Endocrinology and Metabolism, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Città di Torino, Turin, Italy.
SC Territorial Diabetology, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Torino 5, Turin, Italy.
Acta Diabetol. 2024 Jun;61(6):693-703. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02262-9. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
To compare the effectiveness of commonly used offloading devices for the treatment of neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus. This meta-analysis (MA) has been performed for giving an answer to clinical questions on this topic of the Italian guideline on diabetic foot syndrome.
The present MA includes randomized controlled studies (duration > 12 weeks) comparing, in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-infected neuropathic foot ulcer: any offloading device vs either no offloading device or conventional footwear; removable versus non-removable offloading devices; surgical procedure vs other offloading approaches. The primary endpoint was ulcer healing.
A total of 184 studies were identified, and 18 were considered eligible for the analysis. We found that: any plantar off-loading, when compared to the absence of plantar offloading device, is associated with a higher ulcer healing (MH-OR: 3.13 [1.08, 9.11], p = 0.04, I = 0%); total contact cast or nonremovable knee-high walker, compared to other offloading devices, had a higher ulcer healing rate (MH-OR: 2.64 [1.43, 4.89], p = 0.002, I = 51%); surgical offloading for active ulcers in combination with post-surgery offloading achieves higher ulcer healing rate when compared to offloading devices alone (MH-OR: 6.77 [1.64, 27.93], p = 0.008, I = 0%).
Any plantar offloading, compared to the absence of plantar offloading device, is associated with a higher ulcer healing rate. Total contact cast or nonremovable knee-high walker, compared to other offloading devices, is preferable. Surgical offloading for active ulcers, in combination with post-surgery offloading devices, achieves a higher ulcer healing rate when compared to other offloading devices alone. Further studies with a larger cohort of patients with diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers and extended follow-up periods are necessary.
比较常用于治疗糖尿病患者神经病变性足部溃疡的各种减压装置的疗效。本荟萃分析(MA)是为了回答意大利糖尿病足综合征指南中关于这一主题的临床问题而进行的。
本 MA 纳入了比较糖尿病伴非感染性神经病变性足部溃疡患者的随机对照研究(持续时间>12 周):任何减压装置与无减压装置或常规鞋具相比;可移动与不可移动减压装置;手术与其他减压方法。主要终点为溃疡愈合。
共确定了 184 项研究,其中 18 项被认为符合分析条件。我们发现:与无足底减压装置相比,任何足底减压装置均与更高的溃疡愈合率相关(MH-OR:3.13[1.08,9.11],p=0.04,I=0%);全接触石膏或不可移动的膝高助行器与其他减压装置相比,溃疡愈合率更高(MH-OR:2.64[1.43,4.89],p=0.002,I=51%);与单独使用减压装置相比,手术减压联合术后减压可使活动性溃疡的愈合率更高(MH-OR:6.77[1.64,27.93],p=0.008,I=0%)。
与无足底减压装置相比,任何足底减压装置均与更高的溃疡愈合率相关。全接触石膏或不可移动的膝高助行器比其他减压装置更可取。与单独使用其他减压装置相比,手术减压联合术后减压可使活动性溃疡的愈合率更高。需要进一步开展具有更大的糖尿病神经病变性足部溃疡患者队列和延长随访期的研究。