Suppr超能文献

沃克酰胺与质子泵抑制剂治疗内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡及预防出血的比较:一项随机对照试验和观察性研究的荟萃分析

Vonoprazan vs proton pump inhibitors in treating post-endoscopic submucosal dissection ulcers and preventing bleeding: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

作者信息

Zhou Yi, Meng Chun-Xu, Takagi Tatsuya, Tian Yu-Shi

机构信息

Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University, 1-6 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19357. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019357.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vonoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) that is frequently used in Japan for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication, treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and treatment of post endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) complications. We sought to determine if vonoprazan was superior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for treating ESD-induced ulcers (as assessed by ulcer healing and shrinkage ratios) and preventing delayed bleeding over various treatment durations (2, 4, and 8 weeks).

METHODS

We collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that discussed the effectiveness of vonoprazan and PPIs on ESD-induced ulcers and bleeding from PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar. Studies were selected according to pre-established eligibility criteria and data were extracted separately by 2 researchers with double-check. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale to assess observational studies. Meta-analyses, based on the random-effects model, were conducted to compare differences in ulcer shrinkage ratios (%) and odds ratios (ORs) for ulcer healing and delayed bleeding. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger regression test. Heterogeneity was assessed using I statistics. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to check the robustness of results. The evidential quality of the findings was assessed using the GRADE profiler.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. The OR effect sizes of vonoprazan relative to PPIs for ulcer healing were 1.33 (P = .13) with a 95% CI (0.33-3.21) at 4 weeks and 1.48 (P = .09) with a 95% CI (0.81-5.20) at 8 weeks. The overall effect size for the shrinkage ratio was 12.24% (P = .16) with a 95% CI (-4.96-29.44) at 2 weeks. The effect size of its subgroup of H. pylori-positive patients was 19.51% (P < .001) with a 95% CI (11.91-27.12). The overall OR for the occurrence of delayed bleeding was 0.66 (P = .26) with a 95% CI (0.32-1.35). After excluding combination drug studies, the overall ORs between vonoprazan and PPIs on ulcer healing and delayed bleeding were 1.44 and 0.76, respectively.

CONCLUSION

During the first 2 weeks of treatment, vonoprazan was more effective than PPIs for treating H. pylori-positive patients with ESD-induced gastric ulcers.

摘要

背景

沃克是一种钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB),在日本常用于根除幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)、治疗胃食管反流病以及治疗内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后的并发症。我们试图确定在不同治疗时长(2周、4周和8周)内,沃克在治疗ESD引起的溃疡(通过溃疡愈合和缩小率评估)以及预防延迟出血方面是否优于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)。

方法

我们从PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov和谷歌学术中收集了讨论沃克和PPI对ESD引起的溃疡及出血有效性的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究。根据预先设定的纳入标准选择研究,并由两名研究人员分别提取数据并进行核对。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估RCT,使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表评估观察性研究。基于随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以比较溃疡缩小率(%)以及溃疡愈合和延迟出血的比值比(OR)的差异。使用漏斗图和Egger回归检验评估发表偏倚。使用I统计量评估异质性。进行敏感性分析以检验结果的稳健性。使用GRADE分析器评估研究结果的证据质量。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了13项研究。在4周时,沃克相对于PPI的溃疡愈合OR效应大小为1.33(P = 0.13),95%置信区间(CI)为(0.33 - 3.21);在8周时,OR效应大小为1.48(P = 0.09),95%CI为(0.81 - 5.20)。在2周时,缩小率的总体效应大小为12.24%(P = 0.16),95%CI为(-4.96 - 29.44)。幽门螺杆菌阳性患者亚组的效应大小为19.51%(P < 0.001),95%CI为(11.91 - 27.12)。延迟出血发生的总体OR为0.66(P = 0.26),95%CI为(0.32 - 1.35)。排除联合用药研究后,沃克和PPI在溃疡愈合和延迟出血方面的总体OR分别为1.44和0.76。

结论

在治疗的前2周,沃克在治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性的ESD引起的胃溃疡患者方面比PPI更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02c4/7478518/23b8588c29dc/medi-99-e19357-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验