Suppr超能文献

比较 vonoprazan 和质子泵抑制剂治疗胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease, Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, Shandong, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, Shandong, China.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 15;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03198-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are currently used to treat artificial ulcers after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. However, evidence-based medicine proving the efficacy of vonoprazan is still lacking. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of vonoprazan and PPIs for the treatment of artificial ulcers after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to September 2023 for related randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs that compared the efficacy of vonoprazan and PPIs in treating artificial gastric ulcers after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection were included. Two independent reviewers screened the included studies, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. The following outcomes were extracted for comparison: ulcer healing rate, ulcer shrinkage rate, delayed postoperative bleeding rate, and ulcer perforation rate.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials involving 926 patients were included. The pooled results showed that vonoprazan had a significantly lower rate of delayed postoperative bleeding than did PPIs (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.23-0.91; P = 0.03). No significant differences were found in terms of ulcer healing, shrinkage rates, or ulcer perforation rates between vonoprazan and PPIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with PPIs, vonoprazan is superior at reducing delayed postoperative bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection. However, further studies are needed to prove the efficacy of vonoprazan.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Identifier CRD42024509227.

摘要

背景

沃诺拉赞和质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)目前均被用于治疗胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后的人工溃疡。然而,目前仍缺乏证明沃诺拉赞疗效的循证医学证据。因此,本荟萃分析旨在比较沃诺拉赞和 PPIs 治疗胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后人工溃疡的疗效。

方法

检索 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,截至 2023 年 9 月,查找比较沃诺拉赞和 PPIs 治疗胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后人工溃疡的疗效的相关随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入比较沃诺拉赞和 PPIs 治疗胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后人工溃疡疗效的 RCT。由 2 位独立的审阅者筛选纳入研究、提取数据和评估偏倚风险。提取以下结局进行比较:溃疡愈合率、溃疡缩小率、术后迟发性出血率和溃疡穿孔率。

结果

纳入 9 项 RCT 共 926 例患者。汇总结果显示,沃诺拉赞的术后迟发性出血发生率显著低于 PPIs(RR=0.46;95%CI=0.23-0.91;P=0.03)。沃诺拉赞与 PPIs 相比,在溃疡愈合率、缩小率或穿孔率方面无显著差异。

结论

与 PPIs 相比,沃诺拉赞在降低内镜黏膜下剥离术后迟发性出血方面更具优势。然而,仍需要进一步的研究来证实沃诺拉赞的疗效。

系统评价注册

标识符 CRD42024509227。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/989c/10943859/1fd73a8c4b28/12876_2024_3198_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验