• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症中的左位偏差。

Left-digit bias in surgical decision-making for lumbar spinal stenosis.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA; Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2024 Aug;24(8):1388-1395. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.03.007
PMID:38499062
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Left-digit bias is a behavioral heuristic or cognitive "shortcut" in which the leftmost digit of a number, such as patient age, disproportionately influences surgical decisions.

PURPOSE

To determine if left-digit bias in patient age influences the decision to perform arthrodesis with instrumentation vs decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis identified in the 2017-2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the percent of patients who underwent arthrodesis with instrumentation (AwI). Matched age group comparisons without left-digit differences (ie, 76/77 vs 78/79, 80/81 vs 82/83, etc.) were performed to isolate the effect of the heuristic. Secondary outcomes including peri-operative events and complications were also compared within AwI and decompression cohorts.

METHODS

Using CPT codes, procedures were classified as either AwI or decompression. Patients were grouped into 6 cohorts based on 2-year age windows (74/75, 76/77, 78/79, 80/81, 82/83, 84/85). The cohorts were propensity matched with neighboring age groups based on the presence of spondylolisthesis, demographics, and comorbidities. The primary comparison was between those aged 78/79 vs 80/81.

RESULTS

After matching, the primary cohort consisted of two groups of 1,550 patients (aged 78/79 and 80/81). Patients aged 80/81 were less likely to undergo AwI than patients aged 78/79 (23.5% vs 27.2%, p=.021). AwI procedures occurred at similar rates between age groups with the same left digit. Within the decompression and AwI cohorts, there were no differences in secondary outcomes between patients aged 78/79 and 80/81.

CONCLUSIONS

LSS patients aged 80/81 are less likely to undergo AwI than patients aged 78/79, regardless of comorbidities. This was not seen when comparing patients with similar left digits in age. Until objective measures of physiologic capacity are established, left-digit bias may influence clinical decisions.

摘要

背景

左位数偏差是一种行为启发式或认知“捷径”,即数字的最左边一位数(如患者年龄)会不成比例地影响手术决策。

目的

确定患者年龄的左位数偏差是否会影响腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)中进行关节融合术与减压术的决策。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

患者样本

在国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库中,2017 年至 2021 年期间,ICD-10 诊断为腰椎狭窄症或脊椎滑脱症的患者。

结局测量

主要结局为接受关节融合术伴内固定(AwI)的患者比例。进行无左位数差异的匹配年龄组比较(即 76/77 与 78/79、80/81 与 82/83 等),以分离启发式的作用。还比较了 AwI 和减压组内的围手术期事件和并发症等次要结局。

方法

使用 CPT 代码将手术分类为 AwI 或减压术。根据 2 年的年龄窗,患者分为 6 个队列(74/75、76/77、78/79、80/81、82/83、84/85)。根据脊椎滑脱症、人口统计学和合并症,将队列与相邻年龄组进行倾向匹配。主要比较是 78/79 岁与 80/81 岁之间的比较。

结果

匹配后,主要队列由两组各 1550 名患者组成(年龄为 78/79 岁和 80/81 岁)。80/81 岁患者接受 AwI 的可能性低于 78/79 岁患者(23.5%比 27.2%,p=.021)。在具有相同左位数的年龄组中,AwI 手术的发生率相似。在减压和 AwI 队列中,78/79 岁和 80/81 岁患者之间的次要结局没有差异。

结论

无论合并症如何,80/81 岁的 LSS 患者接受 AwI 的可能性低于 78/79 岁的患者。当比较具有相似左位数的患者时,不会出现这种情况。在确定生理能力的客观衡量标准之前,左位数偏差可能会影响临床决策。

相似文献

1
Left-digit bias in surgical decision-making for lumbar spinal stenosis.手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症中的左位偏差。
Spine J. 2024 Aug;24(8):1388-1395. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
2
Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system.腰椎管狭窄症和I度腰椎滑脱症患者是否应根据脊柱骨盆对线情况进行不同治疗?一项为期两年的回顾性研究,对单一医疗系统内多个地点的患者报告结局指标和临床结局进行倾向匹配比较。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
3
1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation.1997年沃尔沃临床研究奖获得者。退变性腰椎滑脱伴椎管狭窄:一项前瞻性随机研究,比较单纯减压椎板切除术和融合术(有无脊柱内固定)。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2807-12. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00003.
4
Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.微创腰椎减压术后伴退行性腰椎滑脱或脊柱侧弯的腰椎管狭窄症患者的脊柱矢状位平衡的中期变化:至少 5 年随访。
Spine J. 2022 May;22(5):819-826. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.11.012. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
5
Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.肥胖对并发症及手术结果的影响:融合与非融合腰椎手术的比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):158-162. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.SPINE16448. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
6
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.与退变性腰椎滑脱相关的腰椎管狭窄症:开放减压与微创减压术后二次融合率的系统评价和荟萃分析
Neurosurgery. 2017 Mar 1;80(3):355-367. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw091.
7
The necessity and risk factors of subsequent fusion after decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5 years follow-up in two different large populations.单纯减压术后是否需要行后续融合治疗腰椎退变性滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的必要性及相关危险因素:两个不同大样本的 5 年随访研究。
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1566-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.026. Epub 2020 May 15.
8
Selective versus multi-segmental decompression and fusion for multi-segment lumbar spinal stenosis with single-segment degenerative spondylolisthesis.多节段腰椎管狭窄症合并单节段退行性腰椎滑脱的选择性减压与多节段减压融合术
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Feb 12;14(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1092-2.
9
Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.全国范围内腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗趋势。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):916-26. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182833e7c.
10
Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis?: A two-year follow-up study involving 5390 patients.减压手术后融合是否能改善腰椎管狭窄症的预后?:一项涉及 5390 例患者的两年随访研究。
Bone Joint J. 2013 Jul;95-B(7):960-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.30776.

引用本文的文献

1
Is it Necessary to Fuse? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of One- Versus Two-Level Fusions With Multilevel Decompression.是否有必要进行融合?一项针对单节段与双节段融合联合多节段减压的倾向评分匹配分析。
Global Spine J. 2025 Aug 28:21925682251370264. doi: 10.1177/21925682251370264.