收微采样(VAMS)采集的手指刺血、口腔液(OF))对于阿贝西利、阿那曲唑、依西美坦、来曲唑、哌柏西利、瑞博西尼、他莫昔芬和恩杂鲁胺等OET进行AM的适用性。根据国际建议开发并验证了一种分析方法。大多数分析物的分析程序在所有样品基质中均成功验证,甚至满足治疗药物监测的要求。分析物在不到10分钟内实现色谱分离,定量限范围为1至1000 ng/mL。对25份匹配的患者样品进行分析表明,除了例如OF中的来曲唑和依西美坦外,使用所有四种基质都可以对OET进行AM。我们能够证明,使用具有不同限制的不同生物基质对OET进行无偏倚生物分析AM是可行的。在大多数情况下,由于循环受限和手指周围神经病变,VAMS的样品采集困难,在某些情况下,口干综合征会妨碍OF采样。虽然大多数尿液样品中可以检测到母体化合物,但在分析尿液或OF时应包括代谢物。由于有可用的参考浓度,血浆目前是最合适的基质。