Program in QUantitative Social Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2427451. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.27451.
Cancer treatment delay is a recognized marker of worse outcomes. Timely treatment may be associated with physician patient-sharing network characteristics, yet this remains understudied.
To examine the associations of surgeon and care team patient-sharing network measures with breast cancer treatment delay.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study of Medicare claims in a US population-based setting was conducted from 2017 to 2020. Eligible participants included patients with breast cancer who received surgery and the subset who went on to receive adjuvant therapy. Patient-sharing networks were constructed for treating physicians. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to February 2024.
Surgeon linchpin score (a measure of local uniqueness or scarcity) and care density (a measure of physician team familiarity) were assessed. Surgeons were considered linchpins if their linchpin score was in the top 15%. The care density of a patient's physician team was calculated on preoperative teams for surgically-treated patients and postoperative teams for adjuvant therapy-receiving patients.
The primary outcomes were surgical and adjuvant delay, which were defined as greater than 60 days between biopsy and surgery and greater than 60 days between surgery and adjuvant therapy, respectively.
The study cohort included 56 433 patients (18 004 aged 70-74 years [31.9%]) who were mostly from urban areas (44 931 patients [79.6%]). Among these patients, 8009 (14.2%) experienced surgical delay. Linchpin surgeon status (locally unique surgeon) was not statistically associated with surgical delay; however, patients with high preoperative care density (ie, high team familiarity) had lower odds of surgical delay compared with those with low preoperative care density (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.53-0.63). Of the 29 458 patients who received adjuvant therapy after surgery, 5700 (19.3%) experienced adjuvant delay. Patients with a linchpin surgeon had greater odds of adjuvant delay compared with those with a nonlinchpin surgeon (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.13-1.49). Compared with those with low postoperative care density, there were lower odds of adjuvant delay for patients with high postoperative care density (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.87) and medium postoperative care density (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94).
In this cross-sectional study of Medicare claims, network measures capturing physician scarcity and team familiarity were associated with timely treatment. These results may help guide system-level interventions to reduce cancer treatment delays.
癌症治疗的延迟是预后较差的一个公认标志。及时治疗可能与医生-患者共享网络特征有关,但这方面的研究还很有限。
研究外科医生和护理团队患者共享网络措施与乳腺癌治疗延迟的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在美国人群基础环境中进行的基于医疗保险索赔的横断面研究,于 2017 年至 2020 年进行。合格的参与者包括接受手术治疗的乳腺癌患者,以及接受辅助治疗的亚组患者。为治疗医生构建了患者共享网络。数据分析于 2023 年 9 月至 2024 年 2 月进行。
评估了外科医生的关键人物评分(衡量当地独特性或稀缺性的指标)和护理密度(衡量医生团队熟悉程度的指标)。如果外科医生的关键人物评分处于前 15%,则认为该外科医生是关键人物。对于接受手术治疗的患者,在术前团队中计算患者医生团队的护理密度,对于接受辅助治疗的患者,在术后团队中计算护理密度。
主要结果是手术和辅助治疗延迟,定义分别为活检和手术之间超过 60 天以及手术和辅助治疗之间超过 60 天。
研究队列包括 56433 名患者(18004 名年龄在 70-74 岁之间[31.9%]),其中大部分来自城市地区(44931 名[79.6%])。在这些患者中,8009 名(14.2%)经历了手术延迟。关键人物外科医生的地位(当地独特的外科医生)与手术延迟没有统计学关联;然而,与术前护理密度低的患者相比,术前护理密度高(即团队熟悉度高)的患者手术延迟的可能性较低(比值比[OR],0.58;95%CI,0.53-0.63)。在 29458 名接受手术后接受辅助治疗的患者中,5700 名(19.3%)经历了辅助治疗延迟。与非关键人物外科医生相比,有关键人物外科医生的患者接受辅助治疗的延迟几率更高(OR,1.30;95%CI,1.13-1.49)。与术后护理密度低的患者相比,术后护理密度高(OR,0.77;95%CI,0.69-0.87)和中等密度(OR,0.85;95%CI,0.77-0.94)的患者接受辅助治疗的可能性更低。
在这项基于医疗保险索赔的横断面研究中,捕捉医生稀缺性和团队熟悉度的网络措施与及时治疗有关。这些结果可能有助于指导系统层面的干预措施,以减少癌症治疗的延误。