School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Centre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Centre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Environ Res. 2024 Jun 15;251(Pt 2):118731. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118731. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
The extent to which populations will successfully adapt to continued warming temperatures will be a crucial factor in determining future health burdens. Previous health impact assessments of future temperature-related mortality burdens mostly disregard adaptation or make simplistic assumptions. We apply a novel evidence-based approach to model adaptation that takes into account the fact that adaptation potential is likely to vary at different temperatures. Temporal changes in age-specific mortality risk associated with low and high temperatures were characterised for Scotland between 1974 and 2018 using temperature-specific RR ratios to reflect past changes in adaptive capacity. Three scenarios of future adaption were constructed consistent with the SSPs. These adaptation projections were combined with climate and population projections to estimate the mortality burdens attributable to high (above the 90th percentile of the historical temperature distribution) and low (below the 10th percentile) temperatures up to 2080 under five RCP-SSP scenarios. A decomposition analysis was conducted to attribute the change in the mortality burden into adaptation, climate and population. In 1980-2000, the heat burden (21 deaths/year) was smaller than the colder burden (312 deaths/year). In the 2060-2080 period, the heat burden was projected to be the highest under RCP8.5-SSP5 (1285 deaths/year), and the cold burden was the highest under RCP4.5-SSP4 (320 deaths/year). The net burden was lowest under RCP2.6-SSP1 and highest under RCP8.5-SSP5. Improvements in adaptation was the largest factor reducing the cold burden under RCP2.6-SSP1 whilst temperature increase was the biggest factor contributing to the high heat burdens under RCP8.5-SSP5. Ambient heat will become a more important health determinant than cold in Scotland under all climate change and socio-economic scenarios. Adaptive capacity will not fully counter projected increases in heat deaths, underscoring the need for more ambitious climate mitigation measures for Scotland and elsewhere.
人群适应持续变暖的温度的程度将是决定未来健康负担的关键因素。以前对未来与温度相关的死亡负担的健康影响评估大多忽略了适应或做出了简单的假设。我们应用一种新的基于证据的方法来模拟适应,考虑到适应潜力在不同温度下可能会有所不同。利用特定于温度的 RR 比来反映过去适应能力的变化,对苏格兰 1974 年至 2018 年期间与低温和高温相关的特定年龄死亡率风险的时间变化进行了描述。根据 SSP 构建了三种未来适应的情景。将这些适应预测与气候和人口预测相结合,以估计在五个 RCP-SSP 情景下,到 2080 年,高温(高于历史温度分布的第 90 个百分位)和低温(低于第 10 个百分位)造成的死亡负担。进行了分解分析,以将死亡率负担的变化归因于适应、气候和人口。在 1980-2000 年期间,热负荷(每年 21 人死亡)小于冷负荷(每年 312 人死亡)。在 2060-2080 年期间,预计 RCP8.5-SSP5 下的热负荷最高(每年 1285 人死亡),而 RCP4.5-SSP4 下的冷负荷最高(每年 320 人死亡)。在 RCP2.6-SSP1 下净负担最低,在 RCP8.5-SSP5 下最高。在 RCP2.6-SSP1 下,适应的改善是降低冷负荷的最大因素,而在 RCP8.5-SSP5 下,温度升高是导致高温热负荷增加的最大因素。在所有气候变化和社会经济情景下,环境热将成为苏格兰比寒冷更重要的健康决定因素。适应能力无法完全抵消预计的高温死亡人数增加,这突显了苏格兰和其他地方更需要采取更具雄心的气候缓解措施。