Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Jun;137:106158. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106158. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
There is a lack of synthesized knowledge on nursing students self-directed learning in bioscience and how to best support students' learning in this subject. The purpose of this integrative review is to synthesize current literature on perspectives on self-directed learning among nursing students studying bioscience to guide further research aiming to support students' learning more effectively.
An integrative review in line with Whittemore & Knafl's modified framework containing five stages: problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis and presentation. A structured literature search was undertaken in the Web of Science, ERIC, Medline and CINAHL databases from November 2022 to January 2023. The inclusion criteria were nursing students enrolled in a bachelor programme, research addressing activities intended for learning bioscience, in addition to formal taught lectures and perspectives on self-directed learning in natural science subjects within nurse education such as views, actions, activities, habits and attitudes. Exclusion criteria were students in other education programs, research in formal learning contexts, and self-directed learning in other subjects than natural science subjects. Rigour of each included source was assessed using Whittemore & Knafl's suggested 2-point scale (high or low). A constant comparison method was used to synthesize results.
Of the initial 1143 sources, 12 articles were included after abstract and full-text screening: one pilot study for randomized controlled trial, one qualitative study, two mixed methods studies and eight quantitative studies. The sample size was from 23 to 563 participants.
This review identifies self-directed learning in bioscience understood as a continuum of teacher-directedness and self-directedness rather than as distinguished orientations. There seem to be no consistent definition of self-directed learning in bioscience, yet descriptions commonly imply metacognitive learning approaches. Nursing students value digital learning resources, yet technology might be secondary to the skill of self-directed learning.
目前缺乏关于护理学生在生物科学领域自主学习的综合知识,也缺乏关于如何在这一学科中最好地支持学生学习的知识。本综述的目的是综合目前关于护理学生在生物科学领域自主学习观点的文献,以指导进一步的研究,旨在更有效地支持学生的学习。
本综述符合 Whittemore 和 Knafl 的经过修改的框架,包含五个阶段:问题识别、文献搜索、数据评估、数据分析和呈现。从 2022 年 11 月到 2023 年 1 月,在 Web of Science、ERIC、Medline 和 CINAHL 数据库中进行了系统的文献搜索。纳入标准为注册在护理学学士课程中的护理学生,研究涉及学习生物科学的活动,除了正规的授课讲座外,还有护士教育中自然科学学科的自主学习观点,如观点、行动、活动、习惯和态度。排除标准为其他教育项目的学生、正规学习环境中的研究以及非自然科学学科的自主学习。使用 Whittemore 和 Knafl 建议的 2 分制(高或低)评估每个纳入来源的严谨性。使用恒比法对结果进行综合。
在最初的 1143 个来源中,经过摘要和全文筛选后,有 12 篇文章被纳入:一项随机对照试验的试点研究、一项定性研究、两项混合方法研究和八项定量研究。样本量从 23 到 563 名参与者不等。
本综述确定了生物科学领域的自主学习,将其理解为教师指导和自主学习的连续体,而不是不同的方向。虽然生物科学领域的自主学习似乎没有一致的定义,但描述通常暗示元认知学习方法。护理学生重视数字学习资源,但技术可能次于自主学习的技能。