Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Pathology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Oct;118(4):825-833. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
We aimed to validate the prognostic implication of uncertain resection, R(un), proposed by International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) and evaluate the prognostic value of spread through air spaces (STAS) in reclassifying the R classification among patients with lung adenocarcinoma after segmentectomy.
We enrolled 1007 patients who underwent segmentectomy for c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma between 2014 and 2017. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared to evaluate the prognostic value of IASLC-R(un) and STAS. Whether STAS would skip into complementary lobectomy was evaluated in a prospective cohort.
The current IASLC-R(un) failed to significantly stratify the RFS (P = .078) in segmentectomy, and STAS was a stronger risk factor of poor prognosis for both RFS and OS (P < .001). Moreover, the presence of STAS was associated with increased locoregional recurrence in patients undergoing segmentectomy (P < .001) but not in those treated with lobectomy (P = .187), indicating that only STAS-positive segmentectomy was consistent with the concept of R(un) in relapse pattern. After reclassifying STAS-positive segmentectomy into the R(un) category, the proposed R(un) showed an improvement in prognosis stratification. In addition, 2 of 30 patients (6.2%) in the prospective cohort who underwent initial segmentectomy and complementary lobectomy had STAS clusters in the complementary lobectomy specimens.
Unfavorable prognosis, relapse patterns consistent with R(un), and pathologic verification that saltatory spread of STAS observed in complementary lobectomy specimens supported reclassifying STAS-positive segmentectomy as R(un). STAS is a critical concern for the surgical completeness evaluation after segmentectomy.
我们旨在验证国际肺癌研究协会(IASLC)提出的不确定切除(R(un))的预后意义,并评估在肺腺癌患者亚肺段切除术后重新分类 R 分类时,气腔内播散(STAS)的预后价值。
我们纳入了 2014 年至 2017 年间接受 c 期 IA 肺腺癌亚肺段切除术的 1007 例患者。比较无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS),以评估 IASLC-R(un)和 STAS 的预后价值。前瞻性队列研究评估 STAS 是否会跳跃至补充性肺叶切除术。
目前的 IASLC-R(un)在亚肺段切除术中未能显著分层 RFS(P=0.078),而 STAS 是 RFS 和 OS 预后不良的更强风险因素(P<0.001)。此外,STAS 的存在与亚肺段切除术后局部区域复发增加相关(P<0.001),但与肺叶切除术后无相关性(P=0.187),这表明只有 STAS 阳性的亚肺段切除术与 R(un)在复发模式上的概念一致。重新将 STAS 阳性的亚肺段切除术归类为 R(un)后,提出的 R(un)在预后分层方面得到了改善。此外,前瞻性队列研究中 30 例初始接受亚肺段切除术和补充性肺叶切除术的患者中有 2 例(6.2%)在补充性肺叶切除标本中存在 STAS 簇。
预后不良、与 R(un)一致的复发模式以及在补充性肺叶切除标本中观察到的 STAS 跳跃性播散的病理证实支持将 STAS 阳性的亚肺段切除术重新归类为 R(un)。STAS 是亚肺段切除术后手术完整性评估的关键关注点。