相似文献
1
Evidence that publication bias contaminated studies on visual event boundaries and anchoring effects.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 26;121(13):e2320278121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320278121. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
2
Electrophysiological correlates of adjustment process in anchoring effects.
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Nov 21;445(3):199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.07.061. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
3
Noise Increases Anchoring Effects.
Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;33(1):60-75. doi: 10.1177/09567976211024254. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
4
Visual evaluation of surface anchoring strength by electrohydrodynamic convection of a nematic liquid crystal.
Phys Rev E. 2017 Oct;96(4-1):040701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.040701. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
Priming and Anchoring Effects in Visualization.
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Jan;24(1):584-594. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744138. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
6
Activation of human motion processing areas during event perception.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Dec;3(4):335-45. doi: 10.3758/cabn.3.4.335.
7
The spatial layout of doorways and environmental boundaries shape the content of event memories.
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105091. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105091. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
Influenced from the start: anchoring bias in time trade-off valuations.
Qual Life Res. 2016 Sep;25(9):2179-91. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1266-x. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
9
Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(13-14):845-50. doi: 10.1080/15287390801985844.
10
Occlusions at event boundaries during encoding have a negative effect on infant memory.
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Apr;41:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
引用本文的文献
1
Reply to Francis: Replicability, false alarms, and walking through doorways.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 26;121(13):e2401487121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401487121. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
本文引用的文献
1
Visual event boundaries restrict anchoring effects in decision-making.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 31;120(44):e2303883120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2303883120. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
2
Too good to be true: publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):151-6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0227-9.
3
False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
4
An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings.
Clin Trials. 2007;4(3):245-53. doi: 10.1177/1740774507079441.
Zotero 插件