早期非小细胞肺癌患者接受多学科癌症咨询和治疗的机会差异:一项 SEER-Medicare 分析。

Disparities in Access to Multidisciplinary Cancer Consultations and Treatment for Patients With Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A SEER-Medicare Analysis.

机构信息

School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024 Sep 1;120(1):102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Disparities in access to a multidisciplinary cancer consultation (MDCc) persist, and the role of physician relationships remains understudied. This study examined the extent to which multilevel factors, including patient characteristics and patient-sharing network measures reflecting the structure of physician relationships, are associated with an MDCc and receipt of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery among patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data for patients diagnosed with stage I-IIA NSCLC from 2016 to 2017. We assembled patient-sharing networks and identified cancer specialists who were locally unique for their specialty, herein referred to as linchpins. The proportion of linchpin cancer specialists for each hospital referral region (HRR) was calculated as a network-based measure of specialist scarcity. We used multilevel multinomial logistic regression to estimate associations between study variables and receipt of an MDCc and multilevel logistic regression to examine the relationship between patient receipt of an MDCc and initial treatment.

RESULTS

Our study included 6120 patients with stage I-IIA NSCLC, of whom 751 (12.3%) received an MDCc, 1729 (28.3%) consulted only a radiation oncologist, 2010 (32.8%) consulted only a surgeon, and 1630 (26.6%) consulted neither specialist within 2 months of diagnosis. Compared with patients residing in an HRR with a low proportion of linchpin surgeons, those residing in an HRR with a high proportion of linchpin surgeons had a 2.99 (95% CI, 1.87-4.78) greater relative risk of consulting only a radiation oncologist versus receiving an MDCc and a 2.70 (95% CI, 1.68-4.35) greater relative risk of consulting neither specialist versus receiving an MDCc. Patients who received an MDCc were 5.32 times (95% CI, 4.27-6.63) more likely to receive stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Physician networks are associated with receipt of an MDCc and treatment, underscoring the potential for leveraging patient-sharing network analysis to improve access to lung cancer care.

摘要

目的

获得多学科癌症咨询(MDCc)的机会存在差异,且医生关系的作用仍研究不足。本研究旨在评估多层次因素(包括患者特征和反映医生关系结构的患者共享网络措施)与早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的 MDCc 就诊率以及接受立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)与手术治疗的比例之间的相关性。

方法和材料

在这项横断面研究中,我们分析了 2016 年至 2017 年期间诊断为 I 期至 IIA 期 NSCLC 的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据。我们组建了患者共享网络,并确定了在特定专业领域具有本地独特性的癌症专家,在此称为关键专家。每个医院转诊区域(HRR)的关键专家比例作为衡量专家稀缺性的网络指标进行计算。我们使用多水平多项逻辑回归来估计研究变量与 MDCc 就诊率之间的相关性,并使用多水平逻辑回归来检查患者接受 MDCc 就诊与初始治疗之间的关系。

结果

本研究纳入了 6120 名 I 期至 IIA 期 NSCLC 患者,其中 751 名(12.3%)接受了 MDCc 就诊,1729 名(28.3%)仅咨询了放射肿瘤学家,2010 名(32.8%)仅咨询了外科医生,1630 名(26.6%)在诊断后 2 个月内未咨询任何专家。与居住在关键外科医生比例较低的 HRR 的患者相比,居住在关键外科医生比例较高的 HRR 的患者仅咨询放射肿瘤学家而不是接受 MDCc 就诊的相对风险高 2.99(95%CI,1.87-4.78),未咨询任何专家而不是接受 MDCc 就诊的相对风险高 2.70(95%CI,1.68-4.35)。接受 MDCc 就诊的患者接受 SBRT 治疗而非手术治疗的可能性是未接受 MDCc 就诊患者的 5.32 倍(95%CI,4.27-6.63)。

结论

医生网络与 MDCc 就诊和治疗相关,突出了利用患者共享网络分析来改善肺癌护理的潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索